No 😂, what’s disingenuous is people who know how absolutely fraudulent Money and his ilk were/are and yet bandwagon behind his research when it comes to circumcision.
John Money was a degenerate "sexologist" who tried to prove gender was a social construct using a barbaric experiment. It's extremely ironic to use Money to poison the anti-circumcision well considering Money justified his perverse experiment with a botched circumcision in the first place.
Yes the guy with the last name of the popular cereal brand
It's not just a name. It was the same guy. There was a weird movie about him called The Road to Wellville. It was outlandish and, I can only imagine, wildly inaccurate.
He also sexually abused infants immediately post circumcision to produce trauma and claim it was entirely circumcisions fault, but hey, it’s not like he had a track record of doing things like that…
I’m not surprised, you don’t strike me as the type to actually read medical studies
there's plenty of other research that shows brain scans of psychological harm done by circumcision to infants.
Using the same methodology done to “prove” trans kids have similar brain scans to their preferred gender, another ruse created by…. Students of John Money
No 😂, what’s disingenuous is people who know how absolutely fraudulent Money and his ilk were/are and yet bandwagon behind his research when it comes to circumcision.
John Money was a degenerate "sexologist" who tried to prove gender was a social construct using a barbaric experiment. It's extremely ironic to use Money to poison the anti-circumcision well considering Money justified his perverse experiment with a botched circumcision in the first place.
It's not just a name. It was the same guy. There was a weird movie about him called The Road to Wellville. It was outlandish and, I can only imagine, wildly inaccurate.
He also sexually abused infants immediately post circumcision to produce trauma and claim it was entirely circumcisions fault, but hey, it’s not like he had a track record of doing things like that…
I wouldn't relay on "muh trauma" to argue against circumcision anyway. There's just no reason to mutilate normal baby penises.
I’m not surprised, you don’t strike me as the type to actually read medical studies
Using the same methodology done to “prove” trans kids have similar brain scans to their preferred gender, another ruse created by…. Students of John Money
No, I never claimed any of that, but you go on believing science done by a proven pedophile and his acolytes 😂