John Money was a degenerate "sexologist" who tried to prove gender was a social construct using a barbaric experiment. It's extremely ironic to use Money to poison the anti-circumcision well considering Money justified his perverse experiment with a botched circumcision in the first place.
Yes the guy with the last name of the popular cereal brand
It's not just a name. It was the same guy. There was a weird movie about him called The Road to Wellville. It was outlandish and, I can only imagine, wildly inaccurate.
He also sexually abused infants immediately post circumcision to produce trauma and claim it was entirely circumcisions fault, but hey, it’s not like he had a track record of doing things like that…
Lower std/sti rates, lower penile cancer risk, higher long term health outcomes in nearly every study done versus slightly more sexual sensitivity during sex if not using a condom…
John Money was a degenerate "sexologist" who tried to prove gender was a social construct using a barbaric experiment. It's extremely ironic to use Money to poison the anti-circumcision well considering Money justified his perverse experiment with a botched circumcision in the first place.
It's not just a name. It was the same guy. There was a weird movie about him called The Road to Wellville. It was outlandish and, I can only imagine, wildly inaccurate.
He also sexually abused infants immediately post circumcision to produce trauma and claim it was entirely circumcisions fault, but hey, it’s not like he had a track record of doing things like that…
I wouldn't relay on "muh trauma" to argue against circumcision anyway. There's just no reason to mutilate normal baby penises.
Lower std/sti rates, lower penile cancer risk, higher long term health outcomes in nearly every study done versus slightly more sexual sensitivity during sex if not using a condom…
"Trust the science. Mutilate your dick."