Blacks in England will be insufferable to asians in London, get well deserved hate for their behaviour, then blame white supremacy for it.
It's what they've been taught to do for generations now. The only thing that changes is who they're being insufferable to and where. White supremacy is always to blame. Somehow.
Rivers of blood. Something something. Whip hand over the white man. And so on, and so forth.
I'm going to be controversial here being British myself and state that London was not a cultural city and was a shithole throughout a lot of history. The London foreigners know about is pure propaganda because another quite famous example I've seen of this is Glastonbury music festival.
That's one that a lot of people get exted about but in reality it's a muddy field you bring your own tent to and go ciand listen to some musicians play, oh like London it's filled with leftists. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't quite as bad as it is today, but even back in the day there were issues with the city that kept cropping up because it was an overcrowded shithole.
There's a reason that everybody outside the London district in the UK hates London with a passion.
But you can't deny London was a cultural landmark, outsiders and foreigners identify British by associating them with London or landmark in London. For better or worth, it was an important spot for maybe British in the past to boast about as cultural heritage. That's the reason London was a central target for the elites to overwhelm it with multiculturalism and put a goddamn pakistani as a mayor of the city. That was all planned for easy subjugation of white europeans. Needless to say, it worked fantastically for the elites.
That video is upper class as fuck, I see this quite often with the people who post this shit up going "Wow wasn't it better in the 50's?" they don't seem to even realise they're often posting up tourism board or marketing ads. I remember a photograph making it's way around Gab trying to compare air flight travel in the 50's to now. It was clearly a middle/upper class ad for air flight which is why it looked so damn posh.
The living standards of the working class as fucked as things are now are objectively better than even how some middle class families lived back during that time period purely because of technology like refrigerators, freezers and even portable cooking tech. Know your history people.
A great example of this would be checking out this series of videos that max miller did on the titanic, he did third class, second class and first class meals, the differences are pretty stark. Propaganda existed back in the 50's just as much as it does now, it wasn't all just blatant government stuff on posters.
Well yeah, one thing those people talking about air travel miss is that most people in the 50's weren't able to fly at all. That was true up to the 80's.
By "video is upper class as fuck" do you mean it's only showing the rich people on high street? Because even those areas are not the same today. The poor areas must be proportionally worse. The living standard of the working class is irrelevant to the topic but wouldn't it be roughly the same for someone in London or Whitby?
You'd have to take the time to properly research it and cross reference photographs in comparison to old video and yes, some areas in London which used to be posh as fuck are now run down as fuck. This has happened quite a bit across the UK depending on where you are.
My own home town for example Bradford, boomers swear up and down it was an up and coming city back in the day but all I know is the shithole I grew up in and that Leeds is the more trendy place to be locally. I'm mainly working from the landmarks I recognise in the video, but fleet street for example would probably be regarded as a trendy London area but yes depending on the area of London things would be much worse.
A great example of this would be Kensington and the area around Buckingham Palace. It's the equivalent of taking video of that and going "Oh wowww isn't London amazing and fancy?" yeah it is because that's the fucking palace you out of touch foreign twats. Apologies for being extremely Yorkshire but this gets to anybody in the UK lol. People going to the fucking shard and acting like they've seen all of London and they're completely full of shit.
I do believe this but London and it's abnormal affluence is one of the biggest reasons Communism took off so hard in the UK and still has a huge amount of influence here, the class divide is real. I could rant about this aspect of the UK for hours.
Washington DC is an absolute shithole riddled with niggers and parasite govies and all the problems that go long with that but that doesn't mean its any less of a cultural landmark. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.
I agree but I dislike the idea of calling London a cultural landmark, when you think of Washington D.C. for example you think of Washington Monument and the whitehouse. I'm being pedantic yes but I do think the distinction matters.
Yes this is true, but being a northerner I hate the way foreigners try to elevate London to a status it doesn't deserve. Even a town like Whitby has more cultural significance for the UK than London ever has done just because more 'actual' British people go there. London is very much a classic tourist trap destination.
Almost like most big cities aren't what people think they are. I have been to London before the huge migrant crisis many years ago and I gotta say I did not like it that much. It felt dirty.
The day the city of London elected a muslim mayor, I knew it over for them. Granted, elections are fake and gay the world over but still, a muslim was installed.
All the asian supermarkets close, and the western ones in close pursuit, then the people ask "why is this a food desert?! We only forced the grocers and restaurants t close! How could that make this a food desert?!"
I'm not being a centrist and going 'it depends/ it's not simply' but I'm betting that there's 2 factors in this:
2nd generation or 3rd generation immigrants that do not know how good they have it compared to their original country
Area based, I'm hearing from friends who are native to the area other places in London aren't playing along, seems it's Peckham self destructing on itself as a majority 'black' (because there's a difference between different African blacks alone) region and other areas don't care.
Sindho opened his shop eight years ago after moving to the UK from Pakistani Kashmir in 2004.
Eesh, you had to make it not only Blacks vs Pakistani, but Kashmir region too....
Correct, I'm impressed by that knowledge, a lot of people don't realise how even within these cities it's very localised. All it takes is you going to another postcode and the ethnic makeup is very different.
Yes, the older generation of migrants are often far more well behaved than their younger counterparts. The 2nd and 3rd generations as you've pointed out are often radicalised little shits who have been going to university and bought into the bullshit Marxist professors spew about white colonisers of Britain and that's how all of this gets kicked off. You see it with even the Pakistanis and so on where they think they're getting their own back on the British empire because they're delusional cunts.
Blacks in England will be insufferable to asians in London, get well deserved hate for their behaviour, then blame white supremacy for it.
It's what they've been taught to do for generations now. The only thing that changes is who they're being insufferable to and where. White supremacy is always to blame. Somehow.
Rivers of blood. Something something. Whip hand over the white man. And so on, and so forth.
It's all so tiresome at this point.
I honestly can't give a shit about London. That city is not an English city. Burn it to the ground and I could care less.
Another beautiful and rich city full of history and culture destroyed by leftist viruses.
I'm going to be controversial here being British myself and state that London was not a cultural city and was a shithole throughout a lot of history. The London foreigners know about is pure propaganda because another quite famous example I've seen of this is Glastonbury music festival.
That's one that a lot of people get exted about but in reality it's a muddy field you bring your own tent to and go ciand listen to some musicians play, oh like London it's filled with leftists. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't quite as bad as it is today, but even back in the day there were issues with the city that kept cropping up because it was an overcrowded shithole.
There's a reason that everybody outside the London district in the UK hates London with a passion.
But you can't deny London was a cultural landmark, outsiders and foreigners identify British by associating them with London or landmark in London. For better or worth, it was an important spot for maybe British in the past to boast about as cultural heritage. That's the reason London was a central target for the elites to overwhelm it with multiculturalism and put a goddamn pakistani as a mayor of the city. That was all planned for easy subjugation of white europeans. Needless to say, it worked fantastically for the elites.
This is London, 1950.
We can only go there in dreams.
That video is upper class as fuck, I see this quite often with the people who post this shit up going "Wow wasn't it better in the 50's?" they don't seem to even realise they're often posting up tourism board or marketing ads. I remember a photograph making it's way around Gab trying to compare air flight travel in the 50's to now. It was clearly a middle/upper class ad for air flight which is why it looked so damn posh.
The living standards of the working class as fucked as things are now are objectively better than even how some middle class families lived back during that time period purely because of technology like refrigerators, freezers and even portable cooking tech. Know your history people.
A great example of this would be checking out this series of videos that max miller did on the titanic, he did third class, second class and first class meals, the differences are pretty stark. Propaganda existed back in the 50's just as much as it does now, it wasn't all just blatant government stuff on posters.
Well yeah, one thing those people talking about air travel miss is that most people in the 50's weren't able to fly at all. That was true up to the 80's.
By "video is upper class as fuck" do you mean it's only showing the rich people on high street? Because even those areas are not the same today. The poor areas must be proportionally worse. The living standard of the working class is irrelevant to the topic but wouldn't it be roughly the same for someone in London or Whitby?
You'd have to take the time to properly research it and cross reference photographs in comparison to old video and yes, some areas in London which used to be posh as fuck are now run down as fuck. This has happened quite a bit across the UK depending on where you are.
My own home town for example Bradford, boomers swear up and down it was an up and coming city back in the day but all I know is the shithole I grew up in and that Leeds is the more trendy place to be locally. I'm mainly working from the landmarks I recognise in the video, but fleet street for example would probably be regarded as a trendy London area but yes depending on the area of London things would be much worse.
A great example of this would be Kensington and the area around Buckingham Palace. It's the equivalent of taking video of that and going "Oh wowww isn't London amazing and fancy?" yeah it is because that's the fucking palace you out of touch foreign twats. Apologies for being extremely Yorkshire but this gets to anybody in the UK lol. People going to the fucking shard and acting like they've seen all of London and they're completely full of shit.
I do believe this but London and it's abnormal affluence is one of the biggest reasons Communism took off so hard in the UK and still has a huge amount of influence here, the class divide is real. I could rant about this aspect of the UK for hours.
Washington DC is an absolute shithole riddled with niggers and parasite govies and all the problems that go long with that but that doesn't mean its any less of a cultural landmark. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.
I agree but I dislike the idea of calling London a cultural landmark, when you think of Washington D.C. for example you think of Washington Monument and the whitehouse. I'm being pedantic yes but I do think the distinction matters.
Yes this is true, but being a northerner I hate the way foreigners try to elevate London to a status it doesn't deserve. Even a town like Whitby has more cultural significance for the UK than London ever has done just because more 'actual' British people go there. London is very much a classic tourist trap destination.
Almost like most big cities aren't what people think they are. I have been to London before the huge migrant crisis many years ago and I gotta say I did not like it that much. It felt dirty.
Tokyo on the other hand is so clean and orderly, it almost feels sterile
London has been a overcrowded shithole since the industrial revolution.
The day the city of London elected a muslim mayor, I knew it over for them. Granted, elections are fake and gay the world over but still, a muslim was installed.
Couldn't care less.
Sorry to be that guy.
All the asian supermarkets close, and the western ones in close pursuit, then the people ask "why is this a food desert?! We only forced the grocers and restaurants t close! How could that make this a food desert?!"
#StopAsianHate
Try that in a small American town.
foreigners fighting each other in a foreign city
I'm not being a centrist and going 'it depends/ it's not simply' but I'm betting that there's 2 factors in this:
2nd generation or 3rd generation immigrants that do not know how good they have it compared to their original country
Area based, I'm hearing from friends who are native to the area other places in London aren't playing along, seems it's Peckham self destructing on itself as a majority 'black' (because there's a difference between different African blacks alone) region and other areas don't care.
Eesh, you had to make it not only Blacks vs Pakistani, but Kashmir region too....
Correct, I'm impressed by that knowledge, a lot of people don't realise how even within these cities it's very localised. All it takes is you going to another postcode and the ethnic makeup is very different.
Yes, the older generation of migrants are often far more well behaved than their younger counterparts. The 2nd and 3rd generations as you've pointed out are often radicalised little shits who have been going to university and bought into the bullshit Marxist professors spew about white colonisers of Britain and that's how all of this gets kicked off. You see it with even the Pakistanis and so on where they think they're getting their own back on the British empire because they're delusional cunts.
I saw that. I wish the dude had pressed charges
He showed weakness which is basically an admission of guilt that he was wrong.
Diversity vs Diversity
And nobody wins.