Considering how soft CPS and the like are on single moms and even defining abuse when it comes from a Mother, that number is probably a fraction of what it should be. These are probably just the extreme cases where the kid gets starved and beaten raw by a crackhead.
Same with ones like "group home" where the horror stories that come out of those systems is infinite, and its almost certainly a case of investigating yourself and finding yourself innocent.
Also, considering the fraction of a fraction of families that qualify as "three parent" that 764 number is absurdly large.
considering the fraction of a fraction of families that qualify as "three parent"
Would be a disproportionately female-led group. The kind of broken men who get into those relationships would do anything for the woman, so it actually makes sense they're so high.
As a foster parent I have seen the end result of that. She is also demanding all the money she can get from he government to do it. So when we get the child finally the schools have him in the very slow class, and he barely knows how to function. It takes work to teach the kid to be independent. Then we look up the mom on facebook and she has the feeling she is some kind of martyr for her child.
I know a mother of an autistic boy who does everything in her power to make sure he gets worse.
My grandmother was a special ed teacher in the poor part of town for a decade or so. By her own admission close to 2/3 of her class were just regular kids with no issues forced in there.
Their moms told them to act stupid at school to get bigger welfare checks. Because these are the types of moms whose entire income is popping out babies and milking it (guess which color they were). But my grandma would tell us stories about these kids coming in and admitting their moms beat their ass for getting too high test scores, because it would start to threaten them being "special needs" and therefore her money.
And of course, many of these kids would go on to drop out and get involved in crime. Because they really never had another option, and their minds were so stunted by being forced to act stupid that they just became actually stupid.
As bad as abuse from a father can be, and it can be brutal, most of the time I can at least see where it comes from. Almost always an explosive action, done in anger. Mother's abuse is the kind of slow drawn out action that has no understanding beyond just being evil.
Is this including psychological abuse or just physical abuse as on both fronts I can believe women are the majority on both, too prone to getting emotionally invested so if they believe the abuse is 'for the best' it would probably easily lead to a spiral whereas men can distance themselves enough that there are fewer of these spirals into more abusive acts.
I have three kids I know of that will likely end up at my house because their mother is insane. We have been trying to figure out how to do it because three kids all at once is a lot.
I honestly believe childbirth will affect the mental state of the mother, and if she already has something her personality can change. I've seen it enough times to want to look up more statistics.
So ... because women are a majority perpetrators of bad thing, therefore ...? Feminists lie? That's not news to anybody here.
Or is this proof that all women are in a secret conspiracy to oppress men? Because they commit the majority of child abuse?
What about the majority of crime that men perpetrate? What would that say about us? Or is that only a result of the fact that criminals were all victims of child abuse by their ... (predominantly but certainly not exclusively) mothers?
Besides, you'd actually need to break down several of these categories to get a true count of women vs. men perpetrators, and then you'd also need to normalize that across rates of single parent homes before you could come to any meaningful conclusions.
I've told this story before, but three of my siblings were adopted from an abusive home. They've all got serious issues because of how they were treated, but my parents had to fight the courts for years before they were willing to take custody from the psycho mother. Because obviously the biological mother is better, even if she's a neglectful abuser.
Of course, two of them are sisters, so Imp would probably approve of them being abused anyway.
It's notable because the last time these statistics were allowed to be published was 2011. From then on, only the FBI could publish them and they used extremely odd definitions to make it work in women's favor.
I'm guessing this was the last thing President Trump got over the line for us.
Considering how soft CPS and the like are on single moms and even defining abuse when it comes from a Mother, that number is probably a fraction of what it should be. These are probably just the extreme cases where the kid gets starved and beaten raw by a crackhead.
Same with ones like "group home" where the horror stories that come out of those systems is infinite, and its almost certainly a case of investigating yourself and finding yourself innocent.
Also, considering the fraction of a fraction of families that qualify as "three parent" that 764 number is absurdly large.
Would be a disproportionately female-led group. The kind of broken men who get into those relationships would do anything for the woman, so it actually makes sense they're so high.
I don't think men are too stupid. I think men have a conscience on these things.
As a foster parent I have seen the end result of that. She is also demanding all the money she can get from he government to do it. So when we get the child finally the schools have him in the very slow class, and he barely knows how to function. It takes work to teach the kid to be independent. Then we look up the mom on facebook and she has the feeling she is some kind of martyr for her child.
My grandmother was a special ed teacher in the poor part of town for a decade or so. By her own admission close to 2/3 of her class were just regular kids with no issues forced in there.
Their moms told them to act stupid at school to get bigger welfare checks. Because these are the types of moms whose entire income is popping out babies and milking it (guess which color they were). But my grandma would tell us stories about these kids coming in and admitting their moms beat their ass for getting too high test scores, because it would start to threaten them being "special needs" and therefore her money.
And of course, many of these kids would go on to drop out and get involved in crime. Because they really never had another option, and their minds were so stunted by being forced to act stupid that they just became actually stupid.
As bad as abuse from a father can be, and it can be brutal, most of the time I can at least see where it comes from. Almost always an explosive action, done in anger. Mother's abuse is the kind of slow drawn out action that has no understanding beyond just being evil.
Wonder how much wider the margin would be if they admitted trooning your kid was child abuse
Mothers would easily double if not triple.
I'd like to see the racial breakdown of this
It will still come out that women are worst, even if you break it down.
I suspect Black women are worst because there are no dads thus skewing the statistics, like blacks and gun crimes
But they won't be recorded because that would be racist.
But is it really worth turning something we have against women into a race issue and losing that advantage?
Keep your fetishes away from me, Jeffrey Dahmer.
There is no "we" here. You speak for yourself.
Is this including psychological abuse or just physical abuse as on both fronts I can believe women are the majority on both, too prone to getting emotionally invested so if they believe the abuse is 'for the best' it would probably easily lead to a spiral whereas men can distance themselves enough that there are fewer of these spirals into more abusive acts.
This is useless without a denominator to compare it too.
niggas pretend not to understand per-capita to push an agenda
I have three kids I know of that will likely end up at my house because their mother is insane. We have been trying to figure out how to do it because three kids all at once is a lot.
I honestly believe childbirth will affect the mental state of the mother, and if she already has something her personality can change. I've seen it enough times to want to look up more statistics.
I've always thought most abuse comes from non-biological parents. Does someone have the information in proportions?
Wow I never knew.
So ... because women are a majority perpetrators of bad thing, therefore ...? Feminists lie? That's not news to anybody here.
Or is this proof that all women are in a secret conspiracy to oppress men? Because they commit the majority of child abuse?
What about the majority of crime that men perpetrate? What would that say about us? Or is that only a result of the fact that criminals were all victims of child abuse by their ... (predominantly but certainly not exclusively) mothers?
Besides, you'd actually need to break down several of these categories to get a true count of women vs. men perpetrators, and then you'd also need to normalize that across rates of single parent homes before you could come to any meaningful conclusions.
therefore… a lot of women suck as mothers. that's what i got, at least. the courts are too soft on women
I've told this story before, but three of my siblings were adopted from an abusive home. They've all got serious issues because of how they were treated, but my parents had to fight the courts for years before they were willing to take custody from the psycho mother. Because obviously the biological mother is better, even if she's a neglectful abuser.
Of course, two of them are sisters, so Imp would probably approve of them being abused anyway.
that's terrible, no child deserves abuse. i also was abused (by my mother), it really messes you up. i hope your siblings are doing well
It's notable because the last time these statistics were allowed to be published was 2011. From then on, only the FBI could publish them and they used extremely odd definitions to make it work in women's favor.
I'm guessing this was the last thing President Trump got over the line for us.
But what's your point? Women are (probably) somewhat worse than men in terms of child abuse perpetration, therefore ...?
Again, this isn't news to anybody here. And we all know why you post it.