So ... because women are a majority perpetrators of bad thing, therefore ...? Feminists lie? That's not news to anybody here.
Or is this proof that all women are in a secret conspiracy to oppress men? Because they commit the majority of child abuse?
What about the majority of crime that men perpetrate? What would that say about us? Or is that only a result of the fact that criminals were all victims of child abuse by their ... (predominantly but certainly not exclusively) mothers?
Besides, you'd actually need to break down several of these categories to get a true count of women vs. men perpetrators, and then you'd also need to normalize that across rates of single parent homes before you could come to any meaningful conclusions.
I've told this story before, but three of my siblings were adopted from an abusive home. They've all got serious issues because of how they were treated, but my parents had to fight the courts for years before they were willing to take custody from the psycho mother. Because obviously the biological mother is better, even if she's a neglectful abuser.
Of course, two of them are sisters, so Imp would probably approve of them being abused anyway.
It's notable because the last time these statistics were allowed to be published was 2011. From then on, only the FBI could publish them and they used extremely odd definitions to make it work in women's favor.
I'm guessing this was the last thing President Trump got over the line for us.
So ... because women are a majority perpetrators of bad thing, therefore ...? Feminists lie? That's not news to anybody here.
Or is this proof that all women are in a secret conspiracy to oppress men? Because they commit the majority of child abuse?
What about the majority of crime that men perpetrate? What would that say about us? Or is that only a result of the fact that criminals were all victims of child abuse by their ... (predominantly but certainly not exclusively) mothers?
Besides, you'd actually need to break down several of these categories to get a true count of women vs. men perpetrators, and then you'd also need to normalize that across rates of single parent homes before you could come to any meaningful conclusions.
therefore… a lot of women suck as mothers. that's what i got, at least. the courts are too soft on women
I've told this story before, but three of my siblings were adopted from an abusive home. They've all got serious issues because of how they were treated, but my parents had to fight the courts for years before they were willing to take custody from the psycho mother. Because obviously the biological mother is better, even if she's a neglectful abuser.
Of course, two of them are sisters, so Imp would probably approve of them being abused anyway.
that's terrible, no child deserves abuse. i also was abused (by my mother), it really messes you up. i hope your siblings are doing well
It's notable because the last time these statistics were allowed to be published was 2011. From then on, only the FBI could publish them and they used extremely odd definitions to make it work in women's favor.
I'm guessing this was the last thing President Trump got over the line for us.
But what's your point? Women are (probably) somewhat worse than men in terms of child abuse perpetration, therefore ...?
Again, this isn't news to anybody here. And we all know why you post it.