Norway Man Forced Into Psychiatric Ward for 9 Days Due to Questioning mRNA Shots Online
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
Comments (38)
sorted by:
I guarantee no repercussions will happen to anyone involved in this. That's the point we are at.
Clown world has no peak.
"Perfect mental state and must be valorized by the whole society."
"Dangerous and mentally unstable, must be approached with at least 4 armed police-people*"
*The use of "Policemen" is considered hate speech and is punished with at least 4 years of jail, depending of your current social credit score.
I think the worst part, is that you know the guy behind that anonymous tip is 100% convinced what he did was the good thing to do, and will do it again.
Assuming the "anonymous tip" wasn't sent by a police officer itself.
I'm San Diego California CPS took two kids away from their parents when it was discovered neither kid has been vaccinated. Happened recently. At a certain point there is no option.but violence. If someone can come and arrest you or lock you up for no reason. Or take your kids away because they simply disagree with your vaccination status, then you aren't free.
I am actually stunned that he would be secretive and suspicious after being seized from his home and institutionalized. Why that sounds like a totally normal string of evens to me!
— David G. Cooper, psychiatrist, 1967
That was probably true in 1967 when they were mostly making shit up to try and categorize shit they barely even understood, but you can go to most bus stations and find someone who, without any context about them as a person, is obviously schizophrenic and unable to function.
Heck, you can just watch livestreams made by Terry Davis himself to see an extremely brilliant man cracking under schizophrenic episodes and devolving before your eyes into an incoherent mess. "I'm sorry for having to remember that I love you" is both the scariest and saddest sentence I've ever heard a man say.
People's abuse of an X doesn't invalidate X. This applies as equally to Psychological Issues as it does to Gun Control.
What you have done in this small snippet is exactly what schizophrenia is in most cases. I mean, the rest of that sentence is just you making shit up trying to categorize shit you barely even understand, to use your words.
It's much safer for most people to hold onto the belief that schizophrenia is purely a genetic disorder and not a sociopolitical designation of someone incapable of being placed into the machinery of industry without a mental or linguistic collapse. Without any change to our population, I predict that with the increase of 'socialism' there will be identical increases in the rates of 'schizophrenia' - just as it was in the USSR.
Heck, I know a 'schizophrenic' that is only deemed so because he was going to expose a secret that his brother kept from their family and it was more expedient to just have him committed rather than his brother losing his job, his wife and his kids. The brother with the secret is much more 'insane' than the brother who 'has schizophrenia'.
People's denial about the continuing abuse of X doesn't invalidate that X is still being abused.
If you don't care about how a person comes to a state of mind that scares you, you should have no say in what happens to that person or what they are called because you are acting from an emotional state of fear and ignorance.
Holy strawman argument, Batman.
The other poster made no argument from which a strawman could be derived. I posted source material from a psychiatrist and he hand waved it away using a bus stop generalization and Terry Davis as anecdotal examples. I countered with almost identical counterpositions of similar weight and dialectical style.
Thank god you have an anecdote that perfectly fits your worldview and your point. I'm sure that's not coincidental at all and has no effect on why you have such an extreme position, assuming its true. It really is so fortuitous you have such an exactly perfect example of the exact phenomenon you wish to tackle.
Didn't say otherwise. You seem to have rushed out a response in your emotional tantrum and forget to comprehend what I actually said.
Because basically everything you typed here "is just you making shit up trying to categorize shit you barely even understand," to use your words.
It is also very fortunate you found a literal self proclaimed "existential-Marxist" who broke away from his association for its lack of politics in operation, who coined the term anti-psychiatry to say any treatment is worse than just letting someone exist, and wrote his most famous book on abolishing the Family as it is an extension of the capitalist bourgeois and necessary to their indoctrination.
Since you think his words are so powerful that make an argument for you, I have to assume you agree with all those concepts as well since they color the entire foundation of him making that argument.
Or is that too much context for you now?
Did the scary man at the bus stop make you want to use the state to enforce your will on others?
Its okay to admit you didn't read a thing about the guy you quoted and were just trying to look smart. No one will make fun of you for trying to use a Marxist to advocate against the state.
The point made in the passage itself is key when the left begins its desire to throw 'invalid' political entities in reeducation camps.
Did you see the comment I was replying to? The topic of the post this comment is under? Pointing out the flaws of the left from the leftist perspective illustrates the hypocrisy more clearly.
You understand the difference between a meth head stabbing people at a bus stop and a person with a different political opinion being thrown into a psych ward, right? Because that was the first example you used in a post about the example I just compared it with in the last sentence, the topic of the OP.
Can you define what your point was? Because from my perspective, it just seemed like you're totally fine with the state going after differing political views by comparing them to actual psychotics. "No man, we need to ensure the state has ultimate control, bro." is what I read in your comments. Just read through them again and I can't not see it that way.
Go read my comment in reference to the OP and you'll begin to understand why I posted it:
I reject the notion that the state should be able to censor or imprison people for political opinions.
Am I to understand that because Cooper was a Marxist that the above bolded statement should be abandoned?
Have you read Political Ponerology?
I have not. Do you recommend?
Definitely.
Political Ponerology is a book written by Polish psychiatrist Andrzej Łobaczewski, who studied the psychological and social factors that lead to the rise of evil and tyranny in human history. The book is based on his personal experiences and research under the oppressive regimes of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
The main concept of the book is ponerology, which means the study of evil. Łobaczewski argues that evil is not a metaphysical or moral phenomenon, but a scientific and biological one. He claims that there are certain individuals who are born with genetic or acquired defects that make them incapable of empathy, conscience, or remorse. These individuals are called psychopaths or sociopaths, and they have a parasitic and predatory nature that allows them to manipulate, exploit, and destroy others for their own benefit.
Łobaczewski also explains how psychopaths can infiltrate and influence various social groups and institutions, such as political parties, religions, media, and corporations. He describes how they can use their charm, charisma, and cunning to deceive and seduce normal people into following their agenda. He also shows how they can create a system of pathocracy, which means a government or society ruled by psychopaths. In a pathocracy, normal people are oppressed, brainwashed, or eliminated, while psychopaths enjoy power, wealth, and privilege.
Łobaczewski warns that pathocracy is a recurrent and cyclical phenomenon in human history, and that it can only be prevented by increasing the awareness and knowledge of normal people about the nature and danger of psychopathy. He also suggests that normal people should develop their moral and psychological immunity against the influence of psychopaths, and that they should resist and oppose their tyranny with courage and solidarity.
Political Ponerology is a book that offers a unique and profound perspective on the causes and consequences of evil in human society. It is not an easy or pleasant read, but it is an important and enlightening one. It challenges us to question our assumptions and beliefs about ourselves and others, and to confront the reality of psychopathy in our world. It also inspires us to cultivate our humanity and morality, and to defend our dignity and freedom against the forces of evil.
you have to be crazy if you aren't a gay commie!
This is why I hesitate about the idea of bringing back forced institutionalization and mental asylums in modern America. It was a mistake to abandon these ideas post WWII, but bringing them back in the current era would lead to political dissidents getting institutionalized while the mentally insane homeless would be left free to rot on the streets.
The threat is literally that the inmates would be running the asylum.
Harassed for wrong-think.
Kind of reminds me of the movie The Trial.
A delusional belief, as classically defined by psychiatry, has always been a fixed, false idea that doesn't conform with cultural norms
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_DSM
We should probably remind leftist academics that they declared homosexuality a mental illness for many decades (probably centuries before the manual was first written...)
Remember when these guys built boats in fjords and conquered half of England?
mVikingz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_DSM
We should probably remind leftist academics that they declared homosexuality a mental illness for many decades.
They do not complain of masks Norway the consequences of their actions.
While I don't disagree, both this article and Anders are Norwegian.