Norway Man Forced Into Psychiatric Ward for 9 Days Due to Questioning mRNA Shots Online
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Thank god you have an anecdote that perfectly fits your worldview and your point. I'm sure that's not coincidental at all and has no effect on why you have such an extreme position, assuming its true. It really is so fortuitous you have such an exactly perfect example of the exact phenomenon you wish to tackle.
Didn't say otherwise. You seem to have rushed out a response in your emotional tantrum and forget to comprehend what I actually said.
Because basically everything you typed here "is just you making shit up trying to categorize shit you barely even understand," to use your words.
It is also very fortunate you found a literal self proclaimed "existential-Marxist" who broke away from his association for its lack of politics in operation, who coined the term anti-psychiatry to say any treatment is worse than just letting someone exist, and wrote his most famous book on abolishing the Family as it is an extension of the capitalist bourgeois and necessary to their indoctrination.
Since you think his words are so powerful that make an argument for you, I have to assume you agree with all those concepts as well since they color the entire foundation of him making that argument.
Or is that too much context for you now?
Did the scary man at the bus stop make you want to use the state to enforce your will on others?
Its okay to admit you didn't read a thing about the guy you quoted and were just trying to look smart. No one will make fun of you for trying to use a Marxist to advocate against the state.
The point made in the passage itself is key when the left begins its desire to throw 'invalid' political entities in reeducation camps.
Did you see the comment I was replying to? The topic of the post this comment is under? Pointing out the flaws of the left from the leftist perspective illustrates the hypocrisy more clearly.
You understand the difference between a meth head stabbing people at a bus stop and a person with a different political opinion being thrown into a psych ward, right? Because that was the first example you used in a post about the example I just compared it with in the last sentence, the topic of the OP.
Can you define what your point was? Because from my perspective, it just seemed like you're totally fine with the state going after differing political views by comparing them to actual psychotics. "No man, we need to ensure the state has ultimate control, bro." is what I read in your comments. Just read through them again and I can't not see it that way.
Go read my comment in reference to the OP and you'll begin to understand why I posted it:
I reject the notion that the state should be able to censor or imprison people for political opinions.
Am I to understand that because Cooper was a Marxist that the above bolded statement should be abandoned?
No my first example was that schizophrenia is so debilitating a condition that you can observe it crippling a person without any further context about their "opinions" or how they ended up in their position, nor often needing officially licensed "diagnosis" from the state to be able to say such.
I said it pretty clearly: People's abuse of an X doesn't invalidate X. Which you took as me saying its not being abused at all somehow. We are literally on a post about said abuse happening, so that much is a given.
Nowhere in any point I made did I propose any solution to anything or any condition you see, so your assertion that I was promoting the state in any way says more about your reading comprehension than anything I said. All I said was "hey this guy is dumb, schizophrenia is real" and then you had a temper tantrum about guys you know and unhinged rambling that I dared question your totally legit point that you illustrated so clearly by posting someone else's opinions.
You see, your initial reply kinda makes this current one not make sense. If you were just trying to post a Leftist perspective on a Leftist problem on it to point out the hypocrisy, why ramble on about your predictions based on how much you agree with him?
It means using him as an authority in any form is both retarded, and undermines the very point you are trying to make. Especially as you provided no context to him saying such, just posted his words as the entire post like they held weight enough to prove your point for you.
See, that's the issue with just posting 2 paragraphs of rambling African Moron and then adding nothing else. Its indistinguishable between the two camps of "look at this retarded Leftist perspective on this Leftist problem to illustrate something something hypocrisy!" and "this expert (he is an expert because I posted his profession to lend him additional weight on the topic) talked about this problem back in the 60s!"
But I guess its all okay. We apparently agree to begin with, and are only arguing now because you had a hissy fit, so there isn't any ground further to tread. Just petty insults.