Norway Man Forced Into Psychiatric Ward for 9 Days Due to Questioning mRNA Shots Online
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
No my first example was that schizophrenia is so debilitating a condition that you can observe it crippling a person without any further context about their "opinions" or how they ended up in their position, nor often needing officially licensed "diagnosis" from the state to be able to say such.
I said it pretty clearly: People's abuse of an X doesn't invalidate X. Which you took as me saying its not being abused at all somehow. We are literally on a post about said abuse happening, so that much is a given.
Nowhere in any point I made did I propose any solution to anything or any condition you see, so your assertion that I was promoting the state in any way says more about your reading comprehension than anything I said. All I said was "hey this guy is dumb, schizophrenia is real" and then you had a temper tantrum about guys you know and unhinged rambling that I dared question your totally legit point that you illustrated so clearly by posting someone else's opinions.
You see, your initial reply kinda makes this current one not make sense. If you were just trying to post a Leftist perspective on a Leftist problem on it to point out the hypocrisy, why ramble on about your predictions based on how much you agree with him?
It means using him as an authority in any form is both retarded, and undermines the very point you are trying to make. Especially as you provided no context to him saying such, just posted his words as the entire post like they held weight enough to prove your point for you.
See, that's the issue with just posting 2 paragraphs of rambling African Moron and then adding nothing else. Its indistinguishable between the two camps of "look at this retarded Leftist perspective on this Leftist problem to illustrate something something hypocrisy!" and "this expert (he is an expert because I posted his profession to lend him additional weight on the topic) talked about this problem back in the 60s!"
But I guess its all okay. We apparently agree to begin with, and are only arguing now because you had a hissy fit, so there isn't any ground further to tread. Just petty insults.
What was I supposed to add? It explains the phenomena fairly clearly regarding the OP. I had nothing to say about the replies you were going to leave. I could have maybe estimated the potential amount of disgust you would have had from seeing a marxist's name and perhaps I could have altered it to remove the triggering element you found displeasurable.
"Even the Commies themselves understood the abuse and problem." You know, like you claimed you were going for, and possibly showing you actually knew anything about the guy you were quoting (of which I doubt).
Because all of this stems from me not reading what you now claim to be your point for outright agreeing with his. Which isn't helped by you claiming to the guy pointing out your strawman fit that he was just a psychiatrist, a defense to his authority and expertise. A claim as fitting as saying Karen Horney was a psychologist with good ideas, leaving out all her ideas were whining fits after Freud said women had penis envy to her face.
Yes, at any moment you can say "thing bad when abused!" and be correct. I brought up Gun Control originally too for a reason, because literally every shooting that happens is "thing being abused!" but I doubt most here would agree that means Guns need to be removed to stop abuse.
But its all okay. You got mad, threw out a bunch of insults that didn't work, and then moved the goalpost to act smug about how my point wasn't clear somehow.
Go back to reddit, shill.
Lol