Norway Man Forced Into Psychiatric Ward for 9 Days Due to Questioning mRNA Shots Online
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
That was probably true in 1967 when they were mostly making shit up to try and categorize shit they barely even understood, but you can go to most bus stations and find someone who, without any context about them as a person, is obviously schizophrenic and unable to function.
Heck, you can just watch livestreams made by Terry Davis himself to see an extremely brilliant man cracking under schizophrenic episodes and devolving before your eyes into an incoherent mess. "I'm sorry for having to remember that I love you" is both the scariest and saddest sentence I've ever heard a man say.
People's abuse of an X doesn't invalidate X. This applies as equally to Psychological Issues as it does to Gun Control.
What you have done in this small snippet is exactly what schizophrenia is in most cases. I mean, the rest of that sentence is just you making shit up trying to categorize shit you barely even understand, to use your words.
It's much safer for most people to hold onto the belief that schizophrenia is purely a genetic disorder and not a sociopolitical designation of someone incapable of being placed into the machinery of industry without a mental or linguistic collapse. Without any change to our population, I predict that with the increase of 'socialism' there will be identical increases in the rates of 'schizophrenia' - just as it was in the USSR.
Heck, I know a 'schizophrenic' that is only deemed so because he was going to expose a secret that his brother kept from their family and it was more expedient to just have him committed rather than his brother losing his job, his wife and his kids. The brother with the secret is much more 'insane' than the brother who 'has schizophrenia'.
People's denial about the continuing abuse of X doesn't invalidate that X is still being abused.
If you don't care about how a person comes to a state of mind that scares you, you should have no say in what happens to that person or what they are called because you are acting from an emotional state of fear and ignorance.
Holy strawman argument, Batman.
The other poster made no argument from which a strawman could be derived. I posted source material from a psychiatrist and he hand waved it away using a bus stop generalization and Terry Davis as anecdotal examples. I countered with almost identical counterpositions of similar weight and dialectical style.
Thank god you have an anecdote that perfectly fits your worldview and your point. I'm sure that's not coincidental at all and has no effect on why you have such an extreme position, assuming its true. It really is so fortuitous you have such an exactly perfect example of the exact phenomenon you wish to tackle.
Didn't say otherwise. You seem to have rushed out a response in your emotional tantrum and forget to comprehend what I actually said.
Because basically everything you typed here "is just you making shit up trying to categorize shit you barely even understand," to use your words.
It is also very fortunate you found a literal self proclaimed "existential-Marxist" who broke away from his association for its lack of politics in operation, who coined the term anti-psychiatry to say any treatment is worse than just letting someone exist, and wrote his most famous book on abolishing the Family as it is an extension of the capitalist bourgeois and necessary to their indoctrination.
Since you think his words are so powerful that make an argument for you, I have to assume you agree with all those concepts as well since they color the entire foundation of him making that argument.
Or is that too much context for you now?
Did the scary man at the bus stop make you want to use the state to enforce your will on others?
Its okay to admit you didn't read a thing about the guy you quoted and were just trying to look smart. No one will make fun of you for trying to use a Marxist to advocate against the state.