Note that, in the fear porn cited, she was both able to contact authorities, and said authorities were able to find, apprehend, and convict the perpetrator, with an 18 year sentence.
It's not due to be debated until the 6th of September but I know they are keen to get two things done - as much authoritarian control as possible before it goes to Royal Assent and quickly as possible so they can implement their new powers swiftly.
Much like gun laws, they aren't satisfied until they've legislated hard enough that certain "evils" just cease to exist entirely. They think laws are like vaccines (the real ones) where once you get enough dose of one, small pox and measles just blips out of existence.
So the fact that "bad thing can happen" is a problem they want solved, even if that means literally stripping everyone of every bit of freedom that exists.
"Agree to abolish encryption and privacy or you support child abuse" is a disgraceful and irresponsible argument from emotion that authoritarians are using to justify the abolition of all our freedoms and rights.
You just claim "child abuse!!!!!" and both sides are often instantly swayed to do whatever you say. The wokies realized that a while ago, that's why literally everything was suddenly "lolicon pedo fantasy vibes." Including large chested women, liking women at all, any amount of 2D women existing.
And that aren't even wrong. Look at how easy they made the Right literally Civil War itself with the "loli" debate. So they aren't going to stop anytime soon either.
Things like this remind me of footbinding in China. It outlasted dynasties, and several emperors tried to stop it, along with all sorts of men who thought it stopped giving them good workers on the farm or just torturing their daughters for status. Several laws and even raids happened to stop this. Every time, the end of the dynasty had women with broken feet serving the emperor.
It was ended by harsh responses by Mao and his communist revolution, and yet we still find the odd lady who claims to be 104, but her birth certificate says 50. Her feet are broken and she loves the fame it brings. None of the men claim to like it except for a small magazine that couldn't find enough fans to keep going.
But if you ever bring it up today it is the biggest sign of patriarchy. These women were forced to break their feet in half for their fathers and uncles pleasure. No one ever mentions that women did it to their daughters, and how much the fathers complained about it. The only way to stop it today is to pass laws that say it will not happen again, even though the women talking about it seem to have very small feet. It becomes all glory to the insanity again.
This has always been the way that the state and their lackeys (namely media) push more and more state power. "Global Warming", "Covid", "Terrorism", etc, etc, etc. Fuck, does nobody remember Operation Northwoods for fucks sake? You think because JFK rejected them officially that such ideas also died officially?
The state uses their power to justify more state. Helping you is ALWAYS a very, VERY distant priority. And by priority, I mean entirely unintentional side-product unless it explicitly gives them more direct control (socialised healthcare for example is just another avenue of with-holding services for compliance, which is why they want as many people reliant upon it as possible).
This is the status quo, and has been going on like this for, most likely, longer than you were born.
Note that, in the fear porn cited, she was both able to contact authorities, and said authorities were able to find, apprehend, and convict the perpetrator, with an 18 year sentence.
This was done without the proposed law.
Sounds like the system was working just fine...
Due to the exponential growth in technology, this story could have been written at ANY point in the past 20 years about ANY country in the world.
Yet BBC "News" just does a CopyNPaste just days before the law is being debated.
It's not due to be debated until the 6th of September but I know they are keen to get two things done - as much authoritarian control as possible before it goes to Royal Assent and quickly as possible so they can implement their new powers swiftly.
Much like gun laws, they aren't satisfied until they've legislated hard enough that certain "evils" just cease to exist entirely. They think laws are like vaccines (the real ones) where once you get enough dose of one, small pox and measles just blips out of existence.
So the fact that "bad thing can happen" is a problem they want solved, even if that means literally stripping everyone of every bit of freedom that exists.
Lol at them pretending to care about grooming.
yeah, they're bitching about sound of freedom talking about groomers.
"Agree to abolish encryption and privacy or you support child abuse" is a disgraceful and irresponsible argument from emotion that authoritarians are using to justify the abolition of all our freedoms and rights.
People who are that dishonest deserve violence and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
Its the most effective argument.
You just claim "child abuse!!!!!" and both sides are often instantly swayed to do whatever you say. The wokies realized that a while ago, that's why literally everything was suddenly "lolicon pedo fantasy vibes." Including large chested women, liking women at all, any amount of 2D women existing.
And that aren't even wrong. Look at how easy they made the Right literally Civil War itself with the "loli" debate. So they aren't going to stop anytime soon either.
Yes - according to the rules of the oppression olympics-
Racism is a much bigger concern than being gang raped and have the police look the other way to be politically correct
Things like this remind me of footbinding in China. It outlasted dynasties, and several emperors tried to stop it, along with all sorts of men who thought it stopped giving them good workers on the farm or just torturing their daughters for status. Several laws and even raids happened to stop this. Every time, the end of the dynasty had women with broken feet serving the emperor.
It was ended by harsh responses by Mao and his communist revolution, and yet we still find the odd lady who claims to be 104, but her birth certificate says 50. Her feet are broken and she loves the fame it brings. None of the men claim to like it except for a small magazine that couldn't find enough fans to keep going.
But if you ever bring it up today it is the biggest sign of patriarchy. These women were forced to break their feet in half for their fathers and uncles pleasure. No one ever mentions that women did it to their daughters, and how much the fathers complained about it. The only way to stop it today is to pass laws that say it will not happen again, even though the women talking about it seem to have very small feet. It becomes all glory to the insanity again.
Government:
Hot take: The Sound of Freedom was a psyop to help push people into accepting laws like this being passed
The BBC is British government propaganda just like RT is Russian Government propaganda, there isn´t too much difference in between them.
This has always been the way that the state and their lackeys (namely media) push more and more state power. "Global Warming", "Covid", "Terrorism", etc, etc, etc. Fuck, does nobody remember Operation Northwoods for fucks sake? You think because JFK rejected them officially that such ideas also died officially?
The state uses their power to justify more state. Helping you is ALWAYS a very, VERY distant priority. And by priority, I mean entirely unintentional side-product unless it explicitly gives them more direct control (socialised healthcare for example is just another avenue of with-holding services for compliance, which is why they want as many people reliant upon it as possible).
This is the status quo, and has been going on like this for, most likely, longer than you were born.
We'll all be south korea very soon