I think his prediction is dead on, but anti-Christian bias will be pretty low on the list of reasons why. He obviously can't say this, but Hollywood's pedo problem is the real reason Sound of Freedom won't get any awards. I don't blame him for not bringing it up. They killed Joan Rivers for far less.
She didn't die of natural causes. She died during a minor throat procedure in an outpatient clinic that was suspiciously botched just weeks after she outed Big Mike.
What is more likely, a 'botched operation' leading to the death of a vulnerable 81-year-old woman, or Michelle Obama secretly being a man, somehow arranging to have kids without anyone knowing that they aren't hers long before anyone knew who Obama was, and then arranging for the murder of a woman who said something about it?
Then again, just the fact that Obama wasn't a big deal then is not a good a good excuse.
I mean, he was connected to people like Bill Ayers. If you think he wasn't groomed to become important, then I think you are very naive.
I'm also not going to disagree with you. I wouldn't be surprised either way. Though I do find it funnier if it turns out that she's the ugliest beard alive.
Who the fuck cares about Oscars? Nobody watches the damn ceremonies anymore (Will Smith bitch-slapping Chris Rock was the most entertaining thing to come out of it in years), general audiences have grown savvy that Oscar-winning movies equates to boring and pretentious, and movie stars are becoming less relevant everyday. I see winning an Oscar as a detriment.
I saw the movie. I appreciate the awareness it’s bringing and the message behind it, but certainly not a showcase for award winning filmmaking, writing, acting or visual effects.
Predicting it won’t win an Oscar is an easy prediction but saying it’s because of bias is a bit much.
I agree Oscars are woke and probably anti-Christian.
I agree Hollywood has pro-pedophile tones.
However, I sadly disagree that this film would be worthy of a top award in any category. Lots of elements of this film felt amateurish despite the passion behind it and its concept being solid.
Christfags trying to fight for top spot in the Victim Olympics, I see. C'mon guys, you were number one for centuries, let the progressives have a turn!
I think his prediction is dead on, but anti-Christian bias will be pretty low on the list of reasons why. He obviously can't say this, but Hollywood's pedo problem is the real reason Sound of Freedom won't get any awards. I don't blame him for not bringing it up. They killed Joan Rivers for far less.
There's no way an 81-year-old woman would die of natural causes.
She didn't die of natural causes. She died during a minor throat procedure in an outpatient clinic that was suspiciously botched just weeks after she outed Big Mike.
What is more likely, a 'botched operation' leading to the death of a vulnerable 81-year-old woman, or Michelle Obama secretly being a man, somehow arranging to have kids without anyone knowing that they aren't hers long before anyone knew who Obama was, and then arranging for the murder of a woman who said something about it?
Then again, just the fact that Obama wasn't a big deal then is not a good a good excuse.
I mean, he was connected to people like Bill Ayers. If you think he wasn't groomed to become important, then I think you are very naive.
I don't think very many people sincerely think Michelle Obama is a man. It's just funny. And she's really damn ugly.
But I do believe that the Obamas are petty enough that they'd have someone offed for offending him.
Nah I'll say it with complete sincerety and conviction. That is not a female. Even as astonishingly ugly as black women that's on a whole other level.
Fair enough, but I didn't say "nobody".
I'm also not going to disagree with you. I wouldn't be surprised either way. Though I do find it funnier if it turns out that she's the ugliest beard alive.
You think it's unlikely that a well known mafioso would have someone killed for exposing a secret?
They killed Joan Rivers because she said “Michelle” Obama is a man.
By anti-Christian, they mean anti-people who investigate the you-know-whos.
Huh, I'd have thought the pedos in the audience, committee and a few hosts would have been the reason but sure let's call it anti-christian bias..
I... don't think the bias is anti-Christian, but rather pro-p...
Propaganda. Surely you mean.
Who the fuck cares about Oscars? Nobody watches the damn ceremonies anymore (Will Smith bitch-slapping Chris Rock was the most entertaining thing to come out of it in years), general audiences have grown savvy that Oscar-winning movies equates to boring and pretentious, and movie stars are becoming less relevant everyday. I see winning an Oscar as a detriment.
The Chris Rock slap was staged to drive up ratings.
I saw the movie. I appreciate the awareness it’s bringing and the message behind it, but certainly not a showcase for award winning filmmaking, writing, acting or visual effects.
Predicting it won’t win an Oscar is an easy prediction but saying it’s because of bias is a bit much.
I agree Oscars are woke and probably anti-Christian.
I agree Hollywood has pro-pedophile tones.
However, I sadly disagree that this film would be worthy of a top award in any category. Lots of elements of this film felt amateurish despite the passion behind it and its concept being solid.
Well by that measure, it would fit in perfectly with a whole lot of previous Oscar winners.
The real reason behind the stonewalling is self-preservation.
don't care. I already bet the next oscar will have less viewership, even with all the barbie shilling
Christfags trying to fight for top spot in the Victim Olympics, I see. C'mon guys, you were number one for centuries, let the progressives have a turn!