It’s almost like the left intentionally bastardized scientific language then flipped shit when people didn’t use their new false definitions. There’s no such thing as cisgender, there’s no such thing as transgender, these are all massive lies that are the equivalent of calling a fetus not a human.
No such thing as gender as a property of people, it is only a property of words in a gendered language.
If you really want to get spicy you can state the fact that "sexuality" is a false concept made up by perverts to justify their degeneracy. There is no "straight" and "gay". There is only normal and sodomite. "Who you love" is irrelevant, it only matters with whom you have cock interaction.
I'm fine with someone using either term for a fertilized egg, as it is more of a moral question that underlines the issue.
That being said, the reason the Left are trying to thin out the meaning behind the language is to make sure you don't feel emotional attachment to a child they want to kill (or rape).
When are we going to start making communists scared again? And how? I need them to stop being such confident, condescending cunts. They need to be just as afraid of showing their faces/true colors as any neo Nazi shit
“Fetus” simply means “offspring.” The distinction is entirely arbitrary and invented by people like yourself who want to justify atrocities. You play the same bullshit language games that the trans activists play. They can’t define “woman.” You can’t define “person.” Hey feminists: what is a person?
Except not really. Fetus has primarily meant unborn/unhatched since 14th century and called an infant or baby after birth/hatching.
The problem isn't leftists using the wrong word, but them dehumanizing a fetus into a thing that can be killed without even blinking. What Walsh could have said is "unborn baby" to indicate he's talking about a human being before birth rather than the way they think of it as "clump of cells".
I meant more the part about being squirrely about defining 'person.' He might not have gotten it all the way right, but I think the core point is worthwhile.
It's nice to see foundational logic preserved manually when it is being just as manually destroyed. But at the same time, don't you get tired of pretending that all their challenges to western culture are really about the public facing rationalization of the newest destructive policy of the day? It is obviously a battle with excuses and justifications being drawn retroactive to the motives. If you take every belief they have and draw one common aspect, you have the fact that European people's are bad and should go away. If you state that in more mature terms, you get to rule 16 real quick.
And this is why we don't simp for TERFs.
And for celebrities in general. Narvatilova is famous for... running around a court and hitting a ball pretty well for being a woman. Yeah, good job.
Also, her bio says
Yeah uh, I don't see why I should care about her opinions on anything.
She's a lesbian.
No wonder she’s so angry
You can't spell TERF without Radical Feminist.
It’s almost like the left intentionally bastardized scientific language then flipped shit when people didn’t use their new false definitions. There’s no such thing as cisgender, there’s no such thing as transgender, these are all massive lies that are the equivalent of calling a fetus not a human.
No such thing as gender as a property of people, it is only a property of words in a gendered language.
If you really want to get spicy you can state the fact that "sexuality" is a false concept made up by perverts to justify their degeneracy. There is no "straight" and "gay". There is only normal and sodomite. "Who you love" is irrelevant, it only matters with whom you have cock interaction.
I'm fine with someone using either term for a fertilized egg, as it is more of a moral question that underlines the issue.
That being said, the reason the Left are trying to thin out the meaning behind the language is to make sure you don't feel emotional attachment to a child they want to kill (or rape).
Let the TERFS fight the trans but use the time they fight to prepare the artillery to glass both ideologies into irrelevancy.
Both have harmed too many people to exist, like communism.
All of liberalism needs to be rooted out.
When are we going to start making communists scared again? And how? I need them to stop being such confident, condescending cunts. They need to be just as afraid of showing their faces/true colors as any neo Nazi shit
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1683814368415186947
Will What is a Person? be his next film?
Oof. That's a good one and they wouldn't like it at all.
I know something that isn't a person: Communists.
Say what you want about Matt Walsh - and I certainly don't like some of what he has to say - but he's got some damn good zingers.
Except not really. Fetus has primarily meant unborn/unhatched since 14th century and called an infant or baby after birth/hatching.
The problem isn't leftists using the wrong word, but them dehumanizing a fetus into a thing that can be killed without even blinking. What Walsh could have said is "unborn baby" to indicate he's talking about a human being before birth rather than the way they think of it as "clump of cells".
I meant more the part about being squirrely about defining 'person.' He might not have gotten it all the way right, but I think the core point is worthwhile.
Oh I clicked on the twitter link and couldn't see Walsh's original comment bc twitter.
There's really nothing wrong with Matt's phrasing because "dead babies" is a superset of "dead fetus" in this context.
Lesbian opinion discarded.
That "who cares" is so big it can be seen from space, Martina
It's nice to see foundational logic preserved manually when it is being just as manually destroyed. But at the same time, don't you get tired of pretending that all their challenges to western culture are really about the public facing rationalization of the newest destructive policy of the day? It is obviously a battle with excuses and justifications being drawn retroactive to the motives. If you take every belief they have and draw one common aspect, you have the fact that European people's are bad and should go away. If you state that in more mature terms, you get to rule 16 real quick.
Wow she's taken the side of... Nobody