I represent a marginalized group. It's referred to as the people who used to be able to buy and sell property and had property rights.
If I have to be forced to sell it to someone that that lowballs me, I might become upset and that property could spontaneously combust somehow after the sale. Which I guess could be considered cultural enrichment, knowing how these stooges think.
Actually, that's offensive to both The Three Stooges and The Stooges.
Warning, bias alert. I'm currently saving for a house, so take this with a grain of salt.
I can't tell if I'm opposed to this, and I'll tell you why. Right now in Ontario, housing prices are absolutely insane. Buying a decent house feels more and more out of reach as the average price of detached homes over 100 km / 70 miles from Toronto are approaching $1 million.
One of the many reasons that prices continue to skyrocket is that investors are renovating and flipping homes or buying and holding homes as investment properties. These people have substantial networth already and obviously have primary residences, but the sum of their efforts are pricing out lower and middle class families. Keep in mind as well that there are significantly fewer houses than there are prospective buying families, so as soon as you add in rich investors buying multiple houses to flip of lease or rent or turn into an AirBnB, the demand so outpaces the supply that prices go up without a ceiling.
A move like what the Dutch government proposes here may prevent the obscene house-hoarding investment culture that we have in Ontario. I can't say for sure, though.
But what the Dutch are proposing sounds like race based Price controls.
Price controls never work.
The solution to your problem is the famous supply and demand equation. Ontario has a lot of rules to prevent new buildings being built. This reduces the supply.
Houston is famous for having very few restrictions on new houses being built. And always avoided housing bubbles more than many other areas.
If it's race-based, I wholeheartedly agree. Of course, assessing based on income or socioeconimic status could just become a proxy for race.
To your point on supply and demand, I'd tend to agree as well except that we're facing extremely high immigration rates. Also, keep in mind that these policies actually favour developers. They now get to build fewer homes but make as much money as they otherwise would because the prices have been ballooning that quickly (prices have effectively doubled in five years).
It looks like the most practical approach now is to just leave, but people fleeing doesn't improve the situation.
But what the Dutch are proposing sounds like race based Price controls.
Just pointing out, we're so used to "marginalized" meaning racism in the US it's understandable but I can't find anywhere that it says race rather than income -
This concerns owner-occupied homes up to 355,000 euros, the AD writes . These may no longer be sold to just anyone. Instead, the municipality can force a house below this price to go to a buyer with a middle or low income.
What happened with the farmers winning in the recent election?
They got the most seats (not a majority) in the regional elections. National government is still run by Eurocrats and WEFtards.
Sounds like their regional forces are going to have to nut up very soon.
I represent a marginalized group. It's referred to as the people who used to be able to buy and sell property and had property rights.
If I have to be forced to sell it to someone that that lowballs me, I might become upset and that property could spontaneously combust somehow after the sale. Which I guess could be considered cultural enrichment, knowing how these stooges think.
Actually, that's offensive to both The Three Stooges and The Stooges.
And that's how I conquered the Dutch!
Believe it or not, this is the same reason why Goldwater opposed the 1964 Civil Rights act.
dutch farmers need to start taking scalps.
Warning, bias alert. I'm currently saving for a house, so take this with a grain of salt.
I can't tell if I'm opposed to this, and I'll tell you why. Right now in Ontario, housing prices are absolutely insane. Buying a decent house feels more and more out of reach as the average price of detached homes over 100 km / 70 miles from Toronto are approaching $1 million.
One of the many reasons that prices continue to skyrocket is that investors are renovating and flipping homes or buying and holding homes as investment properties. These people have substantial networth already and obviously have primary residences, but the sum of their efforts are pricing out lower and middle class families. Keep in mind as well that there are significantly fewer houses than there are prospective buying families, so as soon as you add in rich investors buying multiple houses to flip of lease or rent or turn into an AirBnB, the demand so outpaces the supply that prices go up without a ceiling.
A move like what the Dutch government proposes here may prevent the obscene house-hoarding investment culture that we have in Ontario. I can't say for sure, though.
I'm sympathetic to your situation.
But what the Dutch are proposing sounds like race based Price controls.
Price controls never work.
The solution to your problem is the famous supply and demand equation. Ontario has a lot of rules to prevent new buildings being built. This reduces the supply.
Houston is famous for having very few restrictions on new houses being built. And always avoided housing bubbles more than many other areas.
If it's race-based, I wholeheartedly agree. Of course, assessing based on income or socioeconimic status could just become a proxy for race.
To your point on supply and demand, I'd tend to agree as well except that we're facing extremely high immigration rates. Also, keep in mind that these policies actually favour developers. They now get to build fewer homes but make as much money as they otherwise would because the prices have been ballooning that quickly (prices have effectively doubled in five years).
It looks like the most practical approach now is to just leave, but people fleeing doesn't improve the situation.
Just pointing out, we're so used to "marginalized" meaning racism in the US it's understandable but I can't find anywhere that it says race rather than income -
This concerns owner-occupied homes up to 355,000 euros, the AD writes . These may no longer be sold to just anyone. Instead, the municipality can force a house below this price to go to a buyer with a middle or low income.
There's always Greenland