Lefty who think she has a point
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
They are saying that such shirts pushes “straightness” onto a baby. Ignoring the fact this is a joke and also ignoring the fact that despite decades of propaganda, heterosexuality is the norm.
I wondered if they were implying that this piece of clothing sexualizes children somehow. Either way I don't see what any of that has to do with promoting faggotry and fake identities based on mental illness.
Me neither. Plus heterosexuality is the norm so according to stats your baby is most likely to be straight. So that cute joke is fine
I think this is it. It's clearly a joke in this case. But honestly I'd be fine ditching stuff like this if it meant stopping their side's grooming. Somehow I doubt that they would agree to those terms...
This is a good example of how we got here.
This is obviously a joke; no one is trying to get anyone to date their infant and, obviously, the infant doesn't understand what it says.
However, it is still sexualizing kids and, even if it's not intentionally predatory, it's cringe as hell.
Why make your own child into a joke? How far of a stretch is it from making fun of your infant child to making a slut of your child? Not as far as I'd like.
We've all seen these types of baby clothes, but who actually asked for them? Anyone? Or did some (((marketter))) convince people to buy them?
Are they reinforcing the stereotype that blue is a "boy colour"? Cause that's sexist.
Maybe they are.
I once had the misfortune of coming across the term "female fetish", as in claiming the sexual attraction to females, as a male, is a fetish.
they really don't see the difference between homosexuality, a preference with no procreative value, and heterosexuality, which literally continues the species
They might simply be nihilistic enough to just not value continuing the species.
Of course. Sex is recreational to them so anything that would get in the way of their recreation is an annoyance at best. (hence their views on everything from abortion to whether it's OK to not want to have sex with various types of people.) It's "just" a way to have fun with someone else after all. No more meaning to it than there's meaning in getting a drink of water.
Also ignoring that fashion is almost exclusively controlled by gay men.
Ok yeah this is confusing, the clothing itself isn't sexual, it's standard baby/toddler gear to allow easy crawling and possibly walking. The phrase is in the dad joke category and doesn't use any vulgar language.
This is reaching harder than a pro rock climber..
Leftists, being mindless automata, are bereft of humour.
The point to be made here is parents want their children to be straight. They're allowed to "force" it on their children until they're 18. That's parenting. Fags seethe.
It's also not sexualizing the baby. But I think the first point is more important.
Another way to put it is: Short of child abuse, you have no right to tell people how to raise their kids.
Your first point is wrong. It's not even about the kids. It's a joke for the parents who are literate, where the child is not. Moreover, the parents wanting their kids to be straight isn't correct. The parents assume their kids are straight because that should be the case the vast and sweeping majority of the the time.
Is this the part where someone has to tell her that babies can't read, and that joke is for the parent's sake? Y'know, those grown up people who are going to have to buy the kid clothes for the next 6-8 years until the kid shows enough independence to be able to pick their own.
Y'know, that sort of thing? Because that's where the joke is, and who it's for.
Having adult language and adult themes on clothes for kids will just make people who know what that is on the clothes feel uncomfortable at worst and awkward at best.
I don't get it.
They are saying that straight people are grooming their children into heterosexuality by sexualizing children with these shirts.
Moreover, it is possible that they think that no one is innately heteroseuxal, and this form of messaging is the only mechanism by which heterosexuality develops.
🤦♂️
Luckily, no one has to have straightness “forced” upon them.
If you str8's aren't grooming your children into being heterosexual, then why do you let your kids suck women's tits?
Checkmate, atheist.
totally the same thing as having men in fetish gear twerk in a child's face.
Also sold at Target..?