Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

32
Lefty who think she has a point (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 3 years ago by AlfredicEnglishRules 3 years ago by AlfredicEnglishRules +32 / -0
25 comments download share
25 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ 34 ▼
– Smith1980 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0

They are saying that such shirts pushes “straightness” onto a baby. Ignoring the fact this is a joke and also ignoring the fact that despite decades of propaganda, heterosexuality is the norm.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Assassin47 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

I wondered if they were implying that this piece of clothing sexualizes children somehow. Either way I don't see what any of that has to do with promoting faggotry and fake identities based on mental illness.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Smith1980 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Me neither. Plus heterosexuality is the norm so according to stats your baby is most likely to be straight. So that cute joke is fine

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I think this is it. It's clearly a joke in this case. But honestly I'd be fine ditching stuff like this if it meant stopping their side's grooming. Somehow I doubt that they would agree to those terms...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

This is a good example of how we got here.

This is obviously a joke; no one is trying to get anyone to date their infant and, obviously, the infant doesn't understand what it says.

However, it is still sexualizing kids and, even if it's not intentionally predatory, it's cringe as hell.

Why make your own child into a joke? How far of a stretch is it from making fun of your infant child to making a slut of your child? Not as far as I'd like.

We've all seen these types of baby clothes, but who actually asked for them? Anyone? Or did some (((marketter))) convince people to buy them?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Are they reinforcing the stereotype that blue is a "boy colour"? Cause that's sexist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Smith1980 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Maybe they are.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I once had the misfortune of coming across the term "female fetish", as in claiming the sexual attraction to females, as a male, is a fetish.

they really don't see the difference between homosexuality, a preference with no procreative value, and heterosexuality, which literally continues the species

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– APDSmith 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

They might simply be nihilistic enough to just not value continuing the species.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

they really don't see the difference between homosexuality, a preference with no procreative value, and heterosexuality, which literally continues the species

Of course. Sex is recreational to them so anything that would get in the way of their recreation is an annoyance at best. (hence their views on everything from abortion to whether it's OK to not want to have sex with various types of people.) It's "just" a way to have fun with someone else after all. No more meaning to it than there's meaning in getting a drink of water.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Kaarous 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Also ignoring that fashion is almost exclusively controlled by gay men.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy