Consider me a single issue voter in regard to the totally illegal counter-A1 bill he signed in israel. I will never intentionally act to help such a person be President, if it were locked in as him vs Biden I would just turn away. I almost feel the same way about Trump for that matter, but not quite, because there is plausible deniability in his actions, plausible fumbling and bumbling, his eagerness to pander in petty but bold-faced ways to demonstrate how he "loves, just loves" x or y group.
This does not exist with desantis and the definitive, conclusive stance he took on the most basic human right his voters have. How can I ever assume his willingness or ability to defend my interest against leftist censors when he himself has practically out-done all of them up to this point?
If he had a red button he could press to end all child drag queen shows forever, and he pressed it, I would still never vote for him, because eliminating one mcguffin doesn't justify his continued presence when, for all I know, he could and would at any time and on any issue sign off my right to fucking talk.
Since his console apparently has a "ban pleb freedom" button right next to the "pwn da libs on Fox News distraction issue" button, I would rather him fuck right off even if it meant the desired button doesn't get pressed right that moment.
Focusing on the McGuffin, and then using that focus to do something more heinous is always the Neo-Liberal (Fabian Socialist) way.
Take a look at their "TikTok Ban" attempt. They would have allowed TikTok to continue operating, never mentioned it in the bill, and then would have tried to create a full regulatory bureaucracy over the internet. They pulled the same shit years ago with claims about Child Porn... never once mentioning how at the same time the CIA director was meeting with Jeffery Epstein regularly for private contacts.
Okay, so as a comparison, Trump got bump stock bans, and didn't fire fauci et al and enabled the clot shots.
Literally no candidate is going to be perfect, and being anti Florida man over this is... One of the more retarded things I've seen.
Is the bill dumb? Kinda, yeah. But littering was already a crime, and always has been.
Is trump going to lose, again, because he's an awful candidate? Yep.
Is DeSantis going to win? I dunno, but better odds for him than trump, and I think DeSantis would clear house instead of letting the rot set in like trump did.
How bout you take a wild guess and have a hearty laugh dumbass, I don't give a shit. I'll try and remember the time a literal opinion was banned by an American state and some asshole asked me why that's illegal like the sun is shining out of that gov't ass
Go practice your disgusting pilpul chutzpah game on chatgpt. Or do you want to start again and have discussion? I will pretend I don't think you are actual scum based on what I'm willing to call a false start.
It's largely redundant because you already said engineering and manual labor, but they are overrepresented in everything except things that actually matter. Media/Entertainment, law makers, politicians, bankers, hr. You'd be hard pressed to find a jew doing anything that produces anything that makes the world better.
"Fighting antisemitism" means no free speech. This is simply getting in front of any actual resistance to "current year" and trying to co-opt it. It's like saying "I will deal with every symptom of the disease except the root causes"
This is what I don't understand about the OnlyTrumpers many of whom constantly say that they despise Jewish hegemony over the west and they laughably end up cheerleading the most pro Jewish and Zionist President in modern history, Donald J. Trump.
Many of them are going to be challenged in court, and some seem like red meat that's going to get overturned or be made irrelevant.
For example: outlawing CBDC: The state of Florida has no mechanism to do anything about CBDC's. If the Federal Treasury decides to move to a CDBC (Let's call them DigiDollars), there is no mechanism to stop anything from engaging in trade or contracts with the CDBC. I'm fairly certain that if Florida brought suit against two private entities for fulfilling a contract in DigiDollars, they'd be raked over the coals in Federal Court.
Best you can do, as a state, is say that you won't prosecute contracts fulfilled in other currencies if both parties agree to it. The Feds will invent reasons to come after you for that, but you're not over-stepping your jurisdictional grounds.
Digidollars are just barter. If I trade many CarrotCoin for one FixMyRoofCoin, or if I leave "coin" off the end, it's all just barter trade. And it is taxed at the real-dollar-value of those barter trades, in theory.
You don't need to overcomplicate things. You owe taxes in your country's currency, but you can do business in whatever currency you want, as long as you provide that payment at year-end, 10% for the big guy.
You can't outlaw barter trade, because almost everything is barter trade on some level.
This isn't about who's the best, but the least worst. Both can be bad. In fact, I struggle to think of a single GOP/Republican/Conservative President candidate that's all good. Trump went downhill, DeSantis has been playing both sides, and many of the rest are just RINO's.
And the problem with people sniping each other for not being perfect candidates is that we aren't just fighting each other. The Left will be there, with their guy ready to make things infinitely worse than almost any of our failures could.
Leftists are going to jerk each other raw over whoever the candidate is. The right, collectively, needs to endorse candidates who can both win and push things more to the right.
The issue being, is that the Right will continue to purity spiral itself into never winning because "he had a meal with a black guy once PASS CUCK WORTHLESS."
Without realizing that while X candidate is kinda pro-women and Jew, the alternative from the Left is obscenely pro both those and everything you don't want. And in a winner take all situation you can't get pure representative, its always maybe bad versus for sure bad.
He's not, he's being a shill because he's a NeoLiberal infiltrator (in my opinion). He rants about black people to try and boost his cred among the ConPro types, and then pushes NeoLiberalist policies. This is what makes me concerned about supporting DeSantis. I feel like there's a strong online push for him, only from bad actors.
If the base wants to guarantee that we lose 2024, they nominate Trump again.
If the base wants a chance of unseating Joe Biden they will nominate DeSantis.
Winning 2024 is what truly matters, Trump has ZERO shot of winning AZ, GA and WI in the general election. Without those states there is no electoral college victory.
Electability is the key metric and it is clear that DeSantis is better in it.
If you are someone who wants to ignore electability, then we can look at other metrics like overall competence, personnel selection skills and results achieved from both DeSantis and Trump, it is clear that DeSantis is still superior.
They don't understand that America First dies if we lose the 2024 general election.
If Trump is the nominee in 2024 he will lose and by the 2028 primaries, MAGA as a movement will be essentially dead.
I have my gripes with the MAGA movement but not with the actual policies, I think the policies are great.
It is sad that the MAGA movement has completely turned into a personality cult around Trump focusing on one man instead of saving the country.
Smooth talking toxic grifters like Kari Lake will run MAGA into the ground.
If DeSantis wins 2024, MAGA's desired policies will persist. Only Trumpers don't understand what happens if Trump is the 2024 nominee. He will lose the general.
If Trump is the nominee and loses 2024, it is very likely that the 2028 ticket will end up being a Youngkin-Kemp ticket and we will win 2028 but we won't get anything resembling MAGA policies.
Consider me a single issue voter in regard to the totally illegal counter-A1 bill he signed in israel. I will never intentionally act to help such a person be President, if it were locked in as him vs Biden I would just turn away. I almost feel the same way about Trump for that matter, but not quite, because there is plausible deniability in his actions, plausible fumbling and bumbling, his eagerness to pander in petty but bold-faced ways to demonstrate how he "loves, just loves" x or y group.
This does not exist with desantis and the definitive, conclusive stance he took on the most basic human right his voters have. How can I ever assume his willingness or ability to defend my interest against leftist censors when he himself has practically out-done all of them up to this point?
If he had a red button he could press to end all child drag queen shows forever, and he pressed it, I would still never vote for him, because eliminating one mcguffin doesn't justify his continued presence when, for all I know, he could and would at any time and on any issue sign off my right to fucking talk.
Since his console apparently has a "ban pleb freedom" button right next to the "pwn da libs on Fox News distraction issue" button, I would rather him fuck right off even if it meant the desired button doesn't get pressed right that moment.
Focusing on the McGuffin, and then using that focus to do something more heinous is always the Neo-Liberal (Fabian Socialist) way.
Take a look at their "TikTok Ban" attempt. They would have allowed TikTok to continue operating, never mentioned it in the bill, and then would have tried to create a full regulatory bureaucracy over the internet. They pulled the same shit years ago with claims about Child Porn... never once mentioning how at the same time the CIA director was meeting with Jeffery Epstein regularly for private contacts.
Okay, so as a comparison, Trump got bump stock bans, and didn't fire fauci et al and enabled the clot shots.
Literally no candidate is going to be perfect, and being anti Florida man over this is... One of the more retarded things I've seen.
Is the bill dumb? Kinda, yeah. But littering was already a crime, and always has been.
Is trump going to lose, again, because he's an awful candidate? Yep.
Is DeSantis going to win? I dunno, but better odds for him than trump, and I think DeSantis would clear house instead of letting the rot set in like trump did.
I think i aptly defined those actions as something distinct from the illegal bill desantis signed.
Okay, so explain the bill and explain why it's illegal.
I want you to actually (in your own words) do this. If you can't, then I'm going to laugh in your face.
How bout you take a wild guess and have a hearty laugh dumbass, I don't give a shit. I'll try and remember the time a literal opinion was banned by an American state and some asshole asked me why that's illegal like the sun is shining out of that gov't ass
Cool, so you can't, because you're a giant faggot. Thanks for the confirmation.
Protip: If you can't explain a bill, you probably don't know shit about it.
Just confirming: Your argument is DeSantis is smarter and/or wiser than Trump, therefore he is a worse candidate to vote for in your eyes?
Go practice your disgusting pilpul chutzpah game on chatgpt. Or do you want to start again and have discussion? I will pretend I don't think you are actual scum based on what I'm willing to call a false start.
That antisemitism law is sinister as fuck.
Jews are overly represented, period. Except maybe in engineering and manual labour.
It's largely redundant because you already said engineering and manual labor, but they are overrepresented in everything except things that actually matter. Media/Entertainment, law makers, politicians, bankers, hr. You'd be hard pressed to find a jew doing anything that produces anything that makes the world better.
"Fighting antisemitism" means no free speech. This is simply getting in front of any actual resistance to "current year" and trying to co-opt it. It's like saying "I will deal with every symptom of the disease except the root causes"
Name 1 politician who doesn't work for the jews & has better than a snowballs in hell's chance of winning.
Don't you dare say Trump. He was the most pro-jewish President in modern history. He practically turned his policy over to Kushner as time went on.
This is what I don't understand about the OnlyTrumpers many of whom constantly say that they despise Jewish hegemony over the west and they laughably end up cheerleading the most pro Jewish and Zionist President in modern history, Donald J. Trump.
I can't speak to the quality of each of these laws but damn do they sound like they hit every target you could want.
Many of them are going to be challenged in court, and some seem like red meat that's going to get overturned or be made irrelevant.
For example: outlawing CBDC: The state of Florida has no mechanism to do anything about CBDC's. If the Federal Treasury decides to move to a CDBC (Let's call them DigiDollars), there is no mechanism to stop anything from engaging in trade or contracts with the CDBC. I'm fairly certain that if Florida brought suit against two private entities for fulfilling a contract in DigiDollars, they'd be raked over the coals in Federal Court.
Best you can do, as a state, is say that you won't prosecute contracts fulfilled in other currencies if both parties agree to it. The Feds will invent reasons to come after you for that, but you're not over-stepping your jurisdictional grounds.
Digidollars are just barter. If I trade many CarrotCoin for one FixMyRoofCoin, or if I leave "coin" off the end, it's all just barter trade. And it is taxed at the real-dollar-value of those barter trades, in theory.
You don't need to overcomplicate things. You owe taxes in your country's currency, but you can do business in whatever currency you want, as long as you provide that payment at year-end, 10% for the big guy.
You can't outlaw barter trade, because almost everything is barter trade on some level.
That 10% to the big guy is the problem, and why gifts and inherentence are taxed as well.
But none of that changes that the State of Florida can't do anything about a CBDC.
> All that shit
> Fighting counter-semitism
One of these things is not like the other.
Another rebrand? You should be like your allies and call yourselves Semite Critical.
This isn't about who's the best, but the least worst. Both can be bad. In fact, I struggle to think of a single GOP/Republican/Conservative President candidate that's all good. Trump went downhill, DeSantis has been playing both sides, and many of the rest are just RINO's.
And the problem with people sniping each other for not being perfect candidates is that we aren't just fighting each other. The Left will be there, with their guy ready to make things infinitely worse than almost any of our failures could.
Leftists are going to jerk each other raw over whoever the candidate is. The right, collectively, needs to endorse candidates who can both win and push things more to the right.
The issue being, is that the Right will continue to purity spiral itself into never winning because "he had a meal with a black guy once PASS CUCK WORTHLESS."
Without realizing that while X candidate is kinda pro-women and Jew, the alternative from the Left is obscenely pro both those and everything you don't want. And in a winner take all situation you can't get pure representative, its always maybe bad versus for sure bad.
Yeah, well, we're letting the trump tards throw a temper tantrum instead of running better candidates who might actually win.
We lost a number of winnable races because they were massive trump candidates.
We also did lose two because the GOP pulled funding, and I'll happily blame the rnc for that too.
It's a cult, just as much as the leftists are in one.
A lot of fancy headlines, but in reality, he's achieved little on his main policy targets.
Attacking ESG? Check the FL public pension portfolio. Plenty of ESG scores over 70.
DeSimptis is only good as a shill for women's non-issues. He'd be electable in the UK.
Couldve sworn a decent chunk of legislation he passed was blocked up by the courts as well.
That's just a cop-out. I have higher standards for my own portfolio.
What has Trump done except to launch a NFT & get arrested?
With a
retardedstupid statement like this, it's difficult to come to any conclusion except that you aren't a serious person.He's not, he's being a shill because he's a NeoLiberal infiltrator (in my opinion). He rants about black people to try and boost his cred among the ConPro types, and then pushes NeoLiberalist policies. This is what makes me concerned about supporting DeSantis. I feel like there's a strong online push for him, only from bad actors.
He did operation warp speed for the clot shot. Didn't fire fauci. Got bump stocks banned.
Didn't clean house at the fbi.
Got Barr as AG (who supported the fbi team legally for the ruby ridge events, and still believes they were right).
He's done a lot of really awful things.
Started the process to draft women in 2019, before being backstabbed by establishment GOP in 2020 and 2021 attempts to pass it.
Took on women's cult and defeated it to remove campus rape courts.
Created a strong economy by removing red tape that held back the industrial machine.
Pulled the United States out of the Paris Accords.
What did DeSimptis do other than shill women's not so secret plan to bring back the old Title IX with the illegal campus rape courts?
If Trump made Haley his VP would you still vote for him?
I'd rather not think about that. Kari Lake is another one I'd not want to see.
Okay, so if Trump picks lake as his VP and desantis has a guy, who are you going to pick?
A hasty retreat to somewhere like Switzerland.
That's just choosing between a compromised former ally and Boris Johnson 2.0. Neither is a good pick.
If the base wants to guarantee that we lose 2024, they nominate Trump again.
If the base wants a chance of unseating Joe Biden they will nominate DeSantis.
Winning 2024 is what truly matters, Trump has ZERO shot of winning AZ, GA and WI in the general election. Without those states there is no electoral college victory.
Electability is the key metric and it is clear that DeSantis is better in it.
If you are someone who wants to ignore electability, then we can look at other metrics like overall competence, personnel selection skills and results achieved from both DeSantis and Trump, it is clear that DeSantis is still superior.
They don't understand that America First dies if we lose the 2024 general election.
If Trump is the nominee in 2024 he will lose and by the 2028 primaries, MAGA as a movement will be essentially dead.
I have my gripes with the MAGA movement but not with the actual policies, I think the policies are great.
It is sad that the MAGA movement has completely turned into a personality cult around Trump focusing on one man instead of saving the country.
Smooth talking toxic grifters like Kari Lake will run MAGA into the ground.
If DeSantis wins 2024, MAGA's desired policies will persist. Only Trumpers don't understand what happens if Trump is the 2024 nominee. He will lose the general.
If Trump is the nominee and loses 2024, it is very likely that the 2028 ticket will end up being a Youngkin-Kemp ticket and we will win 2028 but we won't get anything resembling MAGA policies.
Doesn't cover up their execution fanaticism and destruction of free speech.