Because there's a chance they can re-offend. I'm all for sending back illegals and criminals if they were not born in that country but pedos, no, I ain't risking some child on that.
Ok you got a source on that as I know China allows degeneracy to run rampant on TikTok but on a similar app that's China only they shut that shit down HARD.
That seems less of a China issue more 'if you don't enforce rules competently and all favoritism, you allow the degenerate filth to flourish' as Reddit, Facebook and pre Elon had a horrific pedo problem. I don't care to defend China but when the CIA let's pedos work for them and get away with crimes under 'security concerns to prosecute' it seems to be an internal issue..
China is intentionally pushing LGBTQ through algorithms on US tik tok, this isn’t even arguable and it’s why LibsofTikTok even became a thing. They have constantly pushed for subversion in the US to try and establish global dominance. Why would we not ship the byproducts they created to them?
150 million tik tok users in the US, how many predditors owned by tencent, on and on… China has run a full subversion campaign on western values while democrats clapped gleefully for the mentally deranged votes coming their way.
Tumblr had no where near the presence that TikTok does, it would be like equating our sub to r/politics. Probably with an equal distribution of bots and subversives as well. Tik tok projected Tumblr stupidity to every person who thought they were joining vine 2.0
Bit what if they drift back or even worse, like what happened with crocodiles in Africa thanks to all the bodies caused by 'changes in management', sharks eat them, get enormous and we accidentally make a megaldon
You know, maybe there is a good point being made in all of this. We could potentially solve two problems at once by introducing fentanyl in classrooms. They can only learn good practices from exposure, right? They could feasibly learn what it looks like, what it feels like, or perhaps what it smells like. It could lower overdose rates just like that! And it will allow future junkies to live authentically. That's what we all want, right?
Once again, sexuality is a slang term. Sexual intercourse and reproduction have very definitive conditions that must be met. You cannot have sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex. It’s the same reason humans are sexually dimorphic which no scientist tries to argue, only “social science” does.
It’s a biological argument. Sexual intercourse has a very specific set definition. Same as sexual reproduction. The bastardized verbiage of sex has lead to nonsensical terminology like sexual orientation, anal sex, oral sex, etc all of which are completely nonsensical when you use sex in its scientific purpose which is for intercourse/ copulation and reproduction. “Gay sex” is more akin to masturbation using other people than anything even remotely close to sexual reproduction.
'Definition' is fairly arbitrary. The best defense of your point of view is the Aristotelean argument that anything that does not satisfy the final cause (goal) of sex, which is reproduction, cannot be classified as sex.
Not necessarily, as sex itself is a dead term (Roman) which is why it’s used for biology. The conflation of sex as social slang for academic purposes shows how subverted “social sciences” are as they can’t even acknowledge the reason we use dead languages without their entire structure of definitions collapsing.
I vaguely remember in my biology classes that distinction sometimes being made among non-human animals. Sexual stimulation that wasn't procreative was termed something like "sexual play", which also would have included acts performed by animals not yet of reproductive age.
I can imagine technical reasons why biologists would want to distinguish between the two.
It's not like he actually believes being a two-pump chump is the only way to have sex. He's just chasing the hot take make number go up effect that all social media addicts chase, and you can't get away from, even here.
I don’t know what’s sadder, thinking social slang on dead languages is a good thing when it’s intentional conflation to shift the Overton window, or being so pathetically stupid you think it’s just a “word game”. What do you prefer?
You're gonna need a second decently-sized spergeout to prove that one, and while you're at it, a third to come up with a loophole for why it's still sex if you last longer than 10 seconds.
It’s more so about using the Socratic method to make arguments more succinct, which AoV usually enjoys doing through devil advocacy and alternative explanations. Nothing wrong with it as it generally leads to a better structured understanding/ argument overall even if he gets sophistic at times.
I want to ask "seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?" to them, but I know. We all know. This is why they suffer horribly in prisons, deservedly so.
And I really want to execute all active pedophiles but institutions are protecting them and the law systems in a lot of countries are a joke.
Execute? Just ship them off to china
Because there's a chance they can re-offend. I'm all for sending back illegals and criminals if they were not born in that country but pedos, no, I ain't risking some child on that.
China subverts and promotes pedophiles intentionally in the US
Ok you got a source on that as I know China allows degeneracy to run rampant on TikTok but on a similar app that's China only they shut that shit down HARD.
That seems less of a China issue more 'if you don't enforce rules competently and all favoritism, you allow the degenerate filth to flourish' as Reddit, Facebook and pre Elon had a horrific pedo problem. I don't care to defend China but when the CIA let's pedos work for them and get away with crimes under 'security concerns to prosecute' it seems to be an internal issue..
China is intentionally pushing LGBTQ through algorithms on US tik tok, this isn’t even arguable and it’s why LibsofTikTok even became a thing. They have constantly pushed for subversion in the US to try and establish global dominance. Why would we not ship the byproducts they created to them?
Less so than the groomers.
150 million tik tok users in the US, how many predditors owned by tencent, on and on… China has run a full subversion campaign on western values while democrats clapped gleefully for the mentally deranged votes coming their way.
Tumblr had no where near the presence that TikTok does, it would be like equating our sub to r/politics. Probably with an equal distribution of bots and subversives as well. Tik tok projected Tumblr stupidity to every person who thought they were joining vine 2.0
Frankly this is too generous. A charitable course of action would be to dump them in international waters.
Bit what if they drift back or even worse, like what happened with crocodiles in Africa thanks to all the bodies caused by 'changes in management', sharks eat them, get enormous and we accidentally make a megaldon
All I'm hearing is giant sharks to eat foreign boats, keeping more foreigners out.
You know, maybe there is a good point being made in all of this. We could potentially solve two problems at once by introducing fentanyl in classrooms. They can only learn good practices from exposure, right? They could feasibly learn what it looks like, what it feels like, or perhaps what it smells like. It could lower overdose rates just like that! And it will allow future junkies to live authentically. That's what we all want, right?
Gay people can’t physically have sex. Prove me wrong
Even under any technical conditions they would be bisexual if they engaged in sexual intercourse
Once again, sexuality is a slang term. Sexual intercourse and reproduction have very definitive conditions that must be met. You cannot have sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex. It’s the same reason humans are sexually dimorphic which no scientist tries to argue, only “social science” does.
Find a definition of gay that doesn’t slang sex…
Just out of curiosity, are you Catholic?
Ew
Because what you said is a very Catholic point of view, though not exclusively so. It has its origins in Thomas Aquinas, and through him Aristotle.
It’s a biological argument. Sexual intercourse has a very specific set definition. Same as sexual reproduction. The bastardized verbiage of sex has lead to nonsensical terminology like sexual orientation, anal sex, oral sex, etc all of which are completely nonsensical when you use sex in its scientific purpose which is for intercourse/ copulation and reproduction. “Gay sex” is more akin to masturbation using other people than anything even remotely close to sexual reproduction.
'Definition' is fairly arbitrary. The best defense of your point of view is the Aristotelean argument that anything that does not satisfy the final cause (goal) of sex, which is reproduction, cannot be classified as sex.
Not necessarily, as sex itself is a dead term (Roman) which is why it’s used for biology. The conflation of sex as social slang for academic purposes shows how subverted “social sciences” are as they can’t even acknowledge the reason we use dead languages without their entire structure of definitions collapsing.
Definition isn't arbitrary to anyone who isn't a postmodernist.
OK, what is the objective definition of 'table'?
I vaguely remember in my biology classes that distinction sometimes being made among non-human animals. Sexual stimulation that wasn't procreative was termed something like "sexual play", which also would have included acts performed by animals not yet of reproductive age.
I can imagine technical reasons why biologists would want to distinguish between the two.
It's not like he actually believes being a two-pump chump is the only way to have sex. He's just chasing the hot take make number go up effect that all social media addicts chase, and you can't get away from, even here.
I don't know what's gayer, reaching this hard for the weakest word-game own possible, or collectively masturbating about how "clever" it is.
I don’t know what’s sadder, thinking social slang on dead languages is a good thing when it’s intentional conflation to shift the Overton window, or being so pathetically stupid you think it’s just a “word game”. What do you prefer?
You're gonna need a second decently-sized spergeout to prove that one, and while you're at it, a third to come up with a loophole for why it's still sex if you last longer than 10 seconds.
Well if you're going to counter the likes of Aristotle, you could offer a definition of sex of your own.
It’s more so about using the Socratic method to make arguments more succinct, which AoV usually enjoys doing through devil advocacy and alternative explanations. Nothing wrong with it as it generally leads to a better structured understanding/ argument overall even if he gets sophistic at times.
I'm not saying he's wrong. Just explaining why this is a Catholic belief.
Also why they opose birth control, because it negates the final cause of sex.
You're not my type.
Are you going to claim I’m a closeted homo next for daring to hold things to the standards they are scientifically defined by next?
I want to ask "seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?" to them, but I know. We all know. This is why they suffer horribly in prisons, deservedly so.
i really want them to talk to these pikes about their insides.