Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

29
Bungie wins $4.3 million decision after suing aimbot developer in California - then brings new $6.7 million suit against another cheat developer (torrentfreak.com)
posted 3 years ago by Graphenium 3 years ago by Graphenium +29 / -0
44 comments share
44 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (44)
sorted by:
▲ 30 ▼
– deleted 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– Ahaus667 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

The DMCA should have just been called the Disney copyright in perpetuity act

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

The DMCA is fuckin garbage. Bungie can't win a technical battle with hax devs so they resort to court instead. Totally lame. Totally jewish.

The one point I think they should have a case against Mr May: He was banned from their servers and continued using them. That is the equivalent of hacking someone even if he changed his digital identity.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– evilmathmagician2 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Trying to make what was a single player game into an always-online multiplayer game, then making it into a totally serious competitive multiplayer game was not embarassing enough for Bungie.

I don't like dealing with cheaters in multiplayer games, but fuck everyone involved here, really. Esports has been awful for vidya and every company pursuing it deserves suffering. And especially fuck Bungie for rotting away and being unable to handle making good games anymore.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– FutaCumDiet 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Imagine being the kind of fuckboi that uses aimbot on fucking Destiny 2.

Imagine being the kind of fuckboi that sets up an LLC in the US with your real names.

Highly doubt Bungie is going to see a fraction of that money considering these kind of court cases are about setting presidents and sending messages.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SomeRando 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I am pulled betwixt two worlds - I hate encountering aimbot in Halo CE enough to laugh at the misfortune of its devs, but I also don't like Bungie/343 enough to cheer them on as they line their pockets with lawsuits.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

New suit - https://wccftech.com/destiny-2-cheat-seller-lavicheats-is-hit-by-6-7m-lawsuit-from-bungie/

They’ve even sued individual players for “harassment” :

https://torrentfreak.com/that-rude-kid-sued-by-bungie-for-cheating-in-destiny-2-is-fighting-back-220921/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ahaus667 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

In a recent Twitter post, L.L. revealed that he’s just 17 years old but that doesn’t appear to affected Bungie’s position on the lawsuit.

Hopefully this is a wake up call to not be a toxic pos, though it’s more than likely going to embolden him because of the “I’m just a minor” defense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

He doesn’t appear to have committed any crimes - using cheats/breaking unenforceable EULAs is entirely legal - and “toxic” is the language of mental rot.

Do you think a kid should have their life ruined for making a joke about a video game studio burning down?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Ahaus667 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Using cheats is what the pathetic and cowardly do, toxic aptly describes the little cunt as he wants to win at any cost and flaunt it. I hold no sympathy for cheaters in any format, “legal” or otherwise.

Do you think a kid should have their life ruined for making a joke about a video game studio burning down?

He’s 17, a kid by every definition is prepubescent. He’s old enough to join the military and should be held to that level of responsibility, not coddled like a pathetic little child.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Fuck cheaters - that being said:

So people should be unfairly dragged through legal proceedings because of (the supremely undefinable) “toxic behavior”?

Some sort of “scared straight” program for internet meanies? Golly, I sure hope you’ve never publicly opposed anything which might get you labeled “toxic”. Never said a slur or verbalized a “wrongthink” in range of an electronic device.

How old should a child be before they can undergo hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Ahaus667 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

So people should be unfairly dragged through legal proceedings because of (the supremely undefinable) “toxic behavior”?

He’s being dragged through legal proceedings for fraud, violating terms of service, profiting off fraud and perceived threats. No where is toxic behavior listed as the damages done that is a descriptor not a metric, why are you intentionally conflating the two?

How old should a child be before they can undergo hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery?

Once again child mean’s prepubescent, why are you intentionally conflating a 17 year old with a child?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

>He’s being dragged through legal proceedings for fraud [buying the game again after being banned]

Not a crime

>violating terms of service [cheating],

Not a crime

>profiting off fraud [streaming his use of cheats and new accounts]

Not a crime

>and perceived threats [joking, on twitter, about the Bungie offices burning down]

Not a crime

> why are you intentionally conflating a 17 year old with a child?

I didn’t, I asked how old you think someone needs to be to make life altering decisions, and that was actually a double whammy, I also wanted to get you to realize how worthless a classification “toxic” is in regards to behavior, because no matter what your answer was (adeptly dodged, are you training for a political role?) it will be perceived as “toxic” to many.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ahaus667 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

profiting off fraud [streaming his use of cheats and new accounts]

Not a crime

Actually he was reusing bungies trademark without permission to profit, that is textbook criminal fraud, try reading

I didn’t, I asked how old you think someone needs to be to make life altering decisions

You didn’t say someone, you said child

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– ShadistIsACuck 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

lol kill yourself

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Ahaus667 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Lol grow a pair and come do it yourself pussy

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

>doesn’t appear to have committed any torts in precedence

Cheers dude, UANAL or what?

Also, interestingly, arbitration seems to be how these judgements are being won, I wonder if it’s because of state contract law or if the accused are waving a right to trial

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You sound quite anti-semantic.

When it comes to civil suits it doesn’t matter if what he’s done is legal or illegal.

To any non-homosexual, “illegal”/“crime” implicitly includes “violations of tort and contract law precedent” aka “civil” law.

You’re doing an

>ACKSHULLY

right now

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– DemolitionsPanda 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Guy, you learn the difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law in civics class. Or perhaps "Legal Studies" In high school.

It is a distinction that has profound impact and is very much germane to the issue at hand.

You know that you are making a semantics argument, right? Then arguing for a definition that is literally wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 4 ▼
– Assassin47 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

toxic

Let them keep this one. It's not worth it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ahaus667 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

No, I don’t cede ground on verbiage just because leftists overuse and bastardize words. If others did the same we wouldn’t have the constant degradation of definitions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

There’s nothing to cede. No reasonable person has ever used “toxic” to describe human behavior. The term itself is and has always been a subversion of language, thought, and dialogue

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CatoTheElder 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Nice. It's not cutting their hands off or piking their heads like I prefer, but it's a start.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Assassin47 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I want to slap online cheaters upside the head and take their lunch money too, but this sounds a bit unhinged. It's just a game bro. If that's your punishment for teenagers using wallhax, I'd hate to see what your punishment would be for feminists, games journalists, people who rig elections, Communists, pedophiles, other assorted Hollywood degenerates, and the globalist banking cartel.

Actually maybe I'd like to see it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– CatoTheElder 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Vlad Tepes was a pretty nice guy.

Also, most hackers ARE communists, either of the FOSS variety or the chink variety.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– tappydans 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

You’re right just because there are so many Chinese people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

There are a lot of hackers in the former Soviet bloc too. I think it comes down to a few things: a) relatively high technical skill. Can't hack without this b) relatively low income. Honest work is more profitable in first-world countries. c) Low respect for international law ((())). Risk vs reward; doing this in the US is risky. A court will come fuck you like this. China DNGAF

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CatoTheElder 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Add brazil to that list, though most of those are script kiddies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Actuall hol' up

Was someone doing this inside the US? Much smarter to do that somewhere they do not care.

I actually almost look down on any country that enforces US copyright when their people are poor. Of course if you want any sort of domestic industry you have to do reciprocity. So it is not overly simple

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

This is basically an admission that Bungie can't deal with hax0rs via technical measures or even policing their own game and is hoping that some RL trolling works. If I were worried about cheaters in their game, I'd continue to be. Because they will keep going.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

It’s interesting, it seems like it’s still not technically illegal to sell cheats, which is why Bungie (and other recent examples like riot suing Valorant cheat devs) needs to roll the “cheat selling” into other, larger claims like “fraud”.

I’m with you on the legal opposition to the sellers and banning the hackers, but what do you think about how they seem to be going even further, and suing individual cheat users for “fraud” (buying their game multiple times lol), and “harassment” (making jokes about them on twitter)? That seems too far to me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CatoTheElder 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

These fucking cheaters are ontologically evil. I don't care what happens to them as long as it hurts. It's personal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Harsh, but, meh, in their existence as cheaters they do derive their enjoyment solely through ruining the enjoyment of others, so I guess fair enough

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy