He doesn’t appear to have committed any crimes - using cheats/breaking unenforceable EULAs is entirely legal - and “toxic” is the language of mental rot.
Do you think a kid should have their life ruined for making a joke about a video game studio burning down?
Using cheats is what the pathetic and cowardly do, toxic aptly describes the little cunt as he wants to win at any cost and flaunt it. I hold no sympathy for cheaters in any format, “legal” or otherwise.
Do you think a kid should have their life ruined for making a joke about a video game studio burning down?
He’s 17, a kid by every definition is prepubescent. He’s old enough to join the military and should be held to that level of responsibility, not coddled like a pathetic little child.
So people should be unfairly dragged through legal proceedings because of (the supremely undefinable) “toxic behavior”?
Some sort of “scared straight” program for internet meanies? Golly, I sure hope you’ve never publicly opposed anything which might get you labeled “toxic”. Never said a slur or verbalized a “wrongthink” in range of an electronic device.
How old should a child be before they can undergo hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery?
So people should be unfairly dragged through legal proceedings because of (the supremely undefinable) “toxic behavior”?
He’s being dragged through legal proceedings for fraud, violating terms of service, profiting off fraud and perceived threats. No where is toxic behavior listed as the damages done that is a descriptor not a metric, why are you intentionally conflating the two?
How old should a child be before they can undergo hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery?
Once again child mean’s prepubescent, why are you intentionally conflating a 17 year old with a child?
>doesn’t appear to have committed any torts in precedence
Cheers dude, UANAL or what?
Also, interestingly, arbitration seems to be how these judgements are being won, I wonder if it’s because of state contract law or if the accused are waving a right to trial
No, I don’t cede ground on verbiage just because leftists overuse and bastardize words. If others did the same we wouldn’t have the constant degradation of definitions.
There’s nothing to cede. No reasonable person has ever used “toxic” to describe human behavior. The term itself is and has always been a subversion of language, thought, and dialogue
Hopefully this is a wake up call to not be a toxic pos, though it’s more than likely going to embolden him because of the “I’m just a minor” defense.
He doesn’t appear to have committed any crimes - using cheats/breaking unenforceable EULAs is entirely legal - and “toxic” is the language of mental rot.
Do you think a kid should have their life ruined for making a joke about a video game studio burning down?
Using cheats is what the pathetic and cowardly do, toxic aptly describes the little cunt as he wants to win at any cost and flaunt it. I hold no sympathy for cheaters in any format, “legal” or otherwise.
He’s 17, a kid by every definition is prepubescent. He’s old enough to join the military and should be held to that level of responsibility, not coddled like a pathetic little child.
Fuck cheaters - that being said:
So people should be unfairly dragged through legal proceedings because of (the supremely undefinable) “toxic behavior”?
Some sort of “scared straight” program for internet meanies? Golly, I sure hope you’ve never publicly opposed anything which might get you labeled “toxic”. Never said a slur or verbalized a “wrongthink” in range of an electronic device.
How old should a child be before they can undergo hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery?
He’s being dragged through legal proceedings for fraud, violating terms of service, profiting off fraud and perceived threats. No where is toxic behavior listed as the damages done that is a descriptor not a metric, why are you intentionally conflating the two?
Once again child mean’s prepubescent, why are you intentionally conflating a 17 year old with a child?
lol kill yourself
Lol grow a pair and come do it yourself pussy
>doesn’t appear to have committed any torts in precedence
Cheers dude, UANAL or what?
Also, interestingly, arbitration seems to be how these judgements are being won, I wonder if it’s because of state contract law or if the accused are waving a right to trial
Let them keep this one. It's not worth it.
No, I don’t cede ground on verbiage just because leftists overuse and bastardize words. If others did the same we wouldn’t have the constant degradation of definitions.
There’s nothing to cede. No reasonable person has ever used “toxic” to describe human behavior. The term itself is and has always been a subversion of language, thought, and dialogue