SPLC has had to walk back multiple designations when threatened with defamation lawsuits. they even paid out millions for false designations.
calling someone "racist" is not an opinion. calling someone a nazi is not an opinion. it is an assertion of fact, and thus if false, subject to defamation laws. threaten to sue them for their false and defamatory statements, and they walk it back every time.
Strongly disagree. Calling a lawyer because someone libels you is a great thing. It's about time that people faced consequences for falsely accusing others of being Nazis.
Libel in the US: you wrote something that is demonstrably false. You can say anything you want as long as it's clear that it's your opinion and not being presented as fact.
In order to refute the slander you must explain how false political accusations work. This is not "trapping yourself in leftist framing and dialectic." It is the explication of how the framing and dialectic function.
Letting such false accusations stand is capitulation.
Even America doesn't allow libel and slander because it's not free speech. Either you can allow the courts to deal with it or we can go back to dueling
Leftists call people "Nazis" because it gives them carte blanche to attack them. Forcing them to recant before their target designation pays off is an appropriate response.
This is how you deal with people who call you a Nazi.
i prefer "thanks for noticing".
SPLC has had to walk back multiple designations when threatened with defamation lawsuits. they even paid out millions for false designations.
calling someone "racist" is not an opinion. calling someone a nazi is not an opinion. it is an assertion of fact, and thus if false, subject to defamation laws. threaten to sue them for their false and defamatory statements, and they walk it back every time.
the adl is actually defamation league
Strongly disagree. Calling a lawyer because someone libels you is a great thing. It's about time that people faced consequences for falsely accusing others of being Nazis.
-J.K. Rowling
Was the troon actually committing libel though? I know Britain is a socialist hellscape, but are they actually that cucked?
> Oi M8! YOU GOT A LOISCENCE FOR THAT COMPARISON?!?
Libel in the US: you wrote something that is demonstrably false. You can say anything you want as long as it's clear that it's your opinion and not being presented as fact.
Libel in the UK: you wrote something mean.
Anything that hurts those parasites is good
Does it count as libel when queers on the internet call you a stormcuck for thinking we shouldn’t send Israel more MISSILES?
If it does you better watch out
"Of course you should fight fire with fire. You should fight everything with fire."
Rowling is a leftist
No... I'd say using libel laws is fighting fire with water.
Because they like to say 'you have freedom of speech but not freedom from consequences'? Now that is fighting fire with fire.
In order to refute the slander you must explain how false political accusations work. This is not "trapping yourself in leftist framing and dialectic." It is the explication of how the framing and dialectic function.
Letting such false accusations stand is capitulation.
or their honor, if they declined, and society enforced that decision.
Our present society does not.
Literally libel and also accusing her of something that is a crime in several european nations.
That’s not an option. So then what?
Well they aren't going away. So you can sit there and let them only be used for evil, or you can at least attempt to leverage them for a better cause.
Even America doesn't allow libel and slander because it's not free speech. Either you can allow the courts to deal with it or we can go back to dueling
Leftists call people "Nazis" because it gives them carte blanche to attack them. Forcing them to recant before their target designation pays off is an appropriate response.
It's extremely good to punish these kinds of people no matter how you do it.
They made this bed; let them burn in it.