From an article on a dissenter within the genital mutilation mill...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Christ man.
Goddamn imp you really need to go touch grass. Women are not a hivemind. No group is. You talk about collective groups in as black and white a manner as nazis.
Seriously, are you doing a parody bit, or are you mentally unwell?
Imp is so far off the deep end that she apparently wants humans to go extinct. It's the only logical outcome her stated goals could hope to achieve.
Society is demonstrably gynocentric. Women and the happiness and comfort of women is a major motivating factor in the way that society is arranged. In the past women were a protected class. Today women have all the rights of men and special treatment in many, many circumstances.
Feminism states that:
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Sentiments
It goes on to call "Tyranny" the financial support of women by their fathers and then their husbands; seeking to bring about and end to both the nuclear family and traditional marriage.
Feminism is the DOMINANT political paradigm in the west.
So not only is society arranged mostly for the benefit of women; at the same time women have convinced the world that they are the victims of total subjugation and have worked for nearly 130 years to destroy the very foundations of that society; with much success.
ALL women benefit from this. None I have seen are keen to hand back any of the power or benefits that the political movement has granted them.
So Imp is insane for noticing?
Imp goes well beyond "noticing" feminism is cancerous. Nobody here actually argues that it isn't. He actively argues that literally all women are evil.
He takes the retarded ideological failings of the people who most often say they're "just NOTICING" when they ritually, religiously ignore any group doing anything bad if it's outside of fhe groups they "notice" to an extreme. He's like a parody of the wehraboos.
People of every race and sex can be leftist retards. People of every race and sex can be intelligent human beings that are beneficial to the world around them. Some demographics are statistically worse than others, but that is not the point I argue against.
More-so insane for being so tunnel-vision obsessed that no matter the topic he'll find some way to relate it back to the evils of women/feminism. Maybe not strictly "insane", but it certainly promotes a fairly limited insight and perspective.
Or perhaps he is noticing that every facet of society, every minute of our life is influenced by the dominant social paradigm and the 50 % of the population (men and women) who advance that cause.
Imp is over the top, but is he wrong? We are in the process of literally sacrificing the most successful countries on earth to appease the female need for special treatment.
Pair Bonding has been going on between men and women for literally a million years. It is now untenable today in most English speaking countries.
Is he really overreacting? How hurt and angry should he be?
I don't think he's wrong persay. Just that he's getting so focused and obsessed that he's bound either ignore or miss other issues at play that have almost nothing to do with feminism or the cultural-power dynamics between men and women.
Is he overreacting? Maybe a little bit. Not because the issues he's pressing on aren't paramount or impactful but because they're the sole lens through which he seems to look at or respond to on any issue.
Should he be angry? Hell yes, as should many other men. But should he, or other men, freely let their emotions override all sense of logic and reasoning? Not if a man wants to keep any of his sanity and accomplish something in his life.
The odds may be stacked, but just focusing on how they're stacked and bitching about it non-stop without actually DOING anything useful to address the problem, accomplish something, and/or supporting your fellow man is just going to waste what little time there is in one's life and sap it of all meaning and value.
Imp is clearly MGTOW. He seems to be building his financial position and advancing career.
I think he realizes it takes a consistent effort to overcome the base nature of men and to treat women as the social equivalent of toxic waste.
I mean, if you don't want to have sex with women, and you have no interest in a relationship, why would you even bother to throw rocks at them? The chances of a positive outcome from any interaction is basically zero; and women have both the motivation and the power to ruin a man's life forever.
Sure he is bombastic, but so what? It is infinitely preferable to one more fucking simp or apologist.
Feminism is cancerous, yes. But the shit you spout goes far beyond recognizing ideological enemies and into collectivism based on immutable traits that people are born into, which is illogical.
This sort of argument against TheImp is tiresome, because it results in him moving the goal post and going on a different tangent.
But now, he made a strategic error.
You brilliantly challenged him with "Women are not a hivemind."
He took the bait that you so astutely laid out for him and countered with tangible numbers showing women do behave like a hive when it comes to political leaning.
This is your opportunity to crush him and prove him wrong with ironclad factual falsifiable data.
Stick to your original argument, don't let him distract you.
Go!
I don't need to do anything else to prove that post wrong, he just footshot himself. Dude talks about women like they are literally all an interconnected slime monster and then posts "61%". Which proves my point entirely.
Because leftism is wrong. Recognizing the individual as distinct from the group is logically and morally correct. Collectivism is a simple ideological tool for authoritarians. Collectivists are typically moronic shock troops used for sociopaths to gain power.
See the rise of communism or nearly any other authoritarian ideology. Judge people based on their actions and choices, that is fine. Profiling based on demographic can be a useful tool. But pure collectivist behavior is for brainlet tools. And I mean tool in the literal sense - people that fall for that shit are puppets.
Well put. A lot of politics these days consists of being shitty and then saying it’s okay because the other side was shitty in an equivalent way, while nevertheless reserving the right to call out the same behavior as bad the next time the other side does it. People can wax tough about realpolitik all they want, but I’m not playing the game if it’s two different bad guys opposing each other. One side has to do things the right way, even if it might be more useful or convenient to do things the wrong way to score a point or make a gain.
And I’m with you, ultimately, the right way is treating people as individuals, both for plaudits and accountability, and never expecting, insisting, or requiring everyone to “represent” whatever group someone else thinks they belong to.
I assume that as an individualist you have major objections to Zionism.
How is playing it like this in any way productive, effective, or efficient? All it does is make you and everyone around you look like a damn fool. You could try and fine-tune your focus so it's not such a senseless mess.
If that stat was 91%, you might have some rebuttal there to "women are not a hivemind", but the best you had to offer was a 10% swing past 50-50.
That's what you got mad about?
Life finds a way
It is going to be amazing to watch how the NPC left twists the obvious harm that was done in the name of their cause when the narrative finally collapses. The sooner it happens the less victims there will be, until then though...
There's no guarantee this narrative will collapse in our lifetime.
Most likely we will not watch the NPC left twist the obvious harm they've done.
I know it's comforting to think that good will prevail, and that anytime now the bad guys are going to lose, but that happens more often in movies than in real life.
Even the Soviet Union collapsed eventually, but I agree that it could take far too long for it to happen. They definitely don't appear to be putting much effort into stopping it now though, but whether there's no telling how long it will last in spite of their hubris.
"Narratives" have little to do with it. Those 100 "gender clinics" didn't spontaneously manifest. They cost money to setup. This agenda will continue until the people funding it run out of money, and no one mainstream is serious about taking it from them.
The only way they can think to garner sympathy from normies is to claim that the trans agenda is hurting black girls. The article even says that the vast majority of women being surgically mutilated by transgenderism are white, but the author knows this fact doesn’t help their cause - because leftists have successfully installed anti-whiteness as an institution in the west.
Further proof, btw, that the tranny agenda is just another tip of the spear of anti-whiteness. If this gender madness were disproportionately impacting any other racial demo, it would have been stopped decades ago.
In defense of minorities, they have become ungovernable (especially in the education system) and thus it doesn't work on them. A lesson to be learned there perhaps.
https://www.thefp.com/p/i-thought-i-was-saving-trans-kids
Holy shit, and at the same time, not surprising. My neighbor told me about a year ago her teenage daughter is now non-binary and I advised her to see if that sort of thing was trending in her school. I don’t think she appreciated the suggestion, but I had to, in good conscience, at least try to point mom in the direction of what was really happening. I’d just read a story about how 9 of 10 “non-binary” girls in one school decided to be female again after they’d been learning from home during the pandemic (and not seeing each other every day, etc.)