From an article on a dissenter within the genital mutilation mill...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Goddamn imp you really need to go touch grass. Women are not a hivemind. No group is. You talk about collective groups in as black and white a manner as nazis.
Seriously, are you doing a parody bit, or are you mentally unwell?
Imp is so far off the deep end that she apparently wants humans to go extinct. It's the only logical outcome her stated goals could hope to achieve.
Society is demonstrably gynocentric. Women and the happiness and comfort of women is a major motivating factor in the way that society is arranged. In the past women were a protected class. Today women have all the rights of men and special treatment in many, many circumstances.
Feminism states that:
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Sentiments
It goes on to call "Tyranny" the financial support of women by their fathers and then their husbands; seeking to bring about and end to both the nuclear family and traditional marriage.
Feminism is the DOMINANT political paradigm in the west.
So not only is society arranged mostly for the benefit of women; at the same time women have convinced the world that they are the victims of total subjugation and have worked for nearly 130 years to destroy the very foundations of that society; with much success.
ALL women benefit from this. None I have seen are keen to hand back any of the power or benefits that the political movement has granted them.
So Imp is insane for noticing?
Imp goes well beyond "noticing" feminism is cancerous. Nobody here actually argues that it isn't. He actively argues that literally all women are evil.
He takes the retarded ideological failings of the people who most often say they're "just NOTICING" when they ritually, religiously ignore any group doing anything bad if it's outside of fhe groups they "notice" to an extreme. He's like a parody of the wehraboos.
People of every race and sex can be leftist retards. People of every race and sex can be intelligent human beings that are beneficial to the world around them. Some demographics are statistically worse than others, but that is not the point I argue against.
More-so insane for being so tunnel-vision obsessed that no matter the topic he'll find some way to relate it back to the evils of women/feminism. Maybe not strictly "insane", but it certainly promotes a fairly limited insight and perspective.
Or perhaps he is noticing that every facet of society, every minute of our life is influenced by the dominant social paradigm and the 50 % of the population (men and women) who advance that cause.
Imp is over the top, but is he wrong? We are in the process of literally sacrificing the most successful countries on earth to appease the female need for special treatment.
Pair Bonding has been going on between men and women for literally a million years. It is now untenable today in most English speaking countries.
Is he really overreacting? How hurt and angry should he be?
I don't think he's wrong persay. Just that he's getting so focused and obsessed that he's bound either ignore or miss other issues at play that have almost nothing to do with feminism or the cultural-power dynamics between men and women.
Is he overreacting? Maybe a little bit. Not because the issues he's pressing on aren't paramount or impactful but because they're the sole lens through which he seems to look at or respond to on any issue.
Should he be angry? Hell yes, as should many other men. But should he, or other men, freely let their emotions override all sense of logic and reasoning? Not if a man wants to keep any of his sanity and accomplish something in his life.
The odds may be stacked, but just focusing on how they're stacked and bitching about it non-stop without actually DOING anything useful to address the problem, accomplish something, and/or supporting your fellow man is just going to waste what little time there is in one's life and sap it of all meaning and value.
Feminism is cancerous, yes. But the shit you spout goes far beyond recognizing ideological enemies and into collectivism based on immutable traits that people are born into, which is illogical.
This sort of argument against TheImp is tiresome, because it results in him moving the goal post and going on a different tangent.
But now, he made a strategic error.
You brilliantly challenged him with "Women are not a hivemind."
He took the bait that you so astutely laid out for him and countered with tangible numbers showing women do behave like a hive when it comes to political leaning.
This is your opportunity to crush him and prove him wrong with ironclad factual falsifiable data.
Stick to your original argument, don't let him distract you.
Go!
I don't need to do anything else to prove that post wrong, he just footshot himself. Dude talks about women like they are literally all an interconnected slime monster and then posts "61%". Which proves my point entirely.
Because leftism is wrong. Recognizing the individual as distinct from the group is logically and morally correct. Collectivism is a simple ideological tool for authoritarians. Collectivists are typically moronic shock troops used for sociopaths to gain power.
See the rise of communism or nearly any other authoritarian ideology. Judge people based on their actions and choices, that is fine. Profiling based on demographic can be a useful tool. But pure collectivist behavior is for brainlet tools. And I mean tool in the literal sense - people that fall for that shit are puppets.
How is playing it like this in any way productive, effective, or efficient? All it does is make you and everyone around you look like a damn fool. You could try and fine-tune your focus so it's not such a senseless mess.
If that stat was 91%, you might have some rebuttal there to "women are not a hivemind", but the best you had to offer was a 10% swing past 50-50.