Lefty friends posting this and are angry
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
I think it would be funny to go to a fairly legit and known college, sign up for an English composition online class, do 100% of the coursework with an AI, and then post something like a blog about it after the fact. I bet it would actually go rather well.
Most of the garbage I wrote in college papers just to fill the word count sounds like it was written by an AI.
I remember when I was in my second college composition class, I would write almost everything at midnight the night before it was due. I averaged enough of those to make an A in the course up to that point. There was a final paper that was longer and worth a large chunk of the grade. I decided to actually take it seriously and put work into it. I got a C on it. Pissed me off I did better half asleep than trying.
This is why I fear our AI overlords. Most papers look right when half-assed.
That's what they get when a quota is demanded. Word counts and page limitations demand quantity over quality. It's saddly rather appropriately preparing you for how the world really operates.
I used to get in big trouble for going well over the word count and being forced to "prune down" until it lost so much cohesion and context it sounded like AI.
And said post is also written by an AI ;)
Tracing has always been a thing. There's a few infamous "artists" in the industry today who still go to cons despite being known for tracing.
Cartoonists use style art guides and often just place the face onto the animation if needed.
The Tim Buckley school of B^U
Beeupyou? There's a name I haven't heard in a looong time.
I miss Youtube annotations. Made for some great comedy.
That explains all the family guy rip off cartoons on YouTube made by crazy people.
What style art guides?
Comic artist Greg Land traces porn. Really.
It's funny that people are getting booty blasted over this but no way is it real.
A kid wrote this.
No, an AI wrote this.
*X-Files theme plays*
It does read like something my 13 year old cousin would spit out if I told him to write an essay on how AI art has changed his life.
Or a jealous artist. They are the type to manufacture hoaxes
Specifically on calling bullshit, chatGPT does not run locally, and is dreadful for anything more than a few paragraphs anyways.
StableDiffusion runs locally
Yes, and as I said chatGPT does not run locally, and it is not StableDiffusion.
From what I’ve seen you can barely get a foot drawn without the toes degrading in to weird whisps of fleshy smoke. I can’t imagine thinking we’re not 5 years away from generating art in a consistent style.
I am pro AI art and I love every minute of it.
I know, right? It's a useful thing and hilarious to read about.
They should all just learn to code imo.
I mean, they can just learn traditional art... like how to paint with actual paints. I am an artist and I am shielded from this because I create traditional art rather than pixels.
Still not worried because my career is in firearm customization and my preferred art form is leather working.
Meh, more ligit than the current money laundering operation known as 'modern art'
And, from an artistic perspective, all the people who were "artists" who have been doing nothing but modern art type trash for years or pretending modern art wasn't utter trash get what they deserve with the AI art destroying them.
True
I'm not really a Shadversity fan, but he did a video about getting StableDiffusion to draw swords in which he illustrated that feeding it a drawing of his, then asking the AI to replicate it. He got great results feeding it some starting material and tweaking the parameters until he had what he wanted (a comic/graphic novel style).
To be fair, I HATE the idea of "AI Artists" making money off their shit. I do believe that anything is fair game until financial profit is involved. And I say this as someone that uses Diffusion.
That said, I would consider the use of AI to produce cover art for a novel, but I'd have to actually write a novel first.
I don't care if an AI artist makes money off of making their AI art personally. Now as a buyer I sure wouldn't pay as much as say someone who painstakingly painted every drop of paint on the canvas vs a paintng that a guy maybe spent a few hours getting the exact settings right to have the AI generate it lol.
Heck though, sometimes that AI stuff makes an actual better quality product than someone by hand. If so and someone wants to buy it what do I care lol.
Besides, these artists wanted art taking seriously they shoulnd't have been pretending "modern art" was ever good anyway and actually developed real skills. They did this to themselves lol.
The technology just came out so it'll take a while for the market to correct. The value of digital art will reduce. It's all good.
I've been noticing ai art getting used more and more by youtubers as filler visual content. At first it was a novel idea, but the more I see it the less I like it. Like a sort of primal aversion I myself don't really understand. For lack of a better word, I kind if cringe now when they pop up. Maybe they come off lazy? Or maybe I dislike how they aren't crediting the ai software? Dunno... bit I am disliking it more each passing day and I do not fully understand why.
I was thinking you could make some creative thumbnails with it.