If you don't like the way that country lives, don't live in that country. Novel concept for imperialist leftits, but, colonialism is dead. Get with the times, faggots.
It's just their DIE agenda biting them in the ass. There were plenty of candidates that would have stayed but they fucked them over in favor of the fag. No sympathy.
This even assumes that it's true. Why would they just leave japan because they can't get a gay marriage recognized by the state. This isn't an anti-sodomy law or something. They can literally just get married, come back, and live together.
I don't even have an objection to same sex marriage, but I'm not seeing the validity of these claims.
No, it makes no sense to say it limits international talent. Japan can't really stop you from bringing your lover with you to Japan, and wasn't going to do it anyway.
No, not recognizing gay marriage isn't going to prevent gay senior executives (all eleven of them, or whatever) from staying in the country.
I've kind of gone more nuanced on it after I heard a lot of arguments from people not just shouting at me (which 99% of the time is leftists)
I got no problem with legal 'marriage' like a civil partnership, it'd be good if they adopted the same relationship roles as straight couples as we see how destructive it is when straight women abandon marriage
But there's two issues, one is that the 'gay community' that fought for it aren't accepting it themselves and are still engaging in the degenerate ways of old
The second issue is how it's used as a wedge to push toxic left ideology like trans, diversity, inclusion etc. Unless the 'gay community' ends and gay is no longer an identity but an aspect of it, you cannot allow samesex marriage, sorry for the long explanation.
I got no problem with legal 'marriage' like a civil partnership, it'd be good if they adopted the same relationship roles as straight couples as we see how destructive it is when straight women abandon marriage
It's actually something that scientists have started studying, and the benefits of a gay marriage on a monogamous gay couple are astronomical. Mostly, because they are both men, who are both pursuing careers, both pursuing status, both accumulating wealth, and you cut their expenses in half, and allowed them to be satisfied romantically. Their social mobility skyrockets. It's probably one of the fastest way out of poverty.
We don't see that reflected in Lesbian marriages at all. There's very little benefit for to women getting together. Basically, neither of them gain a lot from the marriage, because neither of them want to work full time, or pursue careers full time. Domestic violence rates end up being through the roof. Their social mobility basically stops, and their lives aren't improved all that much.
Mother of God, are you telling me that all that is stopping the 'incels' (hate that term) from ruling the earth is artificial wombs and a discussion on which ones the bottom and has to wear the dress? /s
You're right about them not really getting married. Not that my generation is doing a lot of marrying to begin with, but I haven't heard of a single gay person getting married in real life, and I'm not exactly living in Iran over here. The whole shitfit over gay marriage seems like it had no other purpose than to push boundaries.
religions should do what they want to do regards their own marriage and marriage-like systems governments should only interfere when its fucked up (child marriages)
all a government should do regards marriage is have the protections for married people that most countries already have and if they want to extend those protections to same sex couples I don't have much to complain about
the problem is when the governments force the religions to accept the gay and/or the gay just keeps being a bunch of promiscuous freaks
I had a gay co-worker once who hated the gay community and called pride inane faggotry hes probably in his 60s or 70s now so he was probably involved in a lot of the early gay rights stuff before it became the freakshow it is today
Of course that's why I made the distinction of saying 'legal marriage' only civil partnership where you aquire all the legal and financial benefits of marriage by the state but it's a distinct thing seperate from any religious practice.
But as I said and probably agree with your former co worker, if they don't accept the social roles assigned to marriage and continue the degeneracy, then we should just stop listening and give them the cold shoulder.
Unless the 'gay community' ends and gay is no longer an identity
Bingo. Gays will complain that they need it to not be left out of social activities but it's not true, and as long as a gay community exists it will always be a wedge for Pride faggotry and they will always be an "other" subculture that has to dominate or be dominated. (no not that way!!!)
If you don't like the way that country lives, don't live in that country. Novel concept for imperialist leftits, but, colonialism is dead. Get with the times, faggots.
Woke Imperialism.
Stepping back for a sec... they're bringing foreigners into Japan and then getting butthurt when the gaijin don't like it there?
It's just their DIE agenda biting them in the ass. There were plenty of candidates that would have stayed but they fucked them over in favor of the fag. No sympathy.
This even assumes that it's true. Why would they just leave japan because they can't get a gay marriage recognized by the state. This isn't an anti-sodomy law or something. They can literally just get married, come back, and live together.
Of course the faggot advocator works for Goldman sachs
I don't even have an objection to same sex marriage, but I'm not seeing the validity of these claims.
No, it makes no sense to say it limits international talent. Japan can't really stop you from bringing your lover with you to Japan, and wasn't going to do it anyway.
No, not recognizing gay marriage isn't going to prevent gay senior executives (all eleven of them, or whatever) from staying in the country.
I've kind of gone more nuanced on it after I heard a lot of arguments from people not just shouting at me (which 99% of the time is leftists)
I got no problem with legal 'marriage' like a civil partnership, it'd be good if they adopted the same relationship roles as straight couples as we see how destructive it is when straight women abandon marriage
But there's two issues, one is that the 'gay community' that fought for it aren't accepting it themselves and are still engaging in the degenerate ways of old
The second issue is how it's used as a wedge to push toxic left ideology like trans, diversity, inclusion etc. Unless the 'gay community' ends and gay is no longer an identity but an aspect of it, you cannot allow samesex marriage, sorry for the long explanation.
It's actually something that scientists have started studying, and the benefits of a gay marriage on a monogamous gay couple are astronomical. Mostly, because they are both men, who are both pursuing careers, both pursuing status, both accumulating wealth, and you cut their expenses in half, and allowed them to be satisfied romantically. Their social mobility skyrockets. It's probably one of the fastest way out of poverty.
We don't see that reflected in Lesbian marriages at all. There's very little benefit for to women getting together. Basically, neither of them gain a lot from the marriage, because neither of them want to work full time, or pursue careers full time. Domestic violence rates end up being through the roof. Their social mobility basically stops, and their lives aren't improved all that much.
Boy, those implications sure are damaging...
Mother of God, are you telling me that all that is stopping the 'incels' (hate that term) from ruling the earth is artificial wombs and a discussion on which ones the bottom and has to wear the dress? /s
In so many words? Yes.
You're right about them not really getting married. Not that my generation is doing a lot of marrying to begin with, but I haven't heard of a single gay person getting married in real life, and I'm not exactly living in Iran over here. The whole shitfit over gay marriage seems like it had no other purpose than to push boundaries.
religions should do what they want to do regards their own marriage and marriage-like systems governments should only interfere when its fucked up (child marriages)
all a government should do regards marriage is have the protections for married people that most countries already have and if they want to extend those protections to same sex couples I don't have much to complain about
the problem is when the governments force the religions to accept the gay and/or the gay just keeps being a bunch of promiscuous freaks
I had a gay co-worker once who hated the gay community and called pride inane faggotry hes probably in his 60s or 70s now so he was probably involved in a lot of the early gay rights stuff before it became the freakshow it is today
Of course that's why I made the distinction of saying 'legal marriage' only civil partnership where you aquire all the legal and financial benefits of marriage by the state but it's a distinct thing seperate from any religious practice.
But as I said and probably agree with your former co worker, if they don't accept the social roles assigned to marriage and continue the degeneracy, then we should just stop listening and give them the cold shoulder.
Bingo. Gays will complain that they need it to not be left out of social activities but it's not true, and as long as a gay community exists it will always be a wedge for Pride faggotry and they will always be an "other" subculture that has to dominate or be dominated. (no not that way!!!)