It is funny.. noblemen and kings did go into battle back then. A lot of british officers that were in the front were nobility. many were useless and pussies, but them having to maintain reputations made them at least go to the front or they are seen as cowards and made fun of by other nobles.
Require declations of war, as constitutionally required, in order to deploy at all. Our police action culture has rendered that check on executive power, irrelevant, at present.
Rolling Stone is a sort of propaganda rag masquerading as investigative journalism, now. I don't know what the angle on this one is. I don't think they're wrong. But you can figure this stuff out from better sources.
the native ameriacan solution then? put them on reservations? might not be a bad idea the place has been ravaged by warlord related problems and the local government seems impotent to fix it... they've been on basicly life support for so long and the aid is doing the opposite of what its suposed to... likely a money laundering operation of some sort i bet... but with no recipts its just hot air.
Any politician or bureaucrat who tries to send troops to another country should be required by law to go with them and actually fight.
It is funny.. noblemen and kings did go into battle back then. A lot of british officers that were in the front were nobility. many were useless and pussies, but them having to maintain reputations made them at least go to the front or they are seen as cowards and made fun of by other nobles.
It's also why World War I was the senseless goatfuck that it was.
Require declations of war, as constitutionally required, in order to deploy at all. Our police action culture has rendered that check on executive power, irrelevant, at present.
There is only one way to fight Islamists and it is called 'genocide'.
Although Islam isn't a race, so I guess we can call it deicide.
Mind you, I don't really believe in that sort of thing, so I'd have to call it memocide.
I agree, but I'd still prefer to murder a billion men women and children than cut my foreskin off.
They should just send women, I hear they can do anything that men can do but better ... in heels.
Not knocking the truthfulness of the article, but how and why is The Rolling Stone reporting on international military operations?
Rolling Stone is a sort of propaganda rag masquerading as investigative journalism, now. I don't know what the angle on this one is. I don't think they're wrong. But you can figure this stuff out from better sources.
Alternatively: Conquer the whole of Africa and evict the entirety of the native population.
the native ameriacan solution then? put them on reservations? might not be a bad idea the place has been ravaged by warlord related problems and the local government seems impotent to fix it... they've been on basicly life support for so long and the aid is doing the opposite of what its suposed to... likely a money laundering operation of some sort i bet... but with no recipts its just hot air.
I was thinking more along the lines of just dumping them in international waters.
Evict?