Does this mean as a white supremacist misogynist that non-whites and women can't testify against me because they might be willing to commit purgery against me?
Trials are supposed to be judged based on a jury of your peers. White men should not be judged by black women for example. Not should atheists be judging Christians etc... However modern degenerate egalitarian culture tries to pretend we're all peers but we aren't. The defendant has a good point, the problem is that they don't care about logical congruency.
That's if you view race as the only hierarchy that matters. What's that word leftists use.... Intersectionality. For me personally, I would only consider a white man with a similar background to me, who has a similar IQ to me, a similar career and life path, a similar community and beliefs/values as being my peer.
I just find it interesting how the guy who was "cancelled for anti-semitism" is suddenly good enough of a witness when it serves women's goals.
Or maybe, get this idea. Not literally everything is weighed on a scale of "woman gain or loss." The world does have existence outside pure gender.
Black dudes like to eat food the same as white dudes. That doesn't make discussions on fried chicken an insidious plot by the blacks to make the whites fatter through unhealthy food.
A humiliation for women's credibility that they can never recover from.
You are actually retarded. Like painfully so. This setback will mean fucking nothing to them and they will successfully do the same method of attack in the future no matter the outcome. Weinstein getting out won't absolve the infinite number of other guys destroyed by MeToo. I still have dudes who'd jump me if we ran into each other, and the accuser openly admitted the entire story was false years ago.
Even then, him getting off just lets them say "The system doesn't care about women, it exists only to protect the rich powerful men" and they are even more powerful for it. His acquittal is better for them than his conviction.
For such a paranoid doomer, you live in the most bizarrely optimistic world of winners and losers.
Nobody except their own people will believe in that
Nobody should have believed them in the first place, and yet they did so here we are. We have thousands of years of history proving no one should believe them, yet people do on instinct every day.
They are starting to run out of credibility.
No they aren't. MeToo ran its course years ago when Biden had it killed, this is just the death gasps wrapping themselves up. False Rape Accusations (or just accusations in general) will never die because women always get the benefit of the doubt by instinct. And most people are not smart enough to question their instant emotional reactions.
It would show that everything they've said is likely false if even their main case ended in defeat.
No it wouldn't. It would just lionize them with a new belief that the system is completely worthless because it doesn't cater to them, with a new cause to martyr around. Majority of people think Weinstein is guilty, so now the majority of people could easily be led to the idea of how easy it is to get away with "rape" which benefits them into getting more laws passed and movements started to their further benefit.
You can still find Amber Heard defenders easily, and they are doing the same thing. They simply are losing because Johnny Depp makes old women horny enough to not unionize with the rest.
Weinstein isn't innocent. He just probably isn't guilty of what they imply that he is.
Being an icky guy who uses power to get sex = evil, disgusting, must be shunned from society.
Being an attractive young woman using sex to get access to what she wants = simultaneously empowering and a result of women's inherent victimhood and inability to truly consent ... to anything.
Pure fucking projection.
Does this mean as a white supremacist misogynist that non-whites and women can't testify against me because they might be willing to commit purgery against me?
Purgery -> Bleaching room in a sugar refinery.
Perjury -> Lie under oath.
Still love the sentence :)
Maybe this means Chauvin (who did nothing wrong) can get out on appeal!
Trials are supposed to be judged based on a jury of your peers. White men should not be judged by black women for example. Not should atheists be judging Christians etc... However modern degenerate egalitarian culture tries to pretend we're all peers but we aren't. The defendant has a good point, the problem is that they don't care about logical congruency.
That's if you view race as the only hierarchy that matters. What's that word leftists use.... Intersectionality. For me personally, I would only consider a white man with a similar background to me, who has a similar IQ to me, a similar career and life path, a similar community and beliefs/values as being my peer.
That's fair so perhaps we just leave it at same sex, race and citizenship status.
Take this coming from an open racist. Race rhetoric says no such thing.
"he noticed things your honor, and that's why my client should be allowed to rape everything he sees with his bizarre mutated genitals."
Mel Gibson. The man who played not 1, not 2, not 3, but FOUR movies with David Glover as his co-star is a white-supremacist?
"you keep using that term.... I don't think you know what it means."
Early morning switched David for Danny.
All Mel Gibson needs to say in response to this line of questioning is "well, I was right about this one, wasn't I?"
This may surprise you, but everyone who doesn't agree with you on 100% of everything isn't part of the Feminist Mega Conspiracy.
In fact, given that Jewish women are probably the most insufferable of women I'd wager hating both is an option.
Or maybe, get this idea. Not literally everything is weighed on a scale of "woman gain or loss." The world does have existence outside pure gender.
Black dudes like to eat food the same as white dudes. That doesn't make discussions on fried chicken an insidious plot by the blacks to make the whites fatter through unhealthy food.
You are actually retarded. Like painfully so. This setback will mean fucking nothing to them and they will successfully do the same method of attack in the future no matter the outcome. Weinstein getting out won't absolve the infinite number of other guys destroyed by MeToo. I still have dudes who'd jump me if we ran into each other, and the accuser openly admitted the entire story was false years ago.
Even then, him getting off just lets them say "The system doesn't care about women, it exists only to protect the rich powerful men" and they are even more powerful for it. His acquittal is better for them than his conviction.
For such a paranoid doomer, you live in the most bizarrely optimistic world of winners and losers.
Nobody should have believed them in the first place, and yet they did so here we are. We have thousands of years of history proving no one should believe them, yet people do on instinct every day.
No they aren't. MeToo ran its course years ago when Biden had it killed, this is just the death gasps wrapping themselves up. False Rape Accusations (or just accusations in general) will never die because women always get the benefit of the doubt by instinct. And most people are not smart enough to question their instant emotional reactions.
No it wouldn't. It would just lionize them with a new belief that the system is completely worthless because it doesn't cater to them, with a new cause to martyr around. Majority of people think Weinstein is guilty, so now the majority of people could easily be led to the idea of how easy it is to get away with "rape" which benefits them into getting more laws passed and movements started to their further benefit.
You can still find Amber Heard defenders easily, and they are doing the same thing. They simply are losing because Johnny Depp makes old women horny enough to not unionize with the rest.
You just lost what little credibility you had
Weinstein isn't innocent. He just probably isn't guilty of what they imply that he is.
Being an icky guy who uses power to get sex = evil, disgusting, must be shunned from society.
Being an attractive young woman using sex to get access to what she wants = simultaneously empowering and a result of women's inherent victimhood and inability to truly consent ... to anything.