Surprise!
(media.scored.co)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
"I consider myself an LGBTQ+ ally"
When keeping it real goes wrong
That’s really sad. And society encourages it
That is not courage. He didn't make a shameful admission as the first step in seeking help, he told her he wished to embrace his self-destructive delusion.
Then everyone clapped.
Well, glad he wasted her time
the tragic comedy of this girl never being able to move away from Libtard Land, no matter what life brings her way. still an "LGBTQ+ ally", still going to a therapist, still coping by writing an article for The Guardian.
And now she can't just break it off because he'll accuse her of transphobia and have the powers that be come down upon and destroy her. And by the leftist rules that she abides by and has never questioned, he'll be right. After all, love is love, right? Gender is a social construct, right? Maybe she should also be labeled as homophobic too, since she's not going to suck the lesbian dick.
EDIT: Alright, now that I read the article, I can see plain as day she did do the wise thing and break it off with him. Granted, I can't say I feel any sympathy for her; this whole thing reads like a bitch fit. "WAAHHHHH! I'M SO TRAUMATIZED! FEEL SORRY FOR ME!" And in the end, she still can't admit that this movement is either one rife with lies and deception, or corruption, and tries to show she still supports it...even though I suspect her ex-BOYFRIEND does not feel the same way and is already plotting HIS revenge against her.
No fucktard, you were always going to be ugly. There is no fucking way you will ever look like an attractive woman no matter what age you transition at. You will always look like a freak. No exceptions. Even those who do look convincing only do so under ideal circumstances (the right lighting, the right camera angles, keeping the damning parts of the anatomy off-screen, and of course, the fact that they're wearing clothes and not showing their surgical scars or the festering wound they want you to call a vagina).
This despite the fact that he's soon going to leave her anyway, and go cruising for gay tranny cock.
[EDIT]
Just saw that the article quietly ends with 'Seven months on, I am proud of my ex'. The reason she's allowed to to get away with 'misgendering' him through the entire article ('their' is as close to 'she' as the author deigns to go) is because she ultimately acquiesces and writes about how beautiful it is that 'they' are now 'their authentic self'.
I have a feeling.
And that feeling is that this woman is (justifiably) very bitter about her boyfriend's descent into faggotry. She has every right to be - a ten year relationship that started in university? So the entirety of her 20's are gone. This man just wasted the most important decade of her life - her window of peak fertility. He leaves her close to or perhaps even over 30, single, childless, alone, the relationship they built, destroyed.
Amazingly, she even admits her rage, and the Guardian have published it;
I don't think she has made peace with with him.
I think this article is phony, and part of her revenge plot - her revenge of encouraging and supporting his self-destruction at full speed. She wants to watch every second his descent, and she intends to be praised as an ally while she does it.
Can you really blame her though
No, I can't.
This woman was planning a normal, healthy life. She was thinking that she would be having children with him in the future. Then he pushed the self-destruct button on everything, just so that he can get his rocks off to a stupid auto-erotic fetish.
She might never reproduce because of this decision of his. Approaching the end of her peak fertility window, she might fail to find a partner. She might fail to pass on her genes, because of him.
As far as her genes are concerned - as far as the ancient reptilllian core of her brain is concerned - he has just done something that has severely endangered her very existence.
No wonder she wants to watch him 42%
This is pure comedy:
Harry Styles.
No matter how many articles like this they're going to write about transsexuals, they're always going to be a punchline.
...
At this point the last paragraph becomes unreadable due to the clown grammar.
Best is to ignore everything about the clowns. They thrive on attention. This is attention-seeking behavior.
I met a girl whose husband did this to her. She was not the woke type at all, really sweet, laid back girl. It completely blindsided her. Felt really bad for her. They already had kids.
It can't be repeated often enough: Progressivism is a social and psychological disease.
Pow right in the kisser
Remarkably, the article does not refer to the boyfriend as a woman nor use female pronouns despite him declaring himself to be trans.
It is acceptable to "misgender" someone if it's an article about how he made a woman feel bad. Just like it is acceptable for news articles to hide the fact that a crime suspect is trans. I've even seen a recent article refer to a criminal as "a crossdressing man" (when I pointed it out, some trans activist replied saying "he isn't trans").
You just understandably missed it, because the clown grammar used was 'they/them', rofl.
https://nitter.net/guardian/status/1578691307794464769
You know, 10 years of dating, no marriage, no kids, no commitment, etc--why did she settle for this relationship? What is wrong with people today.
She wanted kids. She wanted to be married.
Boyfriend/whatever clearly didn't.
So now she's 30+, she's spent 1/3 of her life with someone who is clearly more into himself/ximself/xitself whatever, she's damaged goods and coming awfully close to that wall.
Why did she do that?
Something tells me there were some red flags she chose to ignore or possibly encouraged.
10 years dating is a massive red flag. Unless you're middle school sweethearts I guess.
>waiting 10 years for a proposal
ngmi
More importantly
The sexual revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race