Sex ed has never been something parents actually wanted taught in schools: it was always imposed on them by administrators.
You can watch interviews from the 80s of parents saying things like "why do they want to teach my kids about sex when they can't even teach them reading, writing, and math?"
If all sex is, as taught in schools since it was introduced, is the "scientific mechanisms" ie; this body part produces this function for this purpose, then sex can be divorced from all morality which is where we find it now.
I sort of disagree with you here. When you start from the realities of biology you tend to end up at normal sexual mores. As an example, if you only have sex with one person who you know doesn't have any STDs, you don't have to worry about STDs. I find that nowadays people are overly cautious when it comes to safe sexual behaviors or overly libertine when it comes to risky sexual behaviors. You don't need to wear a condom if you're in a monogamous relationship. You really shouldn't have sex with other men if you're a man, but we can't say that because it would hurt people's feelings.
At any rate, these people want things both ways. They want to say that their education is based in science and not morality, but they are deathly afraid of offending homosexuals, trannies, etc. I was lucky enough to more or less figure this stuff out on my own but many teenagers are not.
That “sex ed in schools” movement started in earnest during the underage sex push of the 80’s and early 90’s, which came before the homosexuality normalization push of the late 90’s and early 00’s. Before that was the sex outside of marriage and female promiscuity push of the 60’s and 70’s.
It’s all about boiling the frog slowly enough that they don’t realize what’s happening.
Almost nobody likes trannies. But if you do a "man on the street" interview, almost everyone will say they love trannies. They're afraid to tell the truth. No other reason. They're afraid of losing their jobs, being doxed, having lynch mobs show up at their homes, going to prison for hate crimes.
I'd bet that maybe 10% of people think that a man wearing a pink wig and a dress is anything but a mentally ill pervert. And that number probably drops to 1% when the issue of "trans kids" comes up. But unless a leader takes control and demonstrates that the pedophiles can be fought, nothing is going to get better. It's not worth speaking your mind if it means going to the gulag, especially since the second you're out of the picture they're going to come after your children.
There is one other scenario under which the situation improves, but I don't believe I'm allowed to talk about it.
Trannies don't even like trannies. FtM and MtF hate each other because the whole thing is one massive purity spiral and nobody wants to share the spotlight.
Why is there so much hate someone might ask? Because FtM can pass, manlets as they will be, and MtF consistently draw the ire of countless groups on a global stage.
The mecha manlets with their bike pump penises, which is probably the worst timeline 'The Six Million Dollar Man' could have created, hate the autogyns that bring a bad rap on others by association, which is also why the LGBA/LGB Alliance is a thing that wants to drop the T.
Meanwhile the Autogyns, pRedditors in disguise, hate the mecha manlets because it's far easier for a small woman to larp as a manlet than it is for a 6' 7" ogre to dress up as a princess.
Actual biological women who are too tall get funny looks despite how genuinely feminine they act and appear so a man trying to claim he's actually a chick, with a dick of course because passing isn't the intent for many autogyns now as that requires effort, will likewise draw attention and never for good reason.
The same republicans that are celebrating Blair White and "Lady" MAGA? Those republicans? The ones that are soon to be saying that the democrats are the real transphobes?
Republicans love their tokens. Because most of them still think they can wade off the bigotry accusations by parading them out.
They'd rather die than consider things like "women shouldn't even be in politics to begin with" as a policy, despite that being more "trad" than anything.
Most of them are, that’s why we need to replace as many with anti-establishments Republicans, or else winning election will be futile. Unfortunately the Libertarian Party is nowhere near capable of providing a reasonable alternative.
What if I told you what you want is impossible in a universal suffrage democracy? You don't have a majority. Oh Trump might have a majority but ever our 100 Trump supporters in a room together? Most of them might as well be Democrats in red themselves. The only solution at this stage of the decline is an authoritarian government with military to force better values on the public. Libertarian? Haha, yeah, they're no where near capable because they refuse to do what is necessary. It's game over for politics. If you want a better life through politics, you'll have a better time getting blood from a stone.
Was just watching a video Steven Crowder put out where he interviewed a gay guy that had to be anonymous during the interview. Seems the civil war between the LGB and the Ts is already there just that the Ts have institutional and media support and the LGB has to be silent about it.
My guess you made it a ballot issue, you might have usually high voter support from the gay hotspots since they can do it anonymously.
Sex ed has never been something parents actually wanted taught in schools: it was always imposed on them by administrators.
You can watch interviews from the 80s of parents saying things like "why do they want to teach my kids about sex when they can't even teach them reading, writing, and math?"
I sort of disagree with you here. When you start from the realities of biology you tend to end up at normal sexual mores. As an example, if you only have sex with one person who you know doesn't have any STDs, you don't have to worry about STDs. I find that nowadays people are overly cautious when it comes to safe sexual behaviors or overly libertine when it comes to risky sexual behaviors. You don't need to wear a condom if you're in a monogamous relationship. You really shouldn't have sex with other men if you're a man, but we can't say that because it would hurt people's feelings.
At any rate, these people want things both ways. They want to say that their education is based in science and not morality, but they are deathly afraid of offending homosexuals, trannies, etc. I was lucky enough to more or less figure this stuff out on my own but many teenagers are not.
That “sex ed in schools” movement started in earnest during the underage sex push of the 80’s and early 90’s, which came before the homosexuality normalization push of the late 90’s and early 00’s. Before that was the sex outside of marriage and female promiscuity push of the 60’s and 70’s.
It’s all about boiling the frog slowly enough that they don’t realize what’s happening.
Talking about sex is weird. Any adult who is EXCITED about talking about it with children is a sick pervert. That is all.
Any adult who demands the 'right' to talk to the children of others about sex is beyond a sick pervert.
Almost nobody likes trannies. But if you do a "man on the street" interview, almost everyone will say they love trannies. They're afraid to tell the truth. No other reason. They're afraid of losing their jobs, being doxed, having lynch mobs show up at their homes, going to prison for hate crimes.
I'd bet that maybe 10% of people think that a man wearing a pink wig and a dress is anything but a mentally ill pervert. And that number probably drops to 1% when the issue of "trans kids" comes up. But unless a leader takes control and demonstrates that the pedophiles can be fought, nothing is going to get better. It's not worth speaking your mind if it means going to the gulag, especially since the second you're out of the picture they're going to come after your children.
There is one other scenario under which the situation improves, but I don't believe I'm allowed to talk about it.
Trannies don't even like trannies. FtM and MtF hate each other because the whole thing is one massive purity spiral and nobody wants to share the spotlight.
Why is there so much hate someone might ask? Because FtM can pass, manlets as they will be, and MtF consistently draw the ire of countless groups on a global stage.
The mecha manlets with their bike pump penises, which is probably the worst timeline 'The Six Million Dollar Man' could have created, hate the autogyns that bring a bad rap on others by association, which is also why the LGBA/LGB Alliance is a thing that wants to drop the T. Meanwhile the Autogyns, pRedditors in disguise, hate the mecha manlets because it's far easier for a small woman to larp as a manlet than it is for a 6' 7" ogre to dress up as a princess.
Actual biological women who are too tall get funny looks despite how genuinely feminine they act and appear so a man trying to claim he's actually a chick, with a dick of course because passing isn't the intent for many autogyns now as that requires effort, will likewise draw attention and never for good reason.
That's a whole lot of pedos.
The same republicans that are celebrating Blair White and "Lady" MAGA? Those republicans? The ones that are soon to be saying that the democrats are the real transphobes?
I wouldn't hold my breath.
Pretty sure both of those oppose foisting this crap on children.
Republicans love their tokens. Because most of them still think they can wade off the bigotry accusations by parading them out.
They'd rather die than consider things like "women shouldn't even be in politics to begin with" as a policy, despite that being more "trad" than anything.
What if I told you the GOP is on the same side of the Democrats, that's why they're trying to avoid this issue.
Most of them are, that’s why we need to replace as many with anti-establishments Republicans, or else winning election will be futile. Unfortunately the Libertarian Party is nowhere near capable of providing a reasonable alternative.
What if I told you what you want is impossible in a universal suffrage democracy? You don't have a majority. Oh Trump might have a majority but ever our 100 Trump supporters in a room together? Most of them might as well be Democrats in red themselves. The only solution at this stage of the decline is an authoritarian government with military to force better values on the public. Libertarian? Haha, yeah, they're no where near capable because they refuse to do what is necessary. It's game over for politics. If you want a better life through politics, you'll have a better time getting blood from a stone.
Was just watching a video Steven Crowder put out where he interviewed a gay guy that had to be anonymous during the interview. Seems the civil war between the LGB and the Ts is already there just that the Ts have institutional and media support and the LGB has to be silent about it.
My guess you made it a ballot issue, you might have usually high voter support from the gay hotspots since they can do it anonymously.
No reason to talk about the mechanics of sex in schools.
With very (very) rare exceptions the GOP are just cucked DNC puppets that they allow to exist for the appearance that we have a choice.
We need a real opposition party.