Your post made me sad. Because any discussion surrounding untenable wealth gaps is immediately co-opted by commies. And the only real solution can never even be discussed because nationalism has been permanently destroyed.
When commies say eat the rich, they really mean removing that middling power base of people that aren't dependent on the regime.
It's thinking too small anyways. Rich is merely the accumulation of money. Wealth is access to goods and services. The Senior Executive Service and top ranks of the GS scale aren't necessarily rich, but they do have on demand access to any good or service available in the US.
Instead of eating the rich, I want to expropriate the wealthy. That justifies seizing the assets and dismantling everything from the CDC to Harvard to Blackrock.
Travel as well. (or maybe that's counted as a service)
That justifies seizing the assets and dismantling everything from the CDC to Harvard to Blackrock.
Naturally we have to consider any negative consequences, like a loss of trust, but I'd be fine doing that to any corporation or state institution. Those aren't people with human rights after all.
And the only real solution can never even be discussed because nationalism has been permanently destroyed.
We don't need to change the world to appease groomer feminists FFS.
The majority of teachers are women. They could easily get jobs with higher pay thanks to our fucked up job market. They choose jobs with access to children, either to groom or destroy them.
I can get behind that they're underpaid. Who are they attracting? A proper community would want teachers living in it, comfortably. What's that cost in SF?
If the number is impractical, well there's your problem.
I can say they're underpaid without implying that I want to pay them well. I don't want to pay them at all. Which is kind of how it comes down. People that want to pay enough for education that their kids get a good education go to private school. Especially in SF. The taxpayers don't really want to pay what it would cost to coddle every retard that wanders into the city. Not that throwing money at is a good solution.
I guess what I'm saying is they're underpaid for what people claim that they want the teachers to do.
Im sure living with blue haired liberals would be plenty fun. You do them a favor, and theyll screw you and say they doing you a favor by staying. Soon theyll tell you not to cook or eat meat. Theyll start to scrutinize how you parent at home. Theyll scream and cry all the time.
Ten teachers quit their jobs at a San Francisco Bay area school district when the academic year ended in June, the superintendent told school board members last month. They didn’t burn out, switch careers or decide to stay home with their families.
The teachers left because they couldn’t afford to live near their schools — so they moved to places where they could.
Their exodus led school district officials in Milpitas, Calif., to ask students’ parents for help.
Would they let a teacher move in?
So we will turn out to need the 3rd amendment again....
At least we can blame the sudden deaths that are sure to follow on the clotshot.
pretty incredible, eh? what a time to be alive!
good time to read some original source books from 1776-1900. Lodge - Hamilton is good.
Homeschooling families should be immune to levies. They should be allowed to opt out entirely.
So they can groom kids there as well as at school?
... so why the mismatch between the area's prosperity (as indicating by the fact that the house prices are stupid) and the teacher's salary?
Would it not be better to fix that than institute some weird house-your-teacher scheme?
Also, given the way teaching is these days ... yeah, giving a teacher 24-hour-a-day access to children ... no?
Your post made me sad. Because any discussion surrounding untenable wealth gaps is immediately co-opted by commies. And the only real solution can never even be discussed because nationalism has been permanently destroyed.
When commies say eat the rich, they really mean removing that middling power base of people that aren't dependent on the regime.
It's thinking too small anyways. Rich is merely the accumulation of money. Wealth is access to goods and services. The Senior Executive Service and top ranks of the GS scale aren't necessarily rich, but they do have on demand access to any good or service available in the US.
Instead of eating the rich, I want to expropriate the wealthy. That justifies seizing the assets and dismantling everything from the CDC to Harvard to Blackrock.
Travel as well. (or maybe that's counted as a service)
Naturally we have to consider any negative consequences, like a loss of trust, but I'd be fine doing that to any corporation or state institution. Those aren't people with human rights after all.
The trust is already gone. There are people dependent on those institutions for their social position, and people who despise those institutions.
Travel is actually a right
Lol who downvoted me. Travel is literally constitutional right
What is the GS scale?
US Government pay scale General Service
We don't need to change the world to appease groomer feminists FFS.
The majority of teachers are women. They could easily get jobs with higher pay thanks to our fucked up job market. They choose jobs with access to children, either to groom or destroy them.
I can get behind that they're underpaid. Who are they attracting? A proper community would want teachers living in it, comfortably. What's that cost in SF?
If the number is impractical, well there's your problem.
I can say they're underpaid without implying that I want to pay them well. I don't want to pay them at all. Which is kind of how it comes down. People that want to pay enough for education that their kids get a good education go to private school. Especially in SF. The taxpayers don't really want to pay what it would cost to coddle every retard that wanders into the city. Not that throwing money at is a good solution.
I guess what I'm saying is they're underpaid for what people claim that they want the teachers to do.
Public schooling is a commie system. It's weird that people think it's as American as apple pie.
Please house our commissariat so they will be able to report wrong-think to DCFS....
Wait, people still live in San Francisco? I thought it was a sanitation and landfill full of shit and broken computer chips.
People with so much money they don't care and people with so little money they don't care.
What could possibly go wrong with letting groomer feminist teachers live with you?
They'll rape your kids and accuse you of raping them, and the pathetic CA courts will back them up.
Im sure living with blue haired liberals would be plenty fun. You do them a favor, and theyll screw you and say they doing you a favor by staying. Soon theyll tell you not to cook or eat meat. Theyll start to scrutinize how you parent at home. Theyll scream and cry all the time.