They're coomers. You can see the straight version of this by looking at the comments section of a porn video. Frankly a gay man looking for a monogamous relationship is best off looking outside that sick culture, as tough as it may be to find someone.
I've never seen the gay version of "just be yourself and you'll find the one!"
From everything that's been relayed to me, it's very hard. As you note, promiscuity is rampant, but relationships are significantly less. Worse, straight people don't typically run into the issue of "I've already met everyone in the straight community here". Gays do. They literally run out of potential options. That's why there are also many gay men who would try to hook up with straight (-ish) men, and will even dress and act in a feminine way. One common refrain I've heard is gay men complaining that the number of gay men who are effeminate and submissive is way to high. Gay men are attracted to: ... wait for it... men (whoa!) and the masculinity that comes with it.
So how hard is it going to be to start a relationship when:
The younger men don't want to start a relationship.
The older men want younger men
They only get a chance at maybe a few dozen men in a local community before they literally have to go to a different geographic area
Most of those men not only aren't going to be "your type" normally, but also are the submissive type looking for masculine men
Promiscuity is a real problem
Communists are literally everywhere
Their chances at starting relationships are worse than even most middle-aged, eggless, carrer, women. When the eggless feminists complain "where are all the good men", they're just complaining about having to compromise, they aren't complaining that they literally ran out of men.
When the eggless feminists complain "where are all the good men", they're just complaining about having to compromise, they aren't complaining that they literally ran out of men.
This needs to pounded into the normies' skulls over and over until it sticks. My only quibble is that this applies to all women who are looking for a relationship as opposed to just getting railed by Chad since they typically don't start looking for something serious until their SMV is already in decline.
Sure, that's just the problem of living under a Feminist meta-narrative of reality. Women don't realize they've been deceived until it's way to late for them to protect their own value.
Semi-nonsequitor comment: this isn't the biggest forum, but I get so much enjoyment out of it because of intelligent, educated, well thought out comments like yours. Didn't think my simple upvote conveyed how much I appreciate comments like yours.
These men act this way because they want to be this way. It's easier to be fairies than it is to be a man. It's the same shit as women. It's easier to be frail little things who can't lift a loaf of bread so need you to get it and be the big strong man who does everything for her than to get off her privileged, baby-talking ass and do anything like work. They see femininity as this pass to an easier life and one they don't have to do anything but be feminine, so, they adopt it. It's the mindset of the lazy.
Actually, I think this needs to be a much larger discussion.
Gay men, even hundreds of years ago, have always tended towards being effeminate to attract men. Typically, because there were so few gay men, they were basically trying to attract men who were attracted to women.
What has changed is the social privileges given to gay men, metrosexual men, and effeminate men; while also disincentivizing and spurning masculinity as a society. This has caused weaker willed men to start looking for social status as women, as gay, and as effeminate.
Very long hypothesis short: It makes sense for gay men to be attracted towards masculinity, but it also makes sense for gay men to display femininity in order to attract straight men, who are attracted to femininity.
What we are seeing gays complain about is a flood of feminine gays with no masculine gays to counter. And, we are seeing feminine gays in relationships with feminine gays. I argue this is because there is a significant swath of "gays" that are actually just straight men in a confused and degenerate environment.
These gays who do effeminate behavior feel no need to embody masculine traits because it is easier for them. It is all learned behavior. While a bit of it might be to what they feel can attract a man, most of it is to fit in with the groups they want to be a part of. Of those groups, most of those traits are from women, who developed it because no one ever disabused them of their irritating damn personality traits.
There are some things gay men can and will do that straight men won't (aside from gay sex/kissing) because there are no women who call them out as 'fags' like those same women would straight men. Men's learned behavior is heavily influenced by women and the need to impress/attract them. Even gay men feel the need to impress them.
Yeah, I'm not going down the "everything is a social construct" route.
Men's learned behavior is heavily influenced by women and the need to impress/attract them. Even gay men feel the need to impress them.
No, not really. Gay men don't need to impress women. Most straight men act in response to being attracted to women and wanting their approval. That's pretty normal since they are heterosexual. There's not a social structure that needs to institutionalize them for that.
Moreover, the problem that straight men have is that they aren't socially instructed to gain the approval of women. They are so "snake-bitten" that there are tons of young men who have real drive or ambition in regards to women at all. So, in response, they don't really try to have that drive, they don't introspect very hard, they don't try to be strong & masculine, they don't try to be the provider, and they don't try to be the protector; all because they assumed women had already ejected them from the genetic lottery.
Depends on how you define marriage. I’ve yet to meet a gay couple who have consummated the marriage. Even going by the standard of monogamy eliminates 30-50%…
I’ve yet to meet a gay couple who have consummated the marriage.
... What?
Hang on a second. Am I fucking crazy?
looks up wikipedia
"In many traditions and statutes of civil or religious law, the consummation of a marriage, often called simply consummation, is the first (or first officially credited) act of sexual intercourse between two people, following their marriage to each other."
Okay, so I do know what that word means.
Why would you ever meet a gay man who didn't have sex with his husband?
"Sexual intercourse (or coitus or copulation) is a sexual activity typically involving the insertion and thrusting of the penis into the vagina for sexual pleasure, reproduction, or both."
Gay man, 22, asks a gay advice column why all the men he meets are drug popping whores whose entire existence revolves around sex, while he just wants a monogamous relationship.
Huh, sounds like this might be one of the seemingly few gay men who wasn't raped by a disgusting pedophile as a child. That might be a contributing factor here.
Sounds like one of the unfortunate souls that wants a traditional relationship but only is aroused by the same sex.
I can only give one bit of advise, DON'T use and dating service either on the Internet or some speed dating service if they still exists as the whores try use them to find "sugar daddies" to fund their binge. Ironically maybe try Church or something like it, the holy water keeps them away
I would say the same thing to straight men and women. And there are more churches that accept gays these days than there are that don't. I don't go to church often, and it was somewhat shocking for me to see clearly-gay couples at my parents' church. But it's in line with their theology.
I say this often, but I want nothing to do with ''The Community'' for several reasons, but the ridiculous promiscuity / STD problems is the thing that will always make be firmly stay in the permavirgin camp.
It's just not worth the risk of a permanent STD. Or several...
Frankly, I wish I was straight. ( I routinely see people say homosexuality comes from grooming / sexual abuse, but nobody abused me. My brain is just wired wrong. )
From the article.
I’ve tried to talk with my gay friends about how I feel but they respond like I’m from another planet, as if I’m questioning why they want to breathe oxygen.
That's the impression I get reading journoids mention their drug/sex binges as turbosluts who collect STDs like they are no big deal when they caught monkeypox ''despite being careful'' (lol).
Too bad we actually have to share the same planet ( hello HIV, hello Monkeypox, hellow drug-resistant bacterial STDs ).
That reply cherry pick :
You can’t change other people or a community.
Well ''the community'' will remain a petri-dish from which some of the most horrible diseases will emmerge on a periodic basis.
I want nothing to do with ''The Community'' for several reasons, but the ridiculous promiscuity / STD problems is the thing that will always make be firmly stay in the permavirgin camp. ... Frankly, I wish I was straight.
Even if you manage to find a guy to be steady with, anal sex is not a good thing. To quote myself on the issue.
Anal sex should be discouraged. Anal sex makes it easier to spread disease and there is an increased chance of anal prolaspe with the act of anal sex.'
Now, you may be faithful but a future male partner may not be faithful. If he is faithful, he may not be truly honest about his sexual past in regards to STDs. And if you find someone faithful & truthful, that you truly love, you don't want him or yourself to have to deal with issues of anal prolaspe, anal leakage, and hemorrhoids.
I would highly suggest dry humping, particularly the sexual practice known as frotting/frottage. This is to gay men, what scissoring/tribbing/tribadism is to gay women. And of course, oral sex and mutal masterbation are also always better options than anal sex. Do whatever you like, that is just my unsocilited advice.
Don't forget an article around 13 years ago about some nasty fucking slut who liked to eat ass along with his fuckbuddy he called a boyfriend. Boyfriends implies monogamy, a word queens like these cringe from like vampires from a crucifix. He and his buttbuddy (TM SoutPark) got 2 extremely rare diseases just from eating ass from people who regularly left the country, and one foreigner. Him getting the same one twice. They were trying to say it didn't make them nasty and that the community needed to destigmatize eating ass. It wasn't having sexual kinks that was stigmatized, it's being brazenly open and doing it without protection.
It was one of the last times I realized the community had learned nothing from the aids epidemic and had passed me by completely before I just cut my losses and left it. These urban, rich, ivory tower gay elites just want to fuck their way through life and to hell with the consequences. They have no value to themselves or to society, they treat sex like it's breathing, something you do without even realize its happening.
Singapore will finally decriminalise sex between men, its prime minister announced yesterday.
But legalising same-sex marriage is not on the cards, as the government wants to enshrine a ban within its constitution.
My first thought was 'They're making the same mistake the west did. They've got it backwards'.
Men fucking eachother is the absolute least of the problem. The problem is the total lack of - and in many cases outright contempt for monogomy in gay culture. Enshrining the ban of gay marriage? If you're going to have legal homosexuality, you ought to be pushing in the other direction. You should pushing toward ENFORCING gay marriage!
We all know the grim statistics on homosexuals when it comes to things like STD's and pedophilia, but whatever way you slice it, there's still a sizable chunk of gay men who stay clean and aren't kiddy fuckers, even though they live in a culture that encourages them be as base, debauched, frivolous and hedonistic as they wish.
If you want gay rights, then do SOMETHING to encourage gays to be decent!
Any blue city will be full of these sluts. The gay dating scene is just a wreck. It used to be more balanced and was becoming more normal (relationships instead of anonymous hookups). AIDS, Hollywood, and social media fucked that up.
This is precisely the reason why AIDS took off among homosexuals, it wasn't merely because of dicking each other in places that nature did not design for, it was literally because of drug abuse wreaking their immune systems.
You do not have to take my word for this. It is documented in the book Virus Mania. I strongly suggest to everyone to read (or listen) this book because it contains critical information that will direct your entire world view, especially in light of the plandemic.
Hedonism is now the gay lifestyle, it is the lifestyle of most rich elites and those who wish to be them. Human nature is to do what gives the most pleasure for the least amount of effort. Those who follow this path through all aspects of their lives are not people so much as a mindless apes.
I've never seen the gay version of "just be yourself and you'll find the one!"
sooooo many possible reasons that people with no biological reproductive instinct or consequence choose to fuck any and all.....
They're coomers. You can see the straight version of this by looking at the comments section of a porn video. Frankly a gay man looking for a monogamous relationship is best off looking outside that sick culture, as tough as it may be to find someone.
Honestly his best bet is getting out of a large city. Degeneracy tends to conglomerate in heavy blue cities and I just don’t know why…/s
Work at Chick-fil-a and go to a conservative church. You'll find the Confirmed Bachelor of your ascot-wearing dreams. This is financial advice.
Hey, I didn't say it would be easy. But there are conservative gays out there.
The problem is that the degenerates are not politically one sided.
He could just stop being a faggot
From everything that's been relayed to me, it's very hard. As you note, promiscuity is rampant, but relationships are significantly less. Worse, straight people don't typically run into the issue of "I've already met everyone in the straight community here". Gays do. They literally run out of potential options. That's why there are also many gay men who would try to hook up with straight (-ish) men, and will even dress and act in a feminine way. One common refrain I've heard is gay men complaining that the number of gay men who are effeminate and submissive is way to high. Gay men are attracted to: ... wait for it... men (whoa!) and the masculinity that comes with it.
So how hard is it going to be to start a relationship when:
Their chances at starting relationships are worse than even most middle-aged, eggless, carrer, women. When the eggless feminists complain "where are all the good men", they're just complaining about having to compromise, they aren't complaining that they literally ran out of men.
This needs to pounded into the normies' skulls over and over until it sticks. My only quibble is that this applies to all women who are looking for a relationship as opposed to just getting railed by Chad since they typically don't start looking for something serious until their SMV is already in decline.
Sure, that's just the problem of living under a Feminist meta-narrative of reality. Women don't realize they've been deceived until it's way to late for them to protect their own value.
Semi-nonsequitor comment: this isn't the biggest forum, but I get so much enjoyment out of it because of intelligent, educated, well thought out comments like yours. Didn't think my simple upvote conveyed how much I appreciate comments like yours.
Well, thank you very much.
So close. So very close.
These men act this way because they want to be this way. It's easier to be fairies than it is to be a man. It's the same shit as women. It's easier to be frail little things who can't lift a loaf of bread so need you to get it and be the big strong man who does everything for her than to get off her privileged, baby-talking ass and do anything like work. They see femininity as this pass to an easier life and one they don't have to do anything but be feminine, so, they adopt it. It's the mindset of the lazy.
Actually, I think this needs to be a much larger discussion.
Gay men, even hundreds of years ago, have always tended towards being effeminate to attract men. Typically, because there were so few gay men, they were basically trying to attract men who were attracted to women.
What has changed is the social privileges given to gay men, metrosexual men, and effeminate men; while also disincentivizing and spurning masculinity as a society. This has caused weaker willed men to start looking for social status as women, as gay, and as effeminate.
Very long hypothesis short: It makes sense for gay men to be attracted towards masculinity, but it also makes sense for gay men to display femininity in order to attract straight men, who are attracted to femininity.
What we are seeing gays complain about is a flood of feminine gays with no masculine gays to counter. And, we are seeing feminine gays in relationships with feminine gays. I argue this is because there is a significant swath of "gays" that are actually just straight men in a confused and degenerate environment.
And your entire hypothesis is full of shit.
These gays who do effeminate behavior feel no need to embody masculine traits because it is easier for them. It is all learned behavior. While a bit of it might be to what they feel can attract a man, most of it is to fit in with the groups they want to be a part of. Of those groups, most of those traits are from women, who developed it because no one ever disabused them of their irritating damn personality traits.
There are some things gay men can and will do that straight men won't (aside from gay sex/kissing) because there are no women who call them out as 'fags' like those same women would straight men. Men's learned behavior is heavily influenced by women and the need to impress/attract them. Even gay men feel the need to impress them.
Yeah, I'm not going down the "everything is a social construct" route.
No, not really. Gay men don't need to impress women. Most straight men act in response to being attracted to women and wanting their approval. That's pretty normal since they are heterosexual. There's not a social structure that needs to institutionalize them for that.
Moreover, the problem that straight men have is that they aren't socially instructed to gain the approval of women. They are so "snake-bitten" that there are tons of young men who have real drive or ambition in regards to women at all. So, in response, they don't really try to have that drive, they don't introspect very hard, they don't try to be strong & masculine, they don't try to be the provider, and they don't try to be the protector; all because they assumed women had already ejected them from the genetic lottery.
Yep, it much more like a compulsion than a sexuality.
Out of all the predictions made about the consequences of SCOTUS legitimizing gay marriage, the only one that didn't happen was gays marrying.
Gay marriages have absolutely increased since legalization.
That would be true for most things.
Depends on how you define marriage. I’ve yet to meet a gay couple who have consummated the marriage. Even going by the standard of monogamy eliminates 30-50%…
... What?
Hang on a second. Am I fucking crazy?
looks up wikipedia
"In many traditions and statutes of civil or religious law, the consummation of a marriage, often called simply consummation, is the first (or first officially credited) act of sexual intercourse between two people, following their marriage to each other."
Okay, so I do know what that word means.
Why would you ever meet a gay man who didn't have sex with his husband?
You do realize sodomy and sexual intercourse are two completely different things right?
This is just pedantry.
Based
Hang on...
"Sexual intercourse (or coitus or copulation) is a sexual activity typically involving the insertion and thrusting of the penis into the vagina for sexual pleasure, reproduction, or both."
Okay, I get it now.
He's an idiot posing as a genius because he discovered a dictionary. Talk with these people longer and you realize they're full of shit.
I know he's full of shit, and I know it's pedantic, but when he's right, he's right.
It's impossible by definition for two men to get married to each other
Huh, sounds like this might be one of the seemingly few gay men who wasn't raped by a disgusting pedophile as a child. That might be a contributing factor here.
Nope. This is a normal reaction from someone who isn't a 90% slut.
Sounds like one of the unfortunate souls that wants a traditional relationship but only is aroused by the same sex.
I can only give one bit of advise, DON'T use and dating service either on the Internet or some speed dating service if they still exists as the whores try use them to find "sugar daddies" to fund their binge. Ironically maybe try Church or something like it, the holy water keeps them away
Or water in general given how much they shower...
I would say the same thing to straight men and women. And there are more churches that accept gays these days than there are that don't. I don't go to church often, and it was somewhat shocking for me to see clearly-gay couples at my parents' church. But it's in line with their theology.
I say this often, but I want nothing to do with ''The Community'' for several reasons, but the ridiculous promiscuity / STD problems is the thing that will always make be firmly stay in the permavirgin camp.
It's just not worth the risk of a permanent STD. Or several...
Frankly, I wish I was straight. ( I routinely see people say homosexuality comes from grooming / sexual abuse, but nobody abused me. My brain is just wired wrong. )
From the article.
That's the impression I get reading journoids mention their drug/sex binges as turbosluts who collect STDs like they are no big deal when they caught monkeypox ''despite being careful'' (lol).
Too bad we actually have to share the same planet ( hello HIV, hello Monkeypox, hellow drug-resistant bacterial STDs ).
That reply cherry pick :
Well ''the community'' will remain a petri-dish from which some of the most horrible diseases will emmerge on a periodic basis.
In other words : Ewww.
You most likely weren't groomed, you just have the other flavor of Gay: Autism.
Even if you manage to find a guy to be steady with, anal sex is not a good thing. To quote myself on the issue.
Now, you may be faithful but a future male partner may not be faithful. If he is faithful, he may not be truly honest about his sexual past in regards to STDs. And if you find someone faithful & truthful, that you truly love, you don't want him or yourself to have to deal with issues of anal prolaspe, anal leakage, and hemorrhoids.
I would highly suggest dry humping, particularly the sexual practice known as frotting/frottage. This is to gay men, what scissoring/tribbing/tribadism is to gay women. And of course, oral sex and mutal masterbation are also always better options than anal sex. Do whatever you like, that is just my unsocilited advice.
Don't forget an article around 13 years ago about some nasty fucking slut who liked to eat ass along with his fuckbuddy he called a boyfriend. Boyfriends implies monogamy, a word queens like these cringe from like vampires from a crucifix. He and his buttbuddy (TM SoutPark) got 2 extremely rare diseases just from eating ass from people who regularly left the country, and one foreigner. Him getting the same one twice. They were trying to say it didn't make them nasty and that the community needed to destigmatize eating ass. It wasn't having sexual kinks that was stigmatized, it's being brazenly open and doing it without protection.
It was one of the last times I realized the community had learned nothing from the aids epidemic and had passed me by completely before I just cut my losses and left it. These urban, rich, ivory tower gay elites just want to fuck their way through life and to hell with the consequences. They have no value to themselves or to society, they treat sex like it's breathing, something you do without even realize its happening.
Earlier today I saw this this
My first thought was 'They're making the same mistake the west did. They've got it backwards'.
Men fucking eachother is the absolute least of the problem. The problem is the total lack of - and in many cases outright contempt for monogomy in gay culture. Enshrining the ban of gay marriage? If you're going to have legal homosexuality, you ought to be pushing in the other direction. You should pushing toward ENFORCING gay marriage!
We all know the grim statistics on homosexuals when it comes to things like STD's and pedophilia, but whatever way you slice it, there's still a sizable chunk of gay men who stay clean and aren't kiddy fuckers, even though they live in a culture that encourages them be as base, debauched, frivolous and hedonistic as they wish.
If you want gay rights, then do SOMETHING to encourage gays to be decent!
If gay men wanted to be decent they wouldn't be gay
Imagine if every woman on earth was an ugly boner-killer, and you are imagining life as a gay man.
Gay men hate women so much that they invented drag, a blackface performance centered around ridiculing women and calling them all dumb whores.
Really, its not surprising that they'll fuck anything and everything else.
No one is forcing them to fuck women, they can just not have sex if they hate it so much, but they choose to be degenerates instead.
Also if they can get off to other men they are capable of having sex with women.
The little faggots these days learn nothing. It's literally staring them right in the pox-ridden face and they still don't get it.
This might also be a problem of living in DC. A lot of people in this town are like that.
Any blue city will be full of these sluts. The gay dating scene is just a wreck. It used to be more balanced and was becoming more normal (relationships instead of anonymous hookups). AIDS, Hollywood, and social media fucked that up.
Hedonism is the homosexual lifestyle.
This is precisely the reason why AIDS took off among homosexuals, it wasn't merely because of dicking each other in places that nature did not design for, it was literally because of drug abuse wreaking their immune systems.
You do not have to take my word for this. It is documented in the book Virus Mania. I strongly suggest to everyone to read (or listen) this book because it contains critical information that will direct your entire world view, especially in light of the plandemic.
Hedonism is now the gay lifestyle, it is the lifestyle of most rich elites and those who wish to be them. Human nature is to do what gives the most pleasure for the least amount of effort. Those who follow this path through all aspects of their lives are not people so much as a mindless apes.