It's not just faggots and trannies who groom kids. Polyamorous weirdos do it as well. The only real question is how many P's we need to add to the alphabet soup. Grooming aside this is actually a good look into how polyamorous "relationships" work in practice. The girl was using her Barbie dolls to reenact all the fucked up shit her degenerate parents did in front of her.
The dudes are either sleeping around themselves or are just beta cucks who can't do any better. Frankly I have more respect for an incel than a guy who puts up with that shit. The women are almost always low quality women who are just doing freaky shit in bed to try to keep men, which of course doesn't work for high quality men.
The dudes are either sleeping around themselves or are just beta cucks who can't do any better
Typically men sleeping around are almost never in a poly relationship because they don't need to be. The ones who can get it on demand don't want a social anchor to impede things.
The "men" who are "poly" tend to be desperate enough that not only will they "share" with other "men" but without fail when these groups post pictures of themselves it literally a ham planet and several stereotypical beta [or worse]orbiters that can't do any better who embody the concept of neckbeards and soyboys.
Most women do not want this kind of man as a partner, and for the ones who can't do any better they don't want to be stuck with one all the time hence a "poly" group where the woman gets to feign being able to pick from several options and not have to spend all her time with one of them if she doesn't want to.
Polyamory is almost always suggested and initiated by a woman in a relationship who wants the following:
To sleep with specific other men, and they will be specific and likely ones she already picked out before even bringing up the topic.
To keep the existing relationship because of the safe backup it provides in terms of emotional, monetary, social, and living support.
To be the only one who is actually poly.
First off it is almost without exception universally easier for a woman to fuck someone than it is for a man. In terms of supply and demand they are the supply side for sex. Yes there are men out there who will be the ones in demand but they are the top 20% going by reports made by dating apps where 80% of men are considered 'average or below'. Which means roughly 50% of women in some dating apps only focus on the 20% of their options. And this 50% includes literal "5s" who still don't really have to put in much effort to get someone to fuck them.
So any woman who goes from "in a relationship" to "open" is going to sleep with someone else probably before her boyfriend has even considered who his options might be. It could even be the same day if not hour the conversation happens.
Second, if women are being smart about this, and by "smart" I mean "insidious", any women looking to leverage the idea of polyamory to best work for her will initiate the topic, already have her target[s] planned as outlined in point 1, sleep with them asap as outlined in point 2, and then pull a sob story after if/when the man makes any headway with his own possible partners. A sob story that will be half "I don't want to lose you/[my safety pick]" and half "It's not what I wanted/thought it would be", and of those two halves the former will be true while the latter will not.
She doesn't want to lose the safety pick, but she definitely got exactly what she wanted from her slut speedrun before the boyfriend had a chance to also hook up with someone else.
A man with two wives that he takes care of forever and all their children is almost never what is meant by polyamory. Like, I guess technically it is, but if they were just polygamous they'd call themselves that. Or some nicer term that they feel is fitting. Polyamory means pretty exclusively degeneracy.
The problem is that allowing women to lead coomer lifestyles never ends well because they quickly lose their ability to pair bond as their n count goes up. You don't have to do any more than look at the world around us to see proof of that.
The historical "he has two wives" version seems infinitely more stable than the "IDK, fuck whoever" version.
Correct. When men have multiple partners it creates problems at the societal level (mainly leftover men) but it can work quite well at the individual household level if the dude is alpha enough to control the household. A woman banging multiple dudes (ie cucking all of them at once) doesn't even work at that level. The cuck fights can and often do escalate into violence and even murder. Unless it's purely about sex it's not sustainable, and even then it almost never leads to a good outcome.
IIRC wasn't there a "group" but where one of them got super angry, abused a child(of which no one knows who the father was I think)? I seem to remember them being paraded around in a couple shitty articles and youtube videos by "trusted sources" to show how "good" polyamory is. That was a while back though by now. These relationships don't work and never will.
Eh, wouldn't they say they're from whatever tribe, and whatever land that they called it before white people showed up? It's kind of like the occasional debate over what American Indians should be called. They do occasionally refer to themselves as Indian, and rarely native American, but mostly they'd say they're something like Cherokee.
Polynesian is the equivalent of saying Cherokee or Dinatah. It's the same group, bit different tribes. Especially useful when you don't want to mix up Tongan and Samoan.
Its all just hedonism in general. Gays, polys, trannies, women even all live for pure personal pleasure. They all are taught to embrace hedonistic desires as their first choice, and it creates these cycles. Where nothing is enough and the taboo needs to keep happening to even excite them.
The girl was using her Barbie dolls to reenact all the fucked up shit her degenerate parents did in front of her.
Eww. That girl is lost. She'll end up an angry, lonely femcel who hides her femininity and doesn't know how to have healthy relationships, or she's gonna be the sloot who does anything with boys in middle school and years later claims they raped her. Might even turn full feminazi lez misandrist. And that's without all the trans trend shit going on in schools. There's no way to predict how that will end up.
How do you know? People are resilient and most can deal with this sort of trauma without going sideways. It's not like children were forced to watch sex acts or raped--the irresponsible "parents" were just oblivious and selfish.
Where is all the vitriol coming from in these comments? I think the tranny social contagion has everyone's pervert radar working overtime.
Didn't say I know, it was just an educated guess based on the article text and how children often repress or act out on early exposure to sexual content.
Where is all the vitriol coming from
Yeah I dunno, people get triggered by child molesters and groomers for some crazy reason.
It's not just faggots and trannies who groom kids. Polyamorous weirdos do it as well. The only real question is how many P's we need to add to the alphabet soup. Grooming aside this is actually a good look into how polyamorous "relationships" work in practice. The girl was using her Barbie dolls to reenact all the fucked up shit her degenerate parents did in front of her.
The dudes are either sleeping around themselves or are just beta cucks who can't do any better. Frankly I have more respect for an incel than a guy who puts up with that shit. The women are almost always low quality women who are just doing freaky shit in bed to try to keep men, which of course doesn't work for high quality men.
Typically men sleeping around are almost never in a poly relationship because they don't need to be. The ones who can get it on demand don't want a social anchor to impede things.
The "men" who are "poly" tend to be desperate enough that not only will they "share" with other "men" but without fail when these groups post pictures of themselves it literally a ham planet and several stereotypical beta [or worse]orbiters that can't do any better who embody the concept of neckbeards and soyboys. Most women do not want this kind of man as a partner, and for the ones who can't do any better they don't want to be stuck with one all the time hence a "poly" group where the woman gets to feign being able to pick from several options and not have to spend all her time with one of them if she doesn't want to.
Polyamory is almost always suggested and initiated by a woman in a relationship who wants the following:
To sleep with specific other men, and they will be specific and likely ones she already picked out before even bringing up the topic.
To keep the existing relationship because of the safe backup it provides in terms of emotional, monetary, social, and living support.
To be the only one who is actually poly.
First off it is almost without exception universally easier for a woman to fuck someone than it is for a man. In terms of supply and demand they are the supply side for sex. Yes there are men out there who will be the ones in demand but they are the top 20% going by reports made by dating apps where 80% of men are considered 'average or below'. Which means roughly 50% of women in some dating apps only focus on the 20% of their options. And this 50% includes literal "5s" who still don't really have to put in much effort to get someone to fuck them. So any woman who goes from "in a relationship" to "open" is going to sleep with someone else probably before her boyfriend has even considered who his options might be. It could even be the same day if not hour the conversation happens.
Second, if women are being smart about this, and by "smart" I mean "insidious", any women looking to leverage the idea of polyamory to best work for her will initiate the topic, already have her target[s] planned as outlined in point 1, sleep with them asap as outlined in point 2, and then pull a sob story after if/when the man makes any headway with his own possible partners. A sob story that will be half "I don't want to lose you/[my safety pick]" and half "It's not what I wanted/thought it would be", and of those two halves the former will be true while the latter will not. She doesn't want to lose the safety pick, but she definitely got exactly what she wanted from her slut speedrun before the boyfriend had a chance to also hook up with someone else.
A man with two wives that he takes care of forever and all their children is almost never what is meant by polyamory. Like, I guess technically it is, but if they were just polygamous they'd call themselves that. Or some nicer term that they feel is fitting. Polyamory means pretty exclusively degeneracy.
The problem is that allowing women to lead coomer lifestyles never ends well because they quickly lose their ability to pair bond as their n count goes up. You don't have to do any more than look at the world around us to see proof of that.
Correct. When men have multiple partners it creates problems at the societal level (mainly leftover men) but it can work quite well at the individual household level if the dude is alpha enough to control the household. A woman banging multiple dudes (ie cucking all of them at once) doesn't even work at that level. The cuck fights can and often do escalate into violence and even murder. Unless it's purely about sex it's not sustainable, and even then it almost never leads to a good outcome.
Is it, though?
IIRC wasn't there a "group" but where one of them got super angry, abused a child(of which no one knows who the father was I think)? I seem to remember them being paraded around in a couple shitty articles and youtube videos by "trusted sources" to show how "good" polyamory is. That was a while back though by now. These relationships don't work and never will.
You'll live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension.
I wish it had only been the atomic bomb...
I wish it had been a few more atomic bombs...
I dislike polyamory not only for the sin, but because Polynesians now have to explain their own heritage when they say they are Poly.
Eh, wouldn't they say they're from whatever tribe, and whatever land that they called it before white people showed up? It's kind of like the occasional debate over what American Indians should be called. They do occasionally refer to themselves as Indian, and rarely native American, but mostly they'd say they're something like Cherokee.
Polynesian is the equivalent of saying Cherokee or Dinatah. It's the same group, bit different tribes. Especially useful when you don't want to mix up Tongan and Samoan.
Ain't Polynesia a Latin word, though? I just assumed cuz "poly"
Its all just hedonism in general. Gays, polys, trannies, women even all live for pure personal pleasure. They all are taught to embrace hedonistic desires as their first choice, and it creates these cycles. Where nothing is enough and the taboo needs to keep happening to even excite them.
Eww. That girl is lost. She'll end up an angry, lonely femcel who hides her femininity and doesn't know how to have healthy relationships, or she's gonna be the sloot who does anything with boys in middle school and years later claims they raped her. Might even turn full feminazi lez misandrist. And that's without all the trans trend shit going on in schools. There's no way to predict how that will end up.
How do you know? People are resilient and most can deal with this sort of trauma without going sideways. It's not like children were forced to watch sex acts or raped--the irresponsible "parents" were just oblivious and selfish.
Where is all the vitriol coming from in these comments? I think the tranny social contagion has everyone's pervert radar working overtime.
Didn't say I know, it was just an educated guess based on the article text and how children often repress or act out on early exposure to sexual content.
Yeah I dunno, people get triggered by child molesters and groomers for some crazy reason.