The last time #IStandWithAmberHeard trended on Twitter I almost posted about it here because I noticed something interesting. It started trending between 5 and 6 AM EST, and most of the pro-Heard accounts involved seemed to be American. I find it highly suspect that this would happen organically.
It fizzled out because around the time people on the east coast actually started waking up it turned into a bunch of posts mocking her.
Some time ago we had a screenshot of a twitter admin panel and it had functions like "trend blacklist". I wouldn't be surprised if there are hidden options like bump trend to front page or something like that.
If you still have doubts then google "buy twitter likes" and despair.
If that is still not enough then recall how Elon Musk backed down from Twitter purchase because it turned out 90% user base are bots.
Social Media aren't organic anymore. It's all propaganda with false numbers of likes.
TUG has documented all this extensively. She even has a bot network working for her and threatening to sue him for revealing it. The same company also has a scoring system to identify automated social media accounts on twitter and does a poor job of marking some very obvious ones.
And the disturbing thing is she didn't pay for it because she doesn't even have money. She still has powerful institutional players white knighting for her because a man can't be allowed to win.
Absolutely fantastic. The trial was extremely damaging for the wokies. The longer this drags on, the better. Hopefully 10 years.
And it doesn't matter who wins. Even if Heard wins, it's a win - because it will wake a lot of people up.
Also, stop archiving mobile Twitter links. Manually remove the 'mobile' if you are on a phone. It makes it significantly harder to find dirt when some of it is under 'mobile'.
Because if she wins, it will only discredit the judicial system. I'd like for JD win because it seems to me to be the just outcome, but it's not bad for Heard to win from a Realpolitik POV.
It won't work, because people know and love Johnny Depp. It would work if he was a nobody.
But if they bombard people with propaganda (as they have), they will only further discredit themselves.
The war will not be won in one battle. The skinsuits will have to be discredited with a thousand cuts.
Indeed, they were already whining about how the Amber Heard trial was a new Gamergate. Best case scenario is if the verdict is vacated and we get another trial.
She's lying about the evidence. Again. Expect a liar to lie.
This is nothing but a PR push. If she had exonerating evidence, it would have been front and center in Virginia.
What she has is therapist's notes which were excluded. They were excluded because they're basically her lying and fabricating lies about Johnny in real time-- and the therapist nodding along. They are hearsay, and have no legal weight in a court of law. The court of public opinion is a different story.
Expect a second lawsuit if she gets the 'tell-all' book deal and commits further to this lie.
Unless her evidence is "it wasn't me, it was my evil twin doppelganger who brainwashed me as she tormented Johnny!" ,this is just another attempt to try and bring a man down that effectively ended his own cancellation.
Wait, Amber's legal team called me, want me to join as my idea was better than their entire legal teams arguments.
YouTube has started purging channels that "targeted" Amber from the payment program, meaning that none of the supporters of Depp will be paid for their content.
Women stick together, as always. There's no way they didn't co-ordinate with YouTube.
Men typically do better in family courts run by female judges, because they know how other women behave, and male judges are more easily persuaded by crocodile tears.
I mean, I know this is a joke, but isn't this exactly how the myth of the good women coming to save us that placates the tradcons works?
No. That's not how any of this works. No traditionalists are claiming women will save us. That's a strawman.
You don't blame the many for the crimes of the few. That's the principle at play.
They have that false sense of security, and they are just watching as women steal all of their rights away.
For the nth time, the women are a catspaw for the leftists, the communists. They use women because of societal bias and women's in group bias to chip away at rights, because the identity politics gets a voting block behind it. Voting blocks matter in a republic that votes.
It's not women. It's the people saying 'won't you think of the wahmen and chillunz' and being listened to by the electorate.
You need to look at Women like a trojan horse, and ask what ideology is inside-- but you stop at the pair of tits and decry the child bearing half of humanity. It's even stupider than the 'trad cuck' nonsense you claim they preach.
You throw out the babies with the bathwater, because without women there is no future as a species.
I mean, I know this is a joke, but isn't this exactly how the myth of the good women coming to save us that placates the tradcons works?
Who said that anyone is going to 'save' anyone?
They have that false sense of security, and they are just watching as women steal all of their rights away.
You keep whining about rights in marriage, when you have no intention of ever getting married (but you will), and about false rape accusations, when you don't even date. So how exactly are you being bothered by the women?
It's a fairly common position, particularly in MRA communities, that women just don't know how bad things are for us and if they knew, they'd support changing it.
Am I not allowed to defend people who are more trusting than me from being exploited?
It's a fairly common position, particularly in MRA communities, that women just don't know how bad things are for us and if they knew, they'd support changing it.
Things aren't bad for me at all though. And there are many women who do support changing what ails about the system.
Am I not allowed to defend people who are more trusting than me from being exploited?
No, it's just weird that you are so angry all the time about something that does not affect you at all. It's like the comfortable feminists who constantly whine about the alleged injustices done. You both read horror stories online and assume that it is the norm. Throughout most of the world, even in the West, men and women get along perfectly fine.
It doesn't help when you define more than half the human population as "genocide advocating pieces of shit" though.
I mean, I've heard basically 96% of all the women I've ever met in life say some variation of "kill/enslave all men" at some point. Even if it was in jest, it's an awful lot of them saying it. Not to mention the fact that men being lesser than women is kind of a core tenet of feminism. It's even in the name.
In contrast, aside from the Imp here, I've only ever heard the corollary from men who are bottom of the barrel beta males who think all women should be sex slaves.
And even Imp only has his views as a reaction to women's treatment and disdain for men over decades, unlike the few I've met who have their views due to their own inability to accept their social/sexual ranking.
This puts you on par with the Democrats that did the same thing some years back. Although they likely only felt bad about being caught out and publicly called on it rather than the fact they insulted children with cancer.
She's trending because she paid for it.
The last time #IStandWithAmberHeard trended on Twitter I almost posted about it here because I noticed something interesting. It started trending between 5 and 6 AM EST, and most of the pro-Heard accounts involved seemed to be American. I find it highly suspect that this would happen organically.
It fizzled out because around the time people on the east coast actually started waking up it turned into a bunch of posts mocking her.
I'll have to see if I can find the archives.
If it is suspicious then only because it is.
Some time ago we had a screenshot of a twitter admin panel and it had functions like "trend blacklist". I wouldn't be surprised if there are hidden options like bump trend to front page or something like that.
If you still have doubts then google "buy twitter likes" and despair.
If that is still not enough then recall how Elon Musk backed down from Twitter purchase because it turned out 90% user base are bots.
Social Media aren't organic anymore. It's all propaganda with false numbers of likes.
TUG has documented all this extensively. She even has a bot network working for her and threatening to sue him for revealing it. The same company also has a scoring system to identify automated social media accounts on twitter and does a poor job of marking some very obvious ones.
And the disturbing thing is she didn't pay for it because she doesn't even have money. She still has powerful institutional players white knighting for her because a man can't be allowed to win.
Absolutely fantastic. The trial was extremely damaging for the wokies. The longer this drags on, the better. Hopefully 10 years.
And it doesn't matter who wins. Even if Heard wins, it's a win - because it will wake a lot of people up.
Also, stop archiving mobile Twitter links. Manually remove the 'mobile' if you are on a phone. It makes it significantly harder to find dirt when some of it is under 'mobile'.
It really does matter who wins. Why do you think she keeps pointing to her "win" in my corrupt female supremacist birth country?
Secondary archive
Because if she wins, it will only discredit the judicial system. I'd like for JD win because it seems to me to be the just outcome, but it's not bad for Heard to win from a Realpolitik POV.
You're giving normies too much credit.
They'll just be bombarded with propaganda accusing Depp of being the greatest liar in history.
It won't work, because people know and love Johnny Depp. It would work if he was a nobody.
But if they bombard people with propaganda (as they have), they will only further discredit themselves.
The war will not be won in one battle. The skinsuits will have to be discredited with a thousand cuts.
Indeed, they were already whining about how the Amber Heard trial was a new Gamergate. Best case scenario is if the verdict is vacated and we get another trial.
She's lying about the evidence. Again. Expect a liar to lie.
This is nothing but a PR push. If she had exonerating evidence, it would have been front and center in Virginia.
What she has is therapist's notes which were excluded. They were excluded because they're basically her lying and fabricating lies about Johnny in real time-- and the therapist nodding along. They are hearsay, and have no legal weight in a court of law. The court of public opinion is a different story.
Expect a second lawsuit if she gets the 'tell-all' book deal and commits further to this lie.
Ah, the old Christine Blatant Fraud whitewash.
Is her evidence: She's a narcissist, and doesn't understand why the court did not do as she told it to do?
Actually and unironically, yes.
It's present-day documents made by someone she paid to write down what she said, and then present it as valid third-party evidence.
Unless her evidence is "it wasn't me, it was my evil twin doppelganger who brainwashed me as she tormented Johnny!" ,this is just another attempt to try and bring a man down that effectively ended his own cancellation.
Wait, Amber's legal team called me, want me to join as my idea was better than their entire legal teams arguments.
checks twitter trends: https://trends24.in/united-states/
no hits.
Nobody gives a shit about Amber Turd anymore. She got BTFO by Johnny's sexy lAtInA lawyer and owes Johnny like 12 million.
Would love to just see headlines reflecting the truth for a change: Lying cunt attacks ex with more lies and slander.
if you have evidence, why didn't you present it in court?
YouTube has started purging channels that "targeted" Amber from the payment program, meaning that none of the supporters of Depp will be paid for their content.
Women stick together, as always. There's no way they didn't co-ordinate with YouTube.
She should have co-ordinated with the evil female judge and the evil female jurors.
I wonder why she didn't.
Maybe they're trying to lure us into a false sense of security. And when the day comes, suddenly, the women will strike.
Men typically do better in family courts run by female judges, because they know how other women behave, and male judges are more easily persuaded by crocodile tears.
I mean, I know this is a joke, but isn't this exactly how the myth of the good women coming to save us that placates the tradcons works?
They have that false sense of security, and they are just watching as women steal all of their rights away.
No. That's not how any of this works. No traditionalists are claiming women will save us. That's a strawman.
You don't blame the many for the crimes of the few. That's the principle at play.
For the nth time, the women are a catspaw for the leftists, the communists. They use women because of societal bias and women's in group bias to chip away at rights, because the identity politics gets a voting block behind it. Voting blocks matter in a republic that votes.
It's not women. It's the people saying 'won't you think of the wahmen and chillunz' and being listened to by the electorate.
You need to look at Women like a trojan horse, and ask what ideology is inside-- but you stop at the pair of tits and decry the child bearing half of humanity. It's even stupider than the 'trad cuck' nonsense you claim they preach.
You throw out the babies with the bathwater, because without women there is no future as a species.
Who said that anyone is going to 'save' anyone?
You keep whining about rights in marriage, when you have no intention of ever getting married (but you will), and about false rape accusations, when you don't even date. So how exactly are you being bothered by the women?
It's a fairly common position, particularly in MRA communities, that women just don't know how bad things are for us and if they knew, they'd support changing it.
Am I not allowed to defend people who are more trusting than me from being exploited?
Things aren't bad for me at all though. And there are many women who do support changing what ails about the system.
No, it's just weird that you are so angry all the time about something that does not affect you at all. It's like the comfortable feminists who constantly whine about the alleged injustices done. You both read horror stories online and assume that it is the norm. Throughout most of the world, even in the West, men and women get along perfectly fine.
Depp pops so many pills and does so many drugs and gets fucked up so much, it's obvious he would not be able to get his dick hard on demand.
Whoever that "cocainecross" twitter account is, is clearly an Amber Heard simp, is seething, and is pushing a lot of lies, anyway.
They are saying that his ED made him angry and he took it out on her.
It's typical woman logic.
As drugged up as he was, I believe he had issues at times absolutely.
Irrelevant, heard is still a turd.
I would laugh at bald women, but for the fact that one time I did on social media and she was a cancer patient.
I felt almost as awful of a person as my enemy.
That is... surprisingly decent of you.
But won't stop ConPro or whoever that was from downvoting you anyway.
I don't know why it's surprising. I'm a nice person, except to genocide advocating pieces of shit.
It doesn't help when you define more than half the human population as "genocide advocating pieces of shit" though.
I mean, I've heard basically 96% of all the women I've ever met in life say some variation of "kill/enslave all men" at some point. Even if it was in jest, it's an awful lot of them saying it. Not to mention the fact that men being lesser than women is kind of a core tenet of feminism. It's even in the name.
In contrast, aside from the Imp here, I've only ever heard the corollary from men who are bottom of the barrel beta males who think all women should be sex slaves.
And even Imp only has his views as a reaction to women's treatment and disdain for men over decades, unlike the few I've met who have their views due to their own inability to accept their social/sexual ranking.
Dare I ask where you live? I don't want people to make it more easy to doxx them, but this does not sound normal.
murica
This puts you on par with the Democrats that did the same thing some years back. Although they likely only felt bad about being caught out and publicly called on it rather than the fact they insulted children with cancer.