Because if she wins, it will only discredit the judicial system. I'd like for JD win because it seems to me to be the just outcome, but it's not bad for Heard to win from a Realpolitik POV.
It won't work, because people know and love Johnny Depp. It would work if he was a nobody.
But if they bombard people with propaganda (as they have), they will only further discredit themselves.
The war will not be won in one battle. The skinsuits will have to be discredited with a thousand cuts.
Indeed, they were already whining about how the Amber Heard trial was a new Gamergate. Best case scenario is if the verdict is vacated and we get another trial.
She's lying about the evidence. Again. Expect a liar to lie.
This is nothing but a PR push. If she had exonerating evidence, it would have been front and center in Virginia.
What she has is therapist's notes which were excluded. They were excluded because they're basically her lying and fabricating lies about Johnny in real time-- and the therapist nodding along. They are hearsay, and have no legal weight in a court of law. The court of public opinion is a different story.
Expect a second lawsuit if she gets the 'tell-all' book deal and commits further to this lie.
It really does matter who wins. Why do you think she keeps pointing to her "win" in my corrupt female supremacist birth country?
Secondary archive
Because if she wins, it will only discredit the judicial system. I'd like for JD win because it seems to me to be the just outcome, but it's not bad for Heard to win from a Realpolitik POV.
You're giving normies too much credit.
They'll just be bombarded with propaganda accusing Depp of being the greatest liar in history.
It won't work, because people know and love Johnny Depp. It would work if he was a nobody.
But if they bombard people with propaganda (as they have), they will only further discredit themselves.
The war will not be won in one battle. The skinsuits will have to be discredited with a thousand cuts.
Indeed, they were already whining about how the Amber Heard trial was a new Gamergate. Best case scenario is if the verdict is vacated and we get another trial.
She's lying about the evidence. Again. Expect a liar to lie.
This is nothing but a PR push. If she had exonerating evidence, it would have been front and center in Virginia.
What she has is therapist's notes which were excluded. They were excluded because they're basically her lying and fabricating lies about Johnny in real time-- and the therapist nodding along. They are hearsay, and have no legal weight in a court of law. The court of public opinion is a different story.
Expect a second lawsuit if she gets the 'tell-all' book deal and commits further to this lie.