the other is weirdly deliberate and has shades of some sort of mental disorder. Like wanting to fulfill a fantasy of being a war widow.
There's nothing really weird though. We have IVF and people often "freeze" eggs and sperm for later use. If the woman planned it with the guy and he ends up dying before she gets pregnant, and she wants his genetic line to continue in his memory, I personally find that touching.
It's sad the kid won't know his father except through pictures and stories, but it's far better than a deadbeat dad. At least the kid still has a somewhat positive father figure in his life.
I lean towards this being worse because in the one-night-stand case, there's the case where IF she knew who the father is, she'd involve him.
I have a friend with a deadbeat dad of 3 kids. No, believe me, a dead war hero would be much better. The kids know their father is alive, know he's a deadbeat and at this point, even the kids don't want anything to do with him and prefer when he's not around (and thankfully, he only comes out to "see them" once every 5-6 months, for an hour, then gets mad and leaves).
I wouldn't think going out and getting pregnant deliberately anonymously
They literally have sperm banks now. Any woman can get pregnant at any time without a boyfriend. Seriously, in all scenarios, her dead war hero husband is like the best case.
I'm relatively socially conservative outside of abortion, and even there I don't mind if its highly restricted, I just don't want a bunch of future criminal babies. Fatherless children are far more likely to grow up to bad outcomes. I oppose all the LGBT shit, and continue to oppose gay marriage.
I believe in free speech and am more libertarian when it comes to personal freedoms as long as there isn't significant harm being inflicted on society. Single motherhood inflicts clear harm on society so the government shouldn't be encouraging or subsidizing it. Since the destruction of the family is harmful to society, I think the government needs to be combating that. Sadly, the political Left is all-in on destroying the family.
I'm socially conservative when it comes to the government and legal system being pro-family, and pro- mother + father dual parent households. I oppose gay marriage (civil unions is fine), gay adoption, and I think it's healthy for society to look down on all LGBTs and portray them as a lawful but inferior alternative to a traditional family and being straight. LGBTs are not "equal" to straights. I think there is strong evidence through cormorbidity that ALL the LGBTs are mentally ill, not just the trannies. I'd also ban them from the military & high level positions in government.
Prostitution should be legal. If a woman wants to be a whore because it's easy money, it isn't the government's job to waste lots of taxpayer money to lock her up. Freedom means you can't impose your values and morality on everyone else. If you can do it, so can they. It's also quite frankly stupid that you can pay to fuck a girl 100% legally as long as there is a camera or web cam involved. Illegal whore magically becomes free speech porn star.
All the arguments against prostitution claim that 100% of whores are somehow exploited or enslaved victims, which is just a lie. Nearly all whores are women who are doing the job of their own free will and are motivated by the huge amounts of money they get for it. If a woman is being coerced, that is a crime irrespective of the prostitution angle. And since when are victims thrown in jail?
Prostitution is also "the oldest profession in the world" and even Jesus showed love and kindness to prostitutes. Most more "based" societies, like Japan and South Korea, have pretty open and widespread prostitution and yet still maintain far more traditional values. Prostitution is not an enemy of tradition, it is an enemy of Puritans and feminists.
The main opponents of prostitution in the US are feminists, and I am strongly anti-feminist. While some activists try to advocate for "sex workers" the vast majority of feminists strongly oppose it.
"B-b-ut what would you think if your daughter was a whore???" If I had a daughter, there are a LOT of jobs I'd disapprove of, whore being one of them, but so what? Making it a crime doesn't make it disappear, it just means the whores also get arrested sometimes. But actually, most of them don't: dirty street walkers do, but the higher class escorts pretty much never do. As long as the whores stay out of sight on the internet, the cops totally ignore them. Anyway, women with whore values would still be whores even if it was totally banned, the most you'd ever accomplish is to make sure they couldn't get paid.
I don't like anti-sex puritans. Just let people have sex and leave them alone as long as it isn't out in public or something.
It's a weird fulfilment of old Hebrew law - except the original plan involved having a man's brother be the sperm donor, and the entire thing was a welfare scheme; a husband to support her while she was young, and sons to support her when she was old.
So, I'm gonna just die on this hill and say fuck you if you think this is wrong, fuck you in your taint.
These are men who have served their country, and loved the women you irrationally hate, and can't start a family because of their sacrifice.
So, in response, these women who loved their men, are choosing to continue their man's legacy with a son or daughter. If she didn't give a shit, she'd take the life insurance policy that all soldiers have, walk off with anywhere between $100,000 - $400,000, and marry someone else. We know who these women are, we call them Dependapotomous.
These are women who are using that life insurance policy to raise the children of the men they loved. There's nothing wrong with that, you worthless, resentful, savages.
If this was for their gf/wives and it was 100% consensual - i.e. like an organ donor but you want that stuff to go directly towards your wife/gf ONLY, I don't see why that's wrong.
But it going to fucking STRANGERS? What the fuck?
When she gave birth to Veronica, the Russian-born Akselrod was 42 and divorced with a teenage son. She doesn’t consider herself German’s widow, only the mother of his child.
I seem to recall the Torah says that if a married man dies without children, his brother must get her pregnant so his brother will have an heir. Seems like a modern version of that.
You are fighting against something, yet your financial position is in favor of it.
Yeah, so? I have no qualms at all about owning any kind of stock, and in fact, if you own any stock, you're owning stock in woke corporations. By your own standards, you are a hypocrite.
It would be like if I opened huge shorts against United Airlines and said lockdowns should never happen again. My financial position betrays my true interests.
No, dumbass, that betrays your actual prediction. I can say that lockdowns are a very bad thing, and say that they will probably happen again, and therefore short United Airlines. Are you really incapable of making any sort of distinction?
Better a father that died a hero, than an anonymous donor she slept with one night and doesn't remember because she was intoxicated.
There's nothing really weird though. We have IVF and people often "freeze" eggs and sperm for later use. If the woman planned it with the guy and he ends up dying before she gets pregnant, and she wants his genetic line to continue in his memory, I personally find that touching.
It's sad the kid won't know his father except through pictures and stories, but it's far better than a deadbeat dad. At least the kid still has a somewhat positive father figure in his life.
I have a friend with a deadbeat dad of 3 kids. No, believe me, a dead war hero would be much better. The kids know their father is alive, know he's a deadbeat and at this point, even the kids don't want anything to do with him and prefer when he's not around (and thankfully, he only comes out to "see them" once every 5-6 months, for an hour, then gets mad and leaves).
They literally have sperm banks now. Any woman can get pregnant at any time without a boyfriend. Seriously, in all scenarios, her dead war hero husband is like the best case.
It's degenerate to knowingly assist in creating a fatherless child. Peak selfishness from the women.
Wow, nice to see some social conservatism from you.
I'm relatively socially conservative outside of abortion, and even there I don't mind if its highly restricted, I just don't want a bunch of future criminal babies. Fatherless children are far more likely to grow up to bad outcomes. I oppose all the LGBT shit, and continue to oppose gay marriage.
Didn't you say you think prostitution is perfectly fine?
I believe in free speech and am more libertarian when it comes to personal freedoms as long as there isn't significant harm being inflicted on society. Single motherhood inflicts clear harm on society so the government shouldn't be encouraging or subsidizing it. Since the destruction of the family is harmful to society, I think the government needs to be combating that. Sadly, the political Left is all-in on destroying the family.
I'm socially conservative when it comes to the government and legal system being pro-family, and pro- mother + father dual parent households. I oppose gay marriage (civil unions is fine), gay adoption, and I think it's healthy for society to look down on all LGBTs and portray them as a lawful but inferior alternative to a traditional family and being straight. LGBTs are not "equal" to straights. I think there is strong evidence through cormorbidity that ALL the LGBTs are mentally ill, not just the trannies. I'd also ban them from the military & high level positions in government.
Prostitution should be legal. If a woman wants to be a whore because it's easy money, it isn't the government's job to waste lots of taxpayer money to lock her up. Freedom means you can't impose your values and morality on everyone else. If you can do it, so can they. It's also quite frankly stupid that you can pay to fuck a girl 100% legally as long as there is a camera or web cam involved. Illegal whore magically becomes free speech porn star.
All the arguments against prostitution claim that 100% of whores are somehow exploited or enslaved victims, which is just a lie. Nearly all whores are women who are doing the job of their own free will and are motivated by the huge amounts of money they get for it. If a woman is being coerced, that is a crime irrespective of the prostitution angle. And since when are victims thrown in jail?
Prostitution is also "the oldest profession in the world" and even Jesus showed love and kindness to prostitutes. Most more "based" societies, like Japan and South Korea, have pretty open and widespread prostitution and yet still maintain far more traditional values. Prostitution is not an enemy of tradition, it is an enemy of Puritans and feminists.
The main opponents of prostitution in the US are feminists, and I am strongly anti-feminist. While some activists try to advocate for "sex workers" the vast majority of feminists strongly oppose it.
"B-b-ut what would you think if your daughter was a whore???" If I had a daughter, there are a LOT of jobs I'd disapprove of, whore being one of them, but so what? Making it a crime doesn't make it disappear, it just means the whores also get arrested sometimes. But actually, most of them don't: dirty street walkers do, but the higher class escorts pretty much never do. As long as the whores stay out of sight on the internet, the cops totally ignore them. Anyway, women with whore values would still be whores even if it was totally banned, the most you'd ever accomplish is to make sure they couldn't get paid.
I don't like anti-sex puritans. Just let people have sex and leave them alone as long as it isn't out in public or something.
At least they can't get 'em for child support.
Imagine actively planning fatherless children.
I guess the idea is that this will allow them to send men into meatgrinders without worrying about the birth rate.
It's a weird fulfilment of old Hebrew law - except the original plan involved having a man's brother be the sperm donor, and the entire thing was a welfare scheme; a husband to support her while she was young, and sons to support her when she was old.
So, I'm gonna just die on this hill and say fuck you if you think this is wrong, fuck you in your taint.
These are men who have served their country, and loved the women you irrationally hate, and can't start a family because of their sacrifice.
So, in response, these women who loved their men, are choosing to continue their man's legacy with a son or daughter. If she didn't give a shit, she'd take the life insurance policy that all soldiers have, walk off with anywhere between $100,000 - $400,000, and marry someone else. We know who these women are, we call them Dependapotomous.
These are women who are using that life insurance policy to raise the children of the men they loved. There's nothing wrong with that, you worthless, resentful, savages.
If this was for their gf/wives and it was 100% consensual - i.e. like an organ donor but you want that stuff to go directly towards your wife/gf ONLY, I don't see why that's wrong.
But it going to fucking STRANGERS? What the fuck?
Post-wall... disgusting.
This seems ghoulish. Quite literally ghoulish.
Finding out your father was dead before you were even conceived is the stuff of nightmares.
Shouldn't they be baby-trapping a live man?
I seem to recall the Torah says that if a married man dies without children, his brother must get her pregnant so his brother will have an heir. Seems like a modern version of that.
“Heh let’s see those stupid storm fags try to twist this one” - Imp
Jester is just going to ban you, because he secretly works for (((women)))
Boo!!
@TheImpossible1, I think graphenium may have just shit his pants!
Name one thing more worthless than 'right-leaning' and 'right-wing' so called parties.
I'm waiting for the right-leaning Empire Strikes Back party.
What are you mad about now? Other than the fact that she is a woman, that is.
No way! How could anyone think that?
That doesn't make you a hypocrite. And I see no evidence that she is 'anti-vaxx'. Not wanting one vaccine does not make you 'anti-vaxx'.
Yeah, so? I have no qualms at all about owning any kind of stock, and in fact, if you own any stock, you're owning stock in woke corporations. By your own standards, you are a hypocrite.
No, dumbass, that betrays your actual prediction. I can say that lockdowns are a very bad thing, and say that they will probably happen again, and therefore short United Airlines. Are you really incapable of making any sort of distinction?