Remember when the man everyone thinks will be the next President turned out to be a shill for the NOW?
I'm sure you won't listen to me, but if I were you, I'd knock that off because it only makes you sound crazy. Not even Democrats (who you claimed were turning on the women, btw) listen to that catlady organization known as the NOW, let alone DeSantis.
he voted against party lines to back what they wanted.
He can align with anyone for reasons other than "he is their puppet". For example, because a bill is unconstitutional.
How you are unable to understand this is a mystery to me. Your one mode of explanation is that someone is being "puppeteered", which betrays 0 understanding of politics, social relations, humanity, and an excess of autism.
I should check which rats who voted against drafting women are up for primarying.
This is the man who got famous by breaking Disney, specifically by breaking the contract between them and the state of Florida.
Incorrect. Giving Disney a special status in law is in no way a 'contract' in perpetuity. It is a privilege that may be revoked at any time.
So...he knows it's constitutional
Your test for whether something is constitution is if it 'hurts women' in your mind.
He's lying through his teeth and hoping you'll fall for it.
I'm not even going to argue against your crazy. Just like with your "Kathy Barnette is a feminist", it just serves to show that you are completely out of your mind.
The President('s husband) is speaking near verbatim the same kind of garbage that Margaret Atwood and her ilk would say?
"Women's rights" is a stock phrase for them. All Democrats. And they also assert that abortion is "women's rights" - though they cannot define what a woman is.
Nah, this is just because women are illogical and vote for anything that tugs their heart strings.
"Folks, lets get one thing straight: the Ultra-MAGA agenda has always been about leaving it up to states to decide policy relating to personal issues." just doesnt galvanize the democrat base.
By that logic, him banning abortion and affecting the employment contracts of abortionists is also unconstitutional.
You're the first guy who says that an actual provision in the Constitution is 'more egregious than Roe vs. Wade'. I guess you do think that Roe vs. Wade as based in the Constitution.
Or his famous move against Disney, which is the only reason anyone knows he exists.
What I'm saying is that he is taking things way out of logical context.
Just for the sake of the argument, let us assume that DeSantis is mistaken about this.
Is the most likely explanation "he made a mistake" (rather, his staff did), or he took constitutionalism too far, or... HE IS BEING PUPPETEERED BY NOW!!!!!!!!
Forcing fairness in divorce
What people regard as 'fair' differs based on the person. For example, I'm pretty sure that you think 'fairness' would be to throw the woman in the case to the sharks.
Maybe some GOP Nazi gender members in the FL legislature voted for it. And you just blindly trust THEM, even though they want you dead and tortured?
is not a significant change to marriage contracts.
It unilaterally changes the terms for parties who agreed under different terms. So it must not be retroactive.
Speaking of the “more feminine way”, I’m surprised you haven’t posted this one yet: https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1542164788062601217
Edit: just realized that you did post it yesterday, I missed that
You would think that someone who is prime minister in a major country could afford a decent fucking haircut.
Explain.
Biden: <Generic shitlib complaining that's been said a gorillion times>
Imp1: The secret agenda is revealed!
I'm sure you won't listen to me, but if I were you, I'd knock that off because it only makes you sound crazy. Not even Democrats (who you claimed were turning on the women, btw) listen to that catlady organization known as the NOW, let alone DeSantis.
He can align with anyone for reasons other than "he is their puppet". For example, because a bill is unconstitutional.
How you are unable to understand this is a mystery to me. Your one mode of explanation is that someone is being "puppeteered", which betrays 0 understanding of politics, social relations, humanity, and an excess of autism.
They're shaking in their boots.
Incorrect. Giving Disney a special status in law is in no way a 'contract' in perpetuity. It is a privilege that may be revoked at any time.
Your test for whether something is constitution is if it 'hurts women' in your mind.
I'm not even going to argue against your crazy. Just like with your "Kathy Barnette is a feminist", it just serves to show that you are completely out of your mind.
"Women's rights" is a stock phrase for them. All Democrats. And they also assert that abortion is "women's rights" - though they cannot define what a woman is.
There you go again.
Nah, this is just because women are illogical and vote for anything that tugs their heart strings.
"Folks, lets get one thing straight: the Ultra-MAGA agenda has always been about leaving it up to states to decide policy relating to personal issues." just doesnt galvanize the democrat base.
https://nitter.it/POTUS/status/1542142703491850241
There is not a single person in the White House that is in charge of anything.
I am pretty sure Kim Potter is acting as President of the United States.
That be President of the United States n sheeit fo u yt.
And not Kamala Harris?
What? This is literally in your Constitution.
You're the first guy who says that an actual provision in the Constitution is 'more egregious than Roe vs. Wade'. I guess you do think that Roe vs. Wade as based in the Constitution.
God damnit, you're salty.
Just for the sake of the argument, let us assume that DeSantis is mistaken about this.
Is the most likely explanation "he made a mistake" (rather, his staff did), or he took constitutionalism too far, or... HE IS BEING PUPPETEERED BY NOW!!!!!!!!
What people regard as 'fair' differs based on the person. For example, I'm pretty sure that you think 'fairness' would be to throw the woman in the case to the sharks.
Maybe some GOP Nazi gender members in the FL legislature voted for it. And you just blindly trust THEM, even though they want you dead and tortured?
It unilaterally changes the terms for parties who agreed under different terms. So it must not be retroactive.
You forgot that I am not interested in your hatred for women.
You just have such obsessions that you are fine with violating the Constitution. That's fine.