By that logic, him banning abortion and affecting the employment contracts of abortionists is also unconstitutional.
You're the first guy who says that an actual provision in the Constitution is 'more egregious than Roe vs. Wade'. I guess you do think that Roe vs. Wade as based in the Constitution.
Or his famous move against Disney, which is the only reason anyone knows he exists.
What I'm saying is that he is taking things way out of logical context.
Just for the sake of the argument, let us assume that DeSantis is mistaken about this.
Is the most likely explanation "he made a mistake" (rather, his staff did), or he took constitutionalism too far, or... HE IS BEING PUPPETEERED BY NOW!!!!!!!!
Forcing fairness in divorce
What people regard as 'fair' differs based on the person. For example, I'm pretty sure that you think 'fairness' would be to throw the woman in the case to the sharks.
Maybe some GOP Nazi gender members in the FL legislature voted for it. And you just blindly trust THEM, even though they want you dead and tortured?
is not a significant change to marriage contracts.
It unilaterally changes the terms for parties who agreed under different terms. So it must not be retroactive.
What? This is literally in your Constitution.
You're the first guy who says that an actual provision in the Constitution is 'more egregious than Roe vs. Wade'. I guess you do think that Roe vs. Wade as based in the Constitution.
God damnit, you're salty.
Just for the sake of the argument, let us assume that DeSantis is mistaken about this.
Is the most likely explanation "he made a mistake" (rather, his staff did), or he took constitutionalism too far, or... HE IS BEING PUPPETEERED BY NOW!!!!!!!!
What people regard as 'fair' differs based on the person. For example, I'm pretty sure that you think 'fairness' would be to throw the woman in the case to the sharks.
Maybe some GOP Nazi gender members in the FL legislature voted for it. And you just blindly trust THEM, even though they want you dead and tortured?
It unilaterally changes the terms for parties who agreed under different terms. So it must not be retroactive.