This is most strange. Troons outrank blacks on the Victimology Scale, and yet the black guy was acquitted for beating to death a troon rapist? Or is the scale shifting imperceptibly again?
Or maybe, since this is a jury trial, the jury may not have received the latest updates? And in that case, maybe they are eminently sensible people who acquitted because "this guy beat to death his rapist" without considering these statuses?
This one wasn't a troon. I posted a few threads on this case when the linebacker was first arrested and the catfisher was just a gay dude who rolled the dice on this scheme one too many times. I even predicted that based on the notable lack of a transphobia angle in the original article.
I might be misremembering but I think the gay guy kept the lights dim, and I know for a fact all he did sexually was blow the guy, which meant his clothing could conceal his manly body. So that's probably how the trapping scheme succeeded up until his encounter with this dude.
So yeah, regardless of whether it's a gay or a tranny trapping is about more than appearance.
The distinction I'm making is that he only claimed to a woman when he was trapping dudes. He never transed himself or claimed to be a woman outside of that.
This is the canonical hierarchy, in America at least (in Europe it's basically the same, with 1 and 2 replaced by Muslims and troons respectively):
Troons [1]> Blacks [2]> Other non-whites [3]> Homosexuals [4]> Women [5]> Whites [6]> Asians
Proof for (1) is Dave Chappelle. Proof for (2) is George Zimmerman. Proof for (4) is August Ames. Proof for (6) is how Asians are disadvantaged in college applications even more than whites are.
This is why I refer to troons and blacks as 'sacred classes' and homosexuals and women merely as semi-sacred classes.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
It's : Women (sometimes) > transgenders > women (when they want to play oppressed) > blacks > other non-whites that vote for women's agenda > gays > Asian and white men.
Very dependent on context. There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators.
I will say I think women do now outrank gays in most situations, so I'll give you one bump to women's hierarchy of AoV's list. But I think for the most part it's accurate, as far as women's ranking goes.
Again, it's context sensitive though. There will be times where women certainly outrank nonwhites, but I don't think it's as common, and certainly not as common as it once was.
There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators
Women as a class are top, not individuals. What serves female supremacy is to ensure their political aims are achieved, and they do this by following the narrative in lockstep. If a few women end up on the wrong side, that isn't important.
Crucial aims of the More Feminine Way :
Men never find out the true goal of feminism.
Men never unite across any divisions against women (This is why they constantly divide, on any metric they can get. Female in group bias keeps them together, so it's an advantage if they keep us infighting)
Boys come out of the schools as broken as possible and unable to mentally resist control of the More Feminine Way
Every avenue of harming males must be kept open
Every tragedy is an opportunity to shift the Overton window towards male genocide.
The easiest way to explain it is, they will throw their own under the bus for later benefit or if it helps harm men.
That's not a good argument. It's basically the 'systemic racism' of sex relations. In interactions between the different women and trannies/nonwhites, it seems like women are thrown under the bus more often than not. So the class of "women" don't seem to outrank the others.
What serves female supremacy is to ensure their political aims are achieved...
Somewhat circular and unfalsifiable argument, since it's loosely defined.
Men never find out the true goal of feminism.
Which is?
Female in group bias keeps them together...
Female in group bias is nowhere near what it used to be. Women will throw each other under the wheels on most issues, if pressed.
Boys come out of the schools as broken as possible and unable to mentally resist control of the More Feminine Way
This is certainly a big problem, that needs addressing. Whether it's specifically the fault or goal of women as a class is another question though. Furthermore, girls are coming out of the schools fucked up massively too. Just because women are more advantaged than men doesn't mean that society is currently benefitting them. They're unhappier than ever, and it seems to be getting worse. Society is crumbling, for men and women.
Every tragedy is an opportunity to shift the Overton window towards male genocide.
I never expected the guy who thinks that women control literally everything to say that.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
It was homosexual 'sex workers' that bullied to death a female 'sex worker'. Sex workers are present on both sides of the equation, which we can cancel out, and what remains is that homosexuals are superior to women.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
Nope, as you can also see by the number of white women who are vilified for having an interaction with a black guy. Like the Central Park woman with the dog.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
You know, I have no sympathy for troons and no sympathy for thugs, but something jumps out at me:
According to testimony, Etute first connected with Smith in April 2021 on the dating app Tinder, with Smith posing as a woman going by the name "Angie Renee." Along with teammate Da'Shawn Elder, Etute went to Smith's Blacksburg apartment on April 10 under the assumption that he was meeting a woman. Elder testified that he was disturbed by the circumstances of the meeting, in which Smith hid his face and kept his apartment nearly pitch dark. Both players initially left, but Etute returned to the apartment, and testified that he received oral sex and a $50 gift from Smith.
Why in the flying fuck would you go back? And how do you not find something suspicious about a "woman" giving YOU money for sex? What, for the privilege of your glorious god-emperor cock?
Also;
Etute testified that he stomped on Smith's face as he departed the apartment, leaving a bloody shoe print on Smith's cheek in the process. Security camera footage in the apartment showed all three players leaving quickly, with Etute having spent only three minutes inside Smith's apartment. Etute testified that Smith was still breathing when he left, and the state's forensic detective testified the entire attack likely took only a few seconds.
Look, not defending the troon rapist in the slightest, but, uh, that's murder, my nigga. You stomped on his face. You didn't punch him and he fell over, hitting his head, you took a second to stomp him while he was down.
This thug should be behind bars. Or, I guess, should ALSO be behind bars, since I'm sure someone will somehow read that as me standing up for the troon.
Yes! This whole story is so bizarre! His coming back a second time was absolutely questionable. I would hope there was evidence to back up that part of things, because "checking" seems ridiculous.
I'm guessing his libido over road his common sense and no fuck the rapist. You could literally decapitate your rapist and I would vote to acquit. Also the dude was reaching for a knife when he got stomped
Instead, the jury believed a self-defense argument that Etute feared for his life after seeing the victim "make a reach" toward his bed where a knife was later found.
Also noteworthy:
On July 1, 2021 -- just more than a month after Smith's death -- Virginia passed a bill restricting the use of the so-called gay panic defense, in which a defendant accused of homicide could receive a lesser sentence by saying they panicked after finding out the victim's sexual orientation or gender identity.
The beheading story in the opposing column is way more interesting. Guy catches his wife in a flirtation with another man, lures man to woods and shoots him, then his wife cuts the guy's head off, claiming she was "forced" to so by the enraged husband.
By the available information he was innocent so while being a football player would help his home field advantage it's not that important. Dude was a rapist with a knife. You can use lethal force for either of those situations
This is most strange. Troons outrank blacks on the Victimology Scale, and yet the black guy was acquitted for beating to death a troon rapist? Or is the scale shifting imperceptibly again?
Or maybe, since this is a jury trial, the jury may not have received the latest updates? And in that case, maybe they are eminently sensible people who acquitted because "this guy beat to death his rapist" without considering these statuses?
This one wasn't a troon. I posted a few threads on this case when the linebacker was first arrested and the catfisher was just a gay dude who rolled the dice on this scheme one too many times. I even predicted that based on the notable lack of a transphobia angle in the original article.
How interesting. He is a homosexual, but he successfully posed as a woman? Or the guy was really drunk.
I've never seen a troon succeed.
In that case, it explains what happened, because blacks outrank homosexuals.
Almost everyone outranks homosexuals nowadays, it seems. Standard, boring gays are, like, so last decade.
Gays still outrank whites in almost all scenarios, but that goes without saying.
I might be misremembering but I think the gay guy kept the lights dim, and I know for a fact all he did sexually was blow the guy, which meant his clothing could conceal his manly body. So that's probably how the trapping scheme succeeded up until his encounter with this dude.
So yeah, regardless of whether it's a gay or a tranny trapping is about more than appearance.
He was gay and larping as a woman.
IF thats not a troon, IDK what is.
The distinction I'm making is that he only claimed to a woman when he was trapping dudes. He never transed himself or claimed to be a woman outside of that.
He's not a tranny, he's a gay guy who harasses straight men.
Women > trans > blacks > other non-whites > gays
This is the canonical hierarchy, in America at least (in Europe it's basically the same, with 1 and 2 replaced by Muslims and troons respectively):
Troons [1]> Blacks [2]> Other non-whites [3]> Homosexuals [4]> Women [5]> Whites [6]> Asians
Proof for (1) is Dave Chappelle. Proof for (2) is George Zimmerman. Proof for (4) is August Ames. Proof for (6) is how Asians are disadvantaged in college applications even more than whites are.
This is why I refer to troons and blacks as 'sacred classes' and homosexuals and women merely as semi-sacred classes.
Women are ranked far too low.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
It's : Women (sometimes) > transgenders > women (when they want to play oppressed) > blacks > other non-whites that vote for women's agenda > gays > Asian and white men.
Very dependent on context. There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators.
I will say I think women do now outrank gays in most situations, so I'll give you one bump to women's hierarchy of AoV's list. But I think for the most part it's accurate, as far as women's ranking goes.
Again, it's context sensitive though. There will be times where women certainly outrank nonwhites, but I don't think it's as common, and certainly not as common as it once was.
Women as a class are top, not individuals. What serves female supremacy is to ensure their political aims are achieved, and they do this by following the narrative in lockstep. If a few women end up on the wrong side, that isn't important.
Crucial aims of the More Feminine Way :
Men never find out the true goal of feminism.
Men never unite across any divisions against women (This is why they constantly divide, on any metric they can get. Female in group bias keeps them together, so it's an advantage if they keep us infighting)
Boys come out of the schools as broken as possible and unable to mentally resist control of the More Feminine Way
Every avenue of harming males must be kept open
Every tragedy is an opportunity to shift the Overton window towards male genocide.
The easiest way to explain it is, they will throw their own under the bus for later benefit or if it helps harm men.
That's not a good argument. It's basically the 'systemic racism' of sex relations. In interactions between the different women and trannies/nonwhites, it seems like women are thrown under the bus more often than not. So the class of "women" don't seem to outrank the others.
Somewhat circular and unfalsifiable argument, since it's loosely defined.
Which is?
Female in group bias is nowhere near what it used to be. Women will throw each other under the wheels on most issues, if pressed.
This is certainly a big problem, that needs addressing. Whether it's specifically the fault or goal of women as a class is another question though. Furthermore, girls are coming out of the schools fucked up massively too. Just because women are more advantaged than men doesn't mean that society is currently benefitting them. They're unhappier than ever, and it seems to be getting worse. Society is crumbling, for men and women.
Please define male genocide.
I never expected the guy who thinks that women control literally everything to say that.
It was homosexual 'sex workers' that bullied to death a female 'sex worker'. Sex workers are present on both sides of the equation, which we can cancel out, and what remains is that homosexuals are superior to women.
Nope, as you can also see by the number of white women who are vilified for having an interaction with a black guy. Like the Central Park woman with the dog.
When are they ever above troons?
You know, I have no sympathy for troons and no sympathy for thugs, but something jumps out at me:
Why in the flying fuck would you go back? And how do you not find something suspicious about a "woman" giving YOU money for sex? What, for the privilege of your glorious god-emperor cock?
Also;
Look, not defending the troon rapist in the slightest, but, uh, that's murder, my nigga. You stomped on his face. You didn't punch him and he fell over, hitting his head, you took a second to stomp him while he was down.
This thug should be behind bars. Or, I guess, should ALSO be behind bars, since I'm sure someone will somehow read that as me standing up for the troon.
Yes! This whole story is so bizarre! His coming back a second time was absolutely questionable. I would hope there was evidence to back up that part of things, because "checking" seems ridiculous.
I'm guessing his libido over road his common sense and no fuck the rapist. You could literally decapitate your rapist and I would vote to acquit. Also the dude was reaching for a knife when he got stomped
Based.
Archive cut off this section:
Also noteworthy:
gay
The beheading story in the opposing column is way more interesting. Guy catches his wife in a flirtation with another man, lures man to woods and shoots him, then his wife cuts the guy's head off, claiming she was "forced" to so by the enraged husband.
All I can think of are Fat Albert jokes.
By the available information he was innocent so while being a football player would help his home field advantage it's not that important. Dude was a rapist with a knife. You can use lethal force for either of those situations