This is the canonical hierarchy, in America at least (in Europe it's basically the same, with 1 and 2 replaced by Muslims and troons respectively):
Troons [1]> Blacks [2]> Other non-whites [3]> Homosexuals [4]> Women [5]> Whites [6]> Asians
Proof for (1) is Dave Chappelle. Proof for (2) is George Zimmerman. Proof for (4) is August Ames. Proof for (6) is how Asians are disadvantaged in college applications even more than whites are.
This is why I refer to troons and blacks as 'sacred classes' and homosexuals and women merely as semi-sacred classes.
Very dependent on context. There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators.
I will say I think women do now outrank gays in most situations, so I'll give you one bump to women's hierarchy of AoV's list. But I think for the most part it's accurate, as far as women's ranking goes.
Again, it's context sensitive though. There will be times where women certainly outrank nonwhites, but I don't think it's as common, and certainly not as common as it once was.
That's not a good argument. It's basically the 'systemic racism' of sex relations. In interactions between the different women and trannies/nonwhites, it seems like women are thrown under the bus more often than not. So the class of "women" don't seem to outrank the others.
What serves female supremacy is to ensure their political aims are achieved...
Somewhat circular and unfalsifiable argument, since it's loosely defined.
Men never find out the true goal of feminism.
Which is?
Female in group bias keeps them together...
Female in group bias is nowhere near what it used to be. Women will throw each other under the wheels on most issues, if pressed.
Boys come out of the schools as broken as possible and unable to mentally resist control of the More Feminine Way
This is certainly a big problem, that needs addressing. Whether it's specifically the fault or goal of women as a class is another question though. Furthermore, girls are coming out of the schools fucked up massively too. Just because women are more advantaged than men doesn't mean that society is currently benefitting them. They're unhappier than ever, and it seems to be getting worse. Society is crumbling, for men and women.
Every tragedy is an opportunity to shift the Overton window towards male genocide.
I never expected the guy who thinks that women control literally everything to say that.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
It was homosexual 'sex workers' that bullied to death a female 'sex worker'. Sex workers are present on both sides of the equation, which we can cancel out, and what remains is that homosexuals are superior to women.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
Nope, as you can also see by the number of white women who are vilified for having an interaction with a black guy. Like the Central Park woman with the dog.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
This is the canonical hierarchy, in America at least (in Europe it's basically the same, with 1 and 2 replaced by Muslims and troons respectively):
Troons [1]> Blacks [2]> Other non-whites [3]> Homosexuals [4]> Women [5]> Whites [6]> Asians
Proof for (1) is Dave Chappelle. Proof for (2) is George Zimmerman. Proof for (4) is August Ames. Proof for (6) is how Asians are disadvantaged in college applications even more than whites are.
This is why I refer to troons and blacks as 'sacred classes' and homosexuals and women merely as semi-sacred classes.
Very dependent on context. There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators.
I will say I think women do now outrank gays in most situations, so I'll give you one bump to women's hierarchy of AoV's list. But I think for the most part it's accurate, as far as women's ranking goes.
Again, it's context sensitive though. There will be times where women certainly outrank nonwhites, but I don't think it's as common, and certainly not as common as it once was.
That's not a good argument. It's basically the 'systemic racism' of sex relations. In interactions between the different women and trannies/nonwhites, it seems like women are thrown under the bus more often than not. So the class of "women" don't seem to outrank the others.
Somewhat circular and unfalsifiable argument, since it's loosely defined.
Which is?
Female in group bias is nowhere near what it used to be. Women will throw each other under the wheels on most issues, if pressed.
This is certainly a big problem, that needs addressing. Whether it's specifically the fault or goal of women as a class is another question though. Furthermore, girls are coming out of the schools fucked up massively too. Just because women are more advantaged than men doesn't mean that society is currently benefitting them. They're unhappier than ever, and it seems to be getting worse. Society is crumbling, for men and women.
Please define male genocide.
I never expected the guy who thinks that women control literally everything to say that.
It was homosexual 'sex workers' that bullied to death a female 'sex worker'. Sex workers are present on both sides of the equation, which we can cancel out, and what remains is that homosexuals are superior to women.
Nope, as you can also see by the number of white women who are vilified for having an interaction with a black guy. Like the Central Park woman with the dog.
When are they ever above troons?