This is the canonical hierarchy, in America at least (in Europe it's basically the same, with 1 and 2 replaced by Muslims and troons respectively):
Troons [1]> Blacks [2]> Other non-whites [3]> Homosexuals [4]> Women [5]> Whites [6]> Asians
Proof for (1) is Dave Chappelle. Proof for (2) is George Zimmerman. Proof for (4) is August Ames. Proof for (6) is how Asians are disadvantaged in college applications even more than whites are.
This is why I refer to troons and blacks as 'sacred classes' and homosexuals and women merely as semi-sacred classes.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
It's : Women (sometimes) > transgenders > women (when they want to play oppressed) > blacks > other non-whites that vote for women's agenda > gays > Asian and white men.
Very dependent on context. There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators.
I will say I think women do now outrank gays in most situations, so I'll give you one bump to women's hierarchy of AoV's list. But I think for the most part it's accurate, as far as women's ranking goes.
Again, it's context sensitive though. There will be times where women certainly outrank nonwhites, but I don't think it's as common, and certainly not as common as it once was.
There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators
Women as a class are top, not individuals. What serves female supremacy is to ensure their political aims are achieved, and they do this by following the narrative in lockstep. If a few women end up on the wrong side, that isn't important.
Crucial aims of the More Feminine Way :
Men never find out the true goal of feminism.
Men never unite across any divisions against women (This is why they constantly divide, on any metric they can get. Female in group bias keeps them together, so it's an advantage if they keep us infighting)
Boys come out of the schools as broken as possible and unable to mentally resist control of the More Feminine Way
Every avenue of harming males must be kept open
Every tragedy is an opportunity to shift the Overton window towards male genocide.
The easiest way to explain it is, they will throw their own under the bus for later benefit or if it helps harm men.
I never expected the guy who thinks that women control literally everything to say that.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
It was homosexual 'sex workers' that bullied to death a female 'sex worker'. Sex workers are present on both sides of the equation, which we can cancel out, and what remains is that homosexuals are superior to women.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
Nope, as you can also see by the number of white women who are vilified for having an interaction with a black guy. Like the Central Park woman with the dog.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
He's not a tranny, he's a gay guy who harasses straight men.
Women > trans > blacks > other non-whites > gays
This is the canonical hierarchy, in America at least (in Europe it's basically the same, with 1 and 2 replaced by Muslims and troons respectively):
Troons [1]> Blacks [2]> Other non-whites [3]> Homosexuals [4]> Women [5]> Whites [6]> Asians
Proof for (1) is Dave Chappelle. Proof for (2) is George Zimmerman. Proof for (4) is August Ames. Proof for (6) is how Asians are disadvantaged in college applications even more than whites are.
This is why I refer to troons and blacks as 'sacred classes' and homosexuals and women merely as semi-sacred classes.
Women are ranked far too low.
"sex workers" are human garbage. That story doesn't prove shit.
4 and 2 both defer to them, look who leads their organizations.
They are both above and below transgenders, depending on the situation.
It's : Women (sometimes) > transgenders > women (when they want to play oppressed) > blacks > other non-whites that vote for women's agenda > gays > Asian and white men.
Very dependent on context. There are plenty of times where a woman is raped, killed, or otherwise abused by the aforementioned troons or nonwhites, and the female victims are ignored or blamed to protect the perpetrators.
I will say I think women do now outrank gays in most situations, so I'll give you one bump to women's hierarchy of AoV's list. But I think for the most part it's accurate, as far as women's ranking goes.
Again, it's context sensitive though. There will be times where women certainly outrank nonwhites, but I don't think it's as common, and certainly not as common as it once was.
Women as a class are top, not individuals. What serves female supremacy is to ensure their political aims are achieved, and they do this by following the narrative in lockstep. If a few women end up on the wrong side, that isn't important.
Crucial aims of the More Feminine Way :
Men never find out the true goal of feminism.
Men never unite across any divisions against women (This is why they constantly divide, on any metric they can get. Female in group bias keeps them together, so it's an advantage if they keep us infighting)
Boys come out of the schools as broken as possible and unable to mentally resist control of the More Feminine Way
Every avenue of harming males must be kept open
Every tragedy is an opportunity to shift the Overton window towards male genocide.
The easiest way to explain it is, they will throw their own under the bus for later benefit or if it helps harm men.
I never expected the guy who thinks that women control literally everything to say that.
It was homosexual 'sex workers' that bullied to death a female 'sex worker'. Sex workers are present on both sides of the equation, which we can cancel out, and what remains is that homosexuals are superior to women.
Nope, as you can also see by the number of white women who are vilified for having an interaction with a black guy. Like the Central Park woman with the dog.
When are they ever above troons?