“Authoritative sources” are the primary means of controlling the narrative. A black guy can mow down a crowd of peas while shouting “I’m doing this because I hate white people” and you won’t be able to mention that on Wikipedia even though you have the video. No “authoritative source” will mention it
Many IT companies want parity, and will make it easier for women to be employed or promoted than males. That they don't have parity represents how many women don't want to enter the industry.
easy fix, have half the IT male nerds identify. Get into line, every 2nd code monkey is now women
edit: in fact this trooning stuff is a godsend, we just have to lose the shame and start doing it
I'm sure with the high levels of autism needed to edit a wikipedia article they could groom enough of them to identify as women to get those numbers way up.
A professor at University of Washington (Stuart Reges) in my state got lambasted for saying something just like this. Basically stating that the reason there are fewer women in computer science is because not many women are interested in it rather than that its because of sexism. He's absolutely right but all the SJWs were reeeing about how wrong he was...without backing up their claims with any valid evidence of course.
“Authoritative sources” are the primary means of controlling the narrative. A black guy can mow down a crowd of peas while shouting “I’m doing this because I hate white people” and you won’t be able to mention that on Wikipedia even though you have the video. No “authoritative source” will mention it
Don't forget the only "authoritative sources" are generally mainstream media, and even fox isn't considered authoritative"
Only Al Jazeera, or the Saudi Funded ‘Independent’ count as ‘authoritative’
Even if you had a source, like a document straight from the Navy, you'd still be denied. They only allow news reports of events, not primary records.
It was 90% in 2013 when it was still pretty organic.
wouldn't be surprised if the 3% swing were trannies.
I guarantee it.
Go look in compsci classes to day. Trannies outnumber women.
just have a look at
most of the people there are men. and why fucking not?
these people have a sick definition of justice
Many IT companies want parity, and will make it easier for women to be employed or promoted than males. That they don't have parity represents how many women don't want to enter the industry.
easy fix, have half the IT male nerds identify. Get into line, every 2nd code monkey is now women edit: in fact this trooning stuff is a godsend, we just have to lose the shame and start doing it
kek
I'm sure with the high levels of autism needed to edit a wikipedia article they could groom enough of them to identify as women to get those numbers way up.
I’ve just about given up trying to explain this logic to people who instinctively demand representation in everything
maybe because women are not that interest in technical stuff or technical information in general? or maybe not interested in history??
pretty much information is BORING to most women. chemistry, engineer, history, biology, and etc.
A professor at University of Washington (Stuart Reges) in my state got lambasted for saying something just like this. Basically stating that the reason there are fewer women in computer science is because not many women are interested in it rather than that its because of sexism. He's absolutely right but all the SJWs were reeeing about how wrong he was...without backing up their claims with any valid evidence of course.
like only 5 people edit wiki. many start and give up because their edits get undone
Complaints about diversity arent legitimate.