The dude clearly did not think this thru, how could he not have realized how badly this could blow up in his face.
Him saying he is the true victim because someone said the n-word to him was brain farts.
That's a total non sequitur. Anything the Dems say that demonstrates that they hate Clarence Thomas because he's a black conservative will necessarily be free speech. It's still evidence regardless.
Jesus, did these retards get themselves so confused that they thought that because their line is always: free speech is not hate speech, that if someone used free speech, it can't have been hate speech?
While it may look bad I'm at the stage where I think we should very rarely reply to their questions. When they ask they don't ask in the name of truthfulness, they ask in the name of wasting your time and energy. We've all seen it before, where someone responds and proves their point in the clearest way possible, then the left ignores the proof, and moves the goal posts. In short, it's a waste of time.
Unless the chairman of a government committee specifically called someone a nigger, that point is utterly irrelevant. It's absolutely infuriating that a certain type of black person always falls back on "muh n word" when challenged on any topic, in any situation.
The guy lost it, it was not about freedom of speech, he basically said that is ok to use racist speech because is legal. No where did the one speaking say it is illegal.
The guy just panicked and burped some leftism.
"He's not a victim of racism because he is an Uncle Tom. I AM THE REAL VICTIM HERE! Listen only to ME! Only people who agree with me can be victims!"
The dude clearly did not think this thru, how could he not have realized how badly this could blow up in his face. Him saying he is the true victim because someone said the n-word to him was brain farts.
"I'M THE VICTIM! I'M THE REAL BLACK MAN. NOT THOSE NIGGERS! THEY HAVE THE WHITE DEVIL INSIDE OF THEM! IT'S A FALSE RACE CONSCIOUSNESS!"
"Senator, that seems really offensive"
"SHUT THE FUCK UP SHIT-SKIN!"
I liked at the end when he asked if he wanted another example :)))
Yea that was funny.
That's a total non sequitur. Anything the Dems say that demonstrates that they hate Clarence Thomas because he's a black conservative will necessarily be free speech. It's still evidence regardless.
What a fucking disingenuous asshole.
Jesus, did these retards get themselves so confused that they thought that because their line is always: free speech is not hate speech, that if someone used free speech, it can't have been hate speech?
Well, I'm rather sure Thomas didn't vote for uncle sniffer. So, how black can he really be?
While it may look bad I'm at the stage where I think we should very rarely reply to their questions. When they ask they don't ask in the name of truthfulness, they ask in the name of wasting your time and energy. We've all seen it before, where someone responds and proves their point in the clearest way possible, then the left ignores the proof, and moves the goal posts. In short, it's a waste of time.
One may as well ask "what do you want to hear?" Or simply preface with "what could I tell you that would convince you?"
WeLl, He DoSeN’t HaVe FrEdOmE fRoM CoNsEqUeNcE!
Leftoids: "You just want freeze peach so you can call black men niggers!"
Leftoids, after calling a black man a slur: "It's free speech, bigot!"
Every fucking time.
"Wah, some people say nigger" frowny face
Unless the chairman of a government committee specifically called someone a nigger, that point is utterly irrelevant. It's absolutely infuriating that a certain type of black person always falls back on "muh n word" when challenged on any topic, in any situation.
Do they need another example?
"Uncle Tom" is worse racial slur than the N-word simply because it shames blacks for behaving like civilized humans.
You don't get to give another example after slam dunking like that, no.
And top kek at his response basically being 'lol grow up its just hurt fee-fees', as if that doesn't undermine decades of leftist arguments.
You dorks don't seem to grasp the clear distinction between racial hatred and free speech.
When TheWrongParty attacks someone with vile speech like "Uncle Tom" and "Ngger" -> Racial Hatred.
When TheSocJusParty does it -> Freedom of Speech.
The guy lost it, it was not about freedom of speech, he basically said that is ok to use racist speech because is legal. No where did the one speaking say it is illegal. The guy just panicked and burped some leftism.