At this point I am going to say that I hope they fully crush the comedian and his bloodthirsty regime composed of globalists and Banderites(Azov Battalion).
Between the globalists and Putin, I have no love at all for either of these two sides.
I hope both of them are ultimately crushed by the end.
The facts of the matter are that the globalists are the ones suffocating the west with authoritarianism.
Putin is suffocating his own country with authoritarianism.
Which one do you think matters more to people living in the west?
With how the globalists are constantly propagandizing about the comedian, it would be nice to see them seethe a bit when he and his entire regime falls.
The Ukraine flag is the new pronouns in bio and BLM fist and vaxxed on a Twitter profile.
Would be nice to see these virtue signallers seethe.
Of course I haven't forgotten that the Ukranian people are caught in the middle of two completely horrendous groups.
They will needlessly suffer for the follies of their government, globalists and Russia.
This perfectly summarizes my oppinion of the conflict.
This war could have been avoided with better leadership in Ukraine and the US as we would all rather pressure the Russian government to go to war with the PRC.
I already said that I feel sympathy for the Ukrainian people but what they are going through is a result of years of terrible decisions made by various corrupt groups: the corrupt globalists using Ukraine as a wedge against the corrupt Putin govt and also the corrupt regime in control of Ukraine playing along with the globalists.
No matter how corrupt globalists and Putin are, it doesn't change the principle that wars of aggression are generally wrong and should not be tolerated by a civil society. You, on the other hand, have no principles and are so nihilistic that your position is just the opposite of whatever the corporate media says (corrupt scum though they are). You're no different than the average woke cultist except in the rhetorical narrative you're fed, and evidently neither is most of this sub.
That is a harsh truth. Only losers can commit war crimes. Unfortunately for these Ukrainians, they are the ones most at risk for war crime prosecution.
Surrendered people aren't active combatants, and therefore are considered innocents and civilians. And you don't massacre civvies.
Unlike "Civilians" who are armed with molotovs and whatnot, who are actually active enemy combatants. Them, you can kill, so long as they don't drop their weapons and surrender.
You may hate it, and it was drafted by lawyers so you know, they're probably used to being hated, but the moment the Ukrainian government said on Twitter in a mass broadcast to all civvies to arm all the civvies with incendiaries, was the moment it was legal for Russia to kill them all. Much like EVERY SINGLE TIME IT HAPPENS, grandstanding on twitter is not a good idea when multiple legal issues are involved.
And that is why nobody takes conventions seriously.
The conventions are interpreted generously because they were never written to outlaw military necessity. But if you are declaring ahead of time your intention to commit a war crime, that's premeditated.
Is that what they're saying? I just took the tweet to me they're not going to hold back when attacking (if they really even were to begin with...it's propaganda all the way down).
Which is exactly what the tweet implies they will do. It says nothing about maiming or torturing. You're a mentally deranged, war criminal bootlicking lowlife.
This actually is a case of something being entirely false, but I don't know that it's him just being wrong, rather than spreading intentional disinformation.
Let me guess, the claim was made by Ukraine, right? Ukrainian claims are just as believable as Russian claims right now considering they're both fighting a war and will/have been using propaganda to support their side.
War Crimes are ok when there's a (D) in front of it..
At this point I am going to say that I hope they fully crush the comedian and his bloodthirsty regime composed of globalists and Banderites(Azov Battalion).
You're despicable scum, just like your puppetmaster Putin.
Between the globalists and Putin, I have no love at all for either of these two sides.
I hope both of them are ultimately crushed by the end.
The facts of the matter are that the globalists are the ones suffocating the west with authoritarianism.
Putin is suffocating his own country with authoritarianism.
Which one do you think matters more to people living in the west?
With how the globalists are constantly propagandizing about the comedian, it would be nice to see them seethe a bit when he and his entire regime falls.
The Ukraine flag is the new pronouns in bio and BLM fist and vaxxed on a Twitter profile.
Would be nice to see these virtue signallers seethe.
Of course I haven't forgotten that the Ukranian people are caught in the middle of two completely horrendous groups.
They will needlessly suffer for the follies of their government, globalists and Russia.
Yet this is what always happens in any war.
This perfectly summarizes my oppinion of the conflict.
This war could have been avoided with better leadership in Ukraine and the US as we would all rather pressure the Russian government to go to war with the PRC.
You are in a MSM induced hysteria.
I already said that I feel sympathy for the Ukrainian people but what they are going through is a result of years of terrible decisions made by various corrupt groups: the corrupt globalists using Ukraine as a wedge against the corrupt Putin govt and also the corrupt regime in control of Ukraine playing along with the globalists.
No matter how corrupt globalists and Putin are, it doesn't change the principle that wars of aggression are generally wrong and should not be tolerated by a civil society. You, on the other hand, have no principles and are so nihilistic that your position is just the opposite of whatever the corporate media says (corrupt scum though they are). You're no different than the average woke cultist except in the rhetorical narrative you're fed, and evidently neither is most of this sub.
They should call you noeyesnobrain for the retarded shit you just wrote.
My position is clear. Fuck Putin, Fuck the globalists and fuck the Zelensky/Banderite regime.
I want all of these scumbags to wipe each other out.
Stop trying to force people into your little boxes.
Let's be honest, the comedian isn't exactly clean in all of this. The Ukraine isn't free of corruption or a bastion of freedom.
Stop drooling in my direction, you braindead warmongering degenerate.
Civil society doesn’t exist the way you think it does,
Is this a Lindsey Graham alt account?
Lindsey Graham alt account confirmed. Thanks.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Wrong again
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
No, but really, stop being a dick to everyone.
War crimes are fine if my side does them.
That is a harsh truth. Only losers can commit war crimes. Unfortunately for these Ukrainians, they are the ones most at risk for war crime prosecution.
Helping.
Because this is all stupid propoganda.
Post Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
There's an argument there's a mistranslation, but this isn't spam.
What's the war crime? Killing invaders?
Declaring "No Prisoners!" is a war crime.
Surrendered people aren't active combatants, and therefore are considered innocents and civilians. And you don't massacre civvies.
Unlike "Civilians" who are armed with molotovs and whatnot, who are actually active enemy combatants. Them, you can kill, so long as they don't drop their weapons and surrender.
You may hate it, and it was drafted by lawyers so you know, they're probably used to being hated, but the moment the Ukrainian government said on Twitter in a mass broadcast to all civvies to arm all the civvies with incendiaries, was the moment it was legal for Russia to kill them all. Much like EVERY SINGLE TIME IT HAPPENS, grandstanding on twitter is not a good idea when multiple legal issues are involved.
Funny how the rules of war don’t actually apply when there really is a war.
The conventions are interpreted generously because they were never written to outlaw military necessity. But if you are declaring ahead of time your intention to commit a war crime, that's premeditated.
It's the same reason putting up "trespassers will be shot" signs is a real fucking bad idea even in stand your ground states.
Only if you lose.
No, it does not. If those artillery crews are preventing you carrying out the sabotage, they aren't surrendering.
Is that what they're saying? I just took the tweet to me they're not going to hold back when attacking (if they really even were to begin with...it's propaganda all the way down).
From the Hague Convention of 1907:
That convention hasn’t been followed since the day it was written.
FTFY, you cancerous tumour.
That's a "right" you forfeit when you wage a war of aggression.
Well if you did, it would send a message to other would be criminals.
Which is exactly what the tweet implies they will do. It says nothing about maiming or torturing. You're a mentally deranged, war criminal bootlicking lowlife.
lol making war is not in itself a war crime
I didn't say it was, you drooling Russian bootlicker.
lol
https://www.universalclass.com/i/course/reading-comprehension-101.htm
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
This actually is a case of something being entirely false, but I don't know that it's him just being wrong, rather than spreading intentional disinformation.
Let me guess, the claim was made by Ukraine, right? Ukrainian claims are just as believable as Russian claims right now considering they're both fighting a war and will/have been using propaganda to support their side.
From H.I. Sutton.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Removed: Actually it is a war crime. Rule 1