I find [the boy] is receiving mixed messages about the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine and that at 10 years of age he is unable to make an informed choice
Since the Nuremberg code can't be met, he can't get the jab.
Justice Van Melle noted the father complained “the government was forcing people to be vaccinated against COVID,” that “there is no benefit to children to receive the COVID vaccine” and that he wanted to “wait until further evidence is available regarding the safety of the vaccine.”
All true and reasonable.
“He shall not permit any other person to have any such discussion to make any suggestion to [his son] directly or indirectly,” said the Court. “He is prohibited from showing the child social media sites, websites, other online information, literature or any other material that calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines or to permit any other person to do so.”
Guess it's not surprising this judge doesn't believe in the Nuremberg code...
The Court also ordered that the father can take counsel only from a single approved medical professional when it comes to his son’s care, ruling that he “shall not involve any medical doctor other than Dr. Aaron Smith in this aspect of [the child’s] care.”
10 shots was the number I pinpointed in an old comment as necessary for a 1 in 10 myocarditis rate based on the rate of increase from shot to shot. Curious.
We estimated a risk of 95.4 cases of myopericarditis per million second doses administered in patients age 12-39 which is higher than the incidence reported to US advisory committees
95.4 per 1,000,000
9.54 per 100,000
0.954 per 10,000
My math is slightly off, but if this study is right, I'm not far off at all with my 1 in 10,000 estimate after two, which means the study is correct, which means after 10 doses, something around 20% of young men will have a ticking time bomb for a heart.
And if they’re from a 3rd world country, it will be given to them in a prophylactic manner since it’s assumed they have some type of parasitic infection.
Also, hey man! How are you doing? How’s your Friday?
"The order follows a December 23 ruling by a Québec Superior Court judge who suspended weekend visitation rights to prevent an unvaccinated father from seeing his fully vaccinated 12-year-old son. “The best interests of the child must guide the Court,” wrote Justice Sebastien Vaillancourt of Montréal.
“The child is vaccinated so he has some protection against the virus,” wrote Justice Vaillancourt. “Is this enough to allow him to rub shoulders with his father? The Court finds this is not the case.”"
This should hopefully put an end to Canadians bragging about free speech on the internet. “We have the same rights as you Americans, just with no violence. We’re Canadian nice!”
Canadians (like me) who frequent this site certainly can't claim any semblance of free speech in Canada. We have freedom of expression according to our Charter, but it's been interpreted into impotence by our legions of activist judges.
More accurate to say the PM shit himself and gave in to try and save himself. If the opposite had been the better option you can bet he'd do that instead.
Apparently only ~100,000 Canucks live north of that line, which is substantially lower than the number of Australians that live north of the crocodile line (yes, that exists), in a country (i.e. Canada) that is twice the size, and has 1.5 times the population…
I did not know this. In a sense, though, it’s perfect, because humans clearly were not meant to live in groups as large as we do, mostly, now…
I think history largely proves that, unfortunately… 🤷🏻♂️
The dad should just flee the country with the son the second she turns her back on the kid.
Once he gets to eastern europe, he can declare refugee status as his son is vulnerable to child abuse due to government backed medical fraud, and that he himself is vulnerable to abuse by the government because of this.
Since the Nuremberg code can't be met, he can't get the jab.
All true and reasonable.
Guess it's not surprising this judge doesn't believe in the Nuremberg code...
Getting a 2nd opinion is now illegal in Canada
Well that’s terrifying…
I’m genuinely shook by this. Possibly the most demented thing I’ve seen for a while, and that’s saying something… 😳
🤡🌏
😞
As I said before, I don't hate all women, I just distrust them. I hate the ones that prove me right.
Women are too weak for loyalty. They just do whatever the strongest tells them to
10 shots was the number I pinpointed in an old comment as necessary for a 1 in 10 myocarditis rate based on the rate of increase from shot to shot. Curious.
Do you mean 9 in 10?
1 in 10 of all vaccinated males, it's skewed by the older generations because of data limitations.
I'd guess it would be around 25-35% of the young men.
Found a comment where I mention it. 1 in 4.5 in young men.
https://patriots.win/p/141EnBugym/x/c/4JKyaSzcqLh
Turns out the reports of myocarditis in young men are being vastly UNDER-REPORTED because some facilities aren't properly labeling it for young men who are treated for it: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.21.21268209v1
95.4 per 1,000,000
9.54 per 100,000
0.954 per 10,000
My math is slightly off, but if this study is right, I'm not far off at all with my 1 in 10,000 estimate after two, which means the study is correct, which means after 10 doses, something around 20% of young men will have a ticking time bomb for a heart.
More Feminine Way indeed.
You aren't accounting for all the refugees Trudeau is going to import over the same time frame.
Here in America, refugees are not required to be jabbed.
They are required to take Ivermectin.
This is false.
They are required to take it if they have symptoms of a parasitic infection.
What if they are symptoms of a parasitic infection?
What if they are a parasitic infection?
And if they’re from a 3rd world country, it will be given to them in a prophylactic manner since it’s assumed they have some type of parasitic infection.
Also, hey man! How are you doing? How’s your Friday?
"The order follows a December 23 ruling by a Québec Superior Court judge who suspended weekend visitation rights to prevent an unvaccinated father from seeing his fully vaccinated 12-year-old son. “The best interests of the child must guide the Court,” wrote Justice Sebastien Vaillancourt of Montréal.
“The child is vaccinated so he has some protection against the virus,” wrote Justice Vaillancourt. “Is this enough to allow him to rub shoulders with his father? The Court finds this is not the case.”"
There are some whacky judges in canada.
Bro what the fuck
Quebec
This should hopefully put an end to Canadians bragging about free speech on the internet. “We have the same rights as you Americans, just with no violence. We’re Canadian nice!”
Canadians (like me) who frequent this site certainly can't claim any semblance of free speech in Canada. We have freedom of expression according to our Charter, but it's been interpreted into impotence by our legions of activist judges.
They'd just say that "spreading misinformation" isn't a right or something cucked like that.
What the fuck is it with Canada (and Auzzieland and New Shire)? Even the UK just shit themselves and gave in.
More accurate to say the PM shit himself and gave in to try and save himself. If the opposite had been the better option you can bet he'd do that instead.
Anglos Saxons lost a war against an enemy they never knew they were fighting.
This is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever heard. They have no right to tell a father he can’t share his opinion with his son.
Rights only extend as far as there is willingness to use violence to secure them.
The critical error of most western populations is believing that they can outsource that violence to the government.
It will not end without a bloody revolt, stop pretending there’s a political solution. Pick the neighbors you need too kill.
This makes me want to revolt.
caring about a 10 year old "making an informed choice" is priming the public for pedophilia
The other part of the "great" reset...
We'll teach your kids what we want, and you'll be happy about it.
Can we just... get a big saw and slice everything east of Manitoba off and just leave it to ruin?
I’m fairly sure I’ve seen posts here that indicate Manitoba and Alberta are equally fucked, and if that is the case, you can bet BC is, too…
What does that leave? The fucking Yukon, and Northwest Territories..??
Obliterate Canada south of the permafrost line. There’s your solution… /s 🤷🏻♂️
Apparently only ~100,000 Canucks live north of that line, which is substantially lower than the number of Australians that live north of the crocodile line (yes, that exists), in a country (i.e. Canada) that is twice the size, and has 1.5 times the population…
I did not know this. In a sense, though, it’s perfect, because humans clearly were not meant to live in groups as large as we do, mostly, now…
I think history largely proves that, unfortunately… 🤷🏻♂️
Preventing people from questioning it's safety and efficacy immediately calls into question it's safety and efficacy.
Does Canada have citizen arrest, because I think your government just questioned the Science (TM) (R)?
The dad should just flee the country with the son the second she turns her back on the kid.
Once he gets to eastern europe, he can declare refugee status as his son is vulnerable to child abuse due to government backed medical fraud, and that he himself is vulnerable to abuse by the government because of this.