Young dems have been raised on a diet of agitprop and fearmongering. They have been conditioned to believe they are going to be mass slaughtered by you. They have been conditioned to believe your existence is violence. They are dogs in cages being associated with your look and scent while their handlers electrocute them.
Nearly a quarter of college students wouldn't be friends with someone who voted for the other presidential candidate — with Democrats far more likely to dismiss people than Republicans — according to new Generation Lab/Axios polling.
71% of Democrats wouldn't go on a date with someone with opposing views, versus 31% of Republicans.
. . .
30% of Democrats — and 7% of Republicans — wouldn't work for someone who voted differently from them.
. . .
Women are more likely than men to take a strong partisan stance in their personal choices.
41% of women would go on a date with someone who voted for the opposing candidate, compared to 67% of men.
76% of women would work for someone who voted for the other candidate, vs. 86% of men.
Just 68% of women — compared to 84% of men — would shop at or support the business of someone of the other party.
The levels of polarization are off the charts and I don't really see them getting any better anytime soon. And it's mainly one way too; it'd seem that leftists would rather die than be associated with someone further to the right than them. This certainly bears out where I live. I expect to see the above stats for non-leftists go up in the coming years. It's the rare person who can avoid treating others as they're treated.
It's the politics of repressive tolerance, straight from the Marxist (Marcuse) handbook. Leftists are systematically excising political and cultural enemies from every institution and space under leftist control. The only solution to this behavior is the construction of parallel institutions, properly gatekept against leftism, and then eventually made to outcompe the alternative leftist society. Odds are high that secession is the only remotely peaceful outcome.
It's worse in the US because there is actually partisan disagreement over real issues in the US. The populist takeover of the GOP means that there is actually a genuine anti-establishment voice in American politics, unlike everywhere else in the Western world.
Populists and nationalists comprise the GOP voter base. The party itself is still overwhelmingly RINO and/or neocon, and this includes nearly all mainstream messaging. Trump carries 90%+ approval rating among republican voters, but the percentage of republican officials either betraying or trying to "move past" Trump is probably also 90%.
It's anecdotal and skewed, but skimming through comments on stuff like Economics Explained's recent video about whether not Brexit would be 'as bad as we thought' -
If those are reflective of young UK leftists, it's at least simmering-under-the-surface bad. General disdain, an assumed stance that the brexiteers are all children of caveman like intelligence who enjoy chaos, are stupid, had no idea what they're doing, blablabla, and basically what Impossible1 is saying - they're waiting for the stupid old racist people to die so their Inevitable and Virtuous belief system wins by default and they can restore rationality to the world.
There were a few stubborn folks offering counterpoints but they were getting either ignored or shoved aside via downvotes.
It was... depressing. Not surprising, but they are just lost, wandering around talking only among themselves and being pretty spiteful. But what else can you expect from trendy, globalist friendly economics commentary on youtube?
Reminds me of Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clark. Alien outsiders impose an artificial utopia on the whole planet. The end result? Total erasure of human cultures and individual identities followed by indoctrinated children siding with the invaders. Oh, and the invaders end up looking exactly like the demons of Christianity. It's an almost perfect allegory for globalism.
So, does the book portray that as good or not? Reading about it seems to indicate yes, but I wouldn't know since I haven't read it. I can't imagine the sort of worldview someone has to have to think the ending's positive.
White liberals in general demonstrate out-group racial bias. They are the only racial cohort in history to behave this way. Probably because out-group bias is literally dysgenic.
Young dems have been raised on a diet of agitprop and fearmongering. They have been conditioned to believe they are going to be mass slaughtered by you. They have been conditioned to believe your existence is violence. They are dogs in cages being associated with your look and scent while their handlers electrocute them.
That's how I feel about them too though.
Yeah... they openly want to kill you because of your gender or skin color and culture.
difference is you're actually right
MK_Ultra is a resounding success.
FTA:
Nearly a quarter of college students wouldn't be friends with someone who voted for the other presidential candidate — with Democrats far more likely to dismiss people than Republicans — according to new Generation Lab/Axios polling.
71% of Democrats wouldn't go on a date with someone with opposing views, versus 31% of Republicans.
. . .
30% of Democrats — and 7% of Republicans — wouldn't work for someone who voted differently from them.
. . .
Women are more likely than men to take a strong partisan stance in their personal choices.
41% of women would go on a date with someone who voted for the opposing candidate, compared to 67% of men.
76% of women would work for someone who voted for the other candidate, vs. 86% of men.
Just 68% of women — compared to 84% of men — would shop at or support the business of someone of the other party.
The levels of polarization are off the charts and I don't really see them getting any better anytime soon. And it's mainly one way too; it'd seem that leftists would rather die than be associated with someone further to the right than them. This certainly bears out where I live. I expect to see the above stats for non-leftists go up in the coming years. It's the rare person who can avoid treating others as they're treated.
Democrats: "This just proves Republicans are evil and they know it!"
It's the politics of repressive tolerance, straight from the Marxist (Marcuse) handbook. Leftists are systematically excising political and cultural enemies from every institution and space under leftist control. The only solution to this behavior is the construction of parallel institutions, properly gatekept against leftism, and then eventually made to outcompe the alternative leftist society. Odds are high that secession is the only remotely peaceful outcome.
Those 59% of women are lying too. If a chad with money voted Republican, they would still spread their legs as fast as humanly possible.
I don't think it's this bad anywhere else in the world, although leftists being more intolerant is the norm.
It's worse in the US because there is actually partisan disagreement over real issues in the US. The populist takeover of the GOP means that there is actually a genuine anti-establishment voice in American politics, unlike everywhere else in the Western world.
Populists and nationalists comprise the GOP voter base. The party itself is still overwhelmingly RINO and/or neocon, and this includes nearly all mainstream messaging. Trump carries 90%+ approval rating among republican voters, but the percentage of republican officials either betraying or trying to "move past" Trump is probably also 90%.
I'd say the rest of the Anglosphere is worse. Shit, Australia is currently putting people into concentration camps and the masses seem to applaud it.
Actually, it's less bad in the UK. There was a poll touching on this exactly - but it wasn't of students.
It's anecdotal and skewed, but skimming through comments on stuff like Economics Explained's recent video about whether not Brexit would be 'as bad as we thought' -
If those are reflective of young UK leftists, it's at least simmering-under-the-surface bad. General disdain, an assumed stance that the brexiteers are all children of caveman like intelligence who enjoy chaos, are stupid, had no idea what they're doing, blablabla, and basically what Impossible1 is saying - they're waiting for the stupid old racist people to die so their Inevitable and Virtuous belief system wins by default and they can restore rationality to the world.
There were a few stubborn folks offering counterpoints but they were getting either ignored or shoved aside via downvotes.
It was... depressing. Not surprising, but they are just lost, wandering around talking only among themselves and being pretty spiteful. But what else can you expect from trendy, globalist friendly economics commentary on youtube?
Reminds me of Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clark. Alien outsiders impose an artificial utopia on the whole planet. The end result? Total erasure of human cultures and individual identities followed by indoctrinated children siding with the invaders. Oh, and the invaders end up looking exactly like the demons of Christianity. It's an almost perfect allegory for globalism.
So, does the book portray that as good or not? Reading about it seems to indicate yes, but I wouldn't know since I haven't read it. I can't imagine the sort of worldview someone has to have to think the ending's positive.
Not exactly uncommon unfortunately. I've seen that far more in the US.
Its like gays and religion. At worse, christians will say mean words and condemn gay people to hell. While islam still executes gays..
But christianity is apparently the problem lol.
I'm not sure about the young part I remember seeing a graph showing it was white leftists in general with the negative self-preference.
White liberals in general demonstrate out-group racial bias. They are the only racial cohort in history to behave this way. Probably because out-group bias is literally dysgenic.