Australia admits it is banning ivermectin for COVID because it interferes with universal vaccine agenda
(www.yourdestinationnow.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
FTA: "Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community."
I actually believe that the ineffective vaccines have been doing precisely what they claim Ivermectin will do. People who have gotten the injections have a false sense of security from the false belief that they are immune. The result of that is that they have actually become super-spreaders.
Therefore, we should ban these ineffective vaccines...
"Leaky" vaccines are a nightmare scenario that we're living out in real time.
Jackpot. I've been thinking this since the vaccine rollout really started gaining speed. Vaccinated people are, what, 50-60% less likely to get infected according to the stats I'm seeing? But anecdotally speaking they're about 1000% more likely to get in my personal physical space and bumble around without a care, compared to this time last year. The vaccines have given these people a magic talisman against the virus in their minds. The MSM encourages them to ignore any doubts regarding the vaccines and to feel good about themselves for not listening to the nasty Ivermectin cultists - they did everything they were asked to do by the new authoritarian moral order, so it's life as normal for them now, nothing to worry about.
I as a cautious unvaccinated individual am presenting way less of an infection risk than the average vaccinated person I encounter out in public these days.
Although to be fair, unless you're very old or morbidly obese, your danger of being hospitalized or dying from COVID is still pretty low.
banning lifesaving treatment so that the only option is a preventative treatment that is not 100% effective. This has to violate some sort of international law.
I don’t think international law really matters anymore.
It never really did. It's only has relevancy if people in state power want to prosecute other people who were in power within said state. It's not like the UN can just arrive into Aus and take the law breaches to The Hauge.
As sad as it is, this really is why so often the judges and lawmakers always do is because when they all just decide to take away our rights... everyone just goes "oh ok" and moves on and never demands that it be changed.
I mean that is why the gun rights are so important, not just for hunting and whatever [I know I am just preaching to the choir here] but because it is a threat to an oppressive government. Problem is, it really isn't anymore because no one has a backbone to actually stand up and care when their rights are trickled away, or if someone does do something, he just gets condemned as a terrorist and everyone considers hime vil. Look I would prefer no violence myself but that is literally the point of gun rights to be a threat to a government that oppresses.
"Our bois can't make money off it, so get fucked, sorry to hear."
If the government told Australians to literally go hang themselves with nooses, they'd probably do it, is what it sounds like.
You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it!
People should save and share this anytime someone spouts the MSM's nonsense about it not working.