Australia admits it is banning ivermectin for COVID because it interferes with universal vaccine agenda
(www.yourdestinationnow.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
banning lifesaving treatment so that the only option is a preventative treatment that is not 100% effective. This has to violate some sort of international law.
I don’t think international law really matters anymore.
It never really did. It's only has relevancy if people in state power want to prosecute other people who were in power within said state. It's not like the UN can just arrive into Aus and take the law breaches to The Hauge.
As sad as it is, this really is why so often the judges and lawmakers always do is because when they all just decide to take away our rights... everyone just goes "oh ok" and moves on and never demands that it be changed.
I mean that is why the gun rights are so important, not just for hunting and whatever [I know I am just preaching to the choir here] but because it is a threat to an oppressive government. Problem is, it really isn't anymore because no one has a backbone to actually stand up and care when their rights are trickled away, or if someone does do something, he just gets condemned as a terrorist and everyone considers hime vil. Look I would prefer no violence myself but that is literally the point of gun rights to be a threat to a government that oppresses.