According to BS social justice metrics, the least racist country in Europe is ...checks notes... Serbia
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
CIA propaganda outlet says what?
I've been genuinely weirded out how often Radio Free Europe has covered issues better than the Corporate Media, and with less bias.
It's really creepy.
It makes me wonder just completely controlled the American Media is when the actual intelligence apparatus doesn't seem to be nearly as pozzed as it's brass.
I mean, if Radio Free Europe started reporting on the American voting audits, I'd have to assume there was a dark civil war taking place in the security state; and I'm not convinced that isn't the case. Clearly: not all the government agencies are on the same page.
Next level Orwellian, the official state sponsored propaganda acts against the state as the sole source of truth. Everyone ignores it because it's official state sponsored propaganda.
A country where live mines outnumber people by about a hundred to one.
You misspelled Bosnia.
They were all fighting each other anyway.
And they obviously controlled for whether blacks are more relatively likely to commit crimes than whites, right? Or whether people were more likely to have lost their jobs or their place in college due to affirmative action policies favoring blacks, versus policies favoring whites? Or whether there had been recent social movements focused on black lives mattering more than whites, versus movements saying the opposite?
And they also checked and wrote as many disparaging articles about the same data concerning negative impressions of whites held by blacks, right?
And this certainly isn't an entire project created by a bunch of agenda-driven assholes who had already reached a conclusion before they even did the research, as made obvious by calling it "Project Implicit", right?
Dropping the sarcasm, this is a bunch of black supremacist assholes working back from their already-set conclusion to justify their hatred of whites. They don't care about whether there could be fair reasons for why people might feel less positive about blacks, because in their world, black people are perfect. They don't care that their own implicit dislike for whites is, ironically, crystal clear, because they think having a negative bias towards whites is justified and virtuous, even while they've dedicated their lives to the idea that having a negative bias towards blacks is unjustifiable and tremendously shameful.
And finally, this isn't even measuring actual actions. This isn't saying, "These people wouldn't hire a black person even if he were more qualified for the job". It's just "implicit bias", and I guarantee this is measured in the same sociology bullshit ways they always measure these things when they want the data to be shocking. Like when they wanted to be able to say video games made people violent, and they did it by having two groups fill in word problems, like EXPLO_E, and if you fill it in with a D you're violent, and if you fill it in with an R you're not. Because sociology has always been about getting the results you want to justify what you already believe.
Just because they don't hate black people, doesn't mean they aren't racist. Ask the Serbs about their neighbors.
Our neighbors are of the same race.
Depending on who you ask "Asian" is one race. That doesn't stop the Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans (not to mention other groups in SE Asia) from despising each other in racial terms so intense that no one in North America outside the BLM lunatics could begin to understand it.
Does the study also poll what light skin is thought as? The big "melanin is associated with empathy" push by racists is likely far more spread than people think.
It's also demonstrably false. Violent black and brown crime is the exact opposite of empathy. That's why people who witness it first hand are always saying "I can't imagine ever doing that to another person".
This is not to say that other racial demos don't commit violent crime, but no one with any cultural influence is claiming white or Asian people are uniquely empathetic.
Now do it in Africa.
Test cancelled due to genocide
It says so in the image. The nonsensical 'implicit association test'.
I wonder what you'd get if you compared this map to a map of average skin tone.
The Czech Republic is a weird case, it is one of the most atheist nations on Earth yet also one of the most racist. Same with Japan...
This image is pure bunk. Also, it makes sense that you would be more racist if you are atheist. If you don't have a religion to tell you that all men are brothers, and that there is no Jew or Greek in Christ, then you can fall back on other forms of tribalism, including race.
Having a strong grip on reality will always make you look 'racist'.
Bless you my friend.
Today's definition of racism: associating dark skin with negative thoughts.
Why is 0.350 the middle point for this measure? Things like this are usually on a scale of 0.000 to 1.000, so does 0.500 mean "ambivalent/don't care" and if so does that mean that even the worst country viewed blacks slightly favourably? What do the numbers mean?
brb moving to belarus
Dark sin is not the same as Africans. A lot of the east europeans have a bad although realistic opinion of gypsies.
I took a look. Project Implicit uses the pseudoscience known as the implicit Association Test. The map indicates nothing.
That is the point.
Serbia is the least racist country only when all non-serbs have already been removed from the world.