Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

98
J&J vaccine causes paralysis that 'typically is temporary'. (www.tampabay.com)
posted 4 years ago by Steampunk_Moustache 4 years ago by Steampunk_Moustache +98 / -0
39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 54 ▼
– CIAMM 54 points 4 years ago +54 / -0

Yes, I'd like to sign up for the paralysis please. You know, the one that's supposed to be temporary, usually?

DARWIN AWARD

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MAGAnic316 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

“TYPICALLY temporary”.

Which in and of itself suggests it isn’t rare at all, but occurs with enough frequency to be considered “typical”.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 43 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache [S] 43 points 4 years ago +43 / -0

Just fucking wait. I can't shake the feeling that these vaccines are gonna be a ticking timebomb of serious conditions 10, 20 years down the line.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– Galean 23 points 4 years ago +23 / -0

If there is going to be it will be either minimalized as better then have 700 billion people die of the china flue or say it is not in any way related and just bury any questions with the right wing conspiracy cudgel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– CIAMM 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

Serious problem for the unjabbed long before that? They're trying for that, anyway

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

The only serious problems we're going to have are draconian policies implemented to treat us all as second class citizens.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– CIAMM 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I can hope you're right. History demonstrates that it's only a matter of time before the mindless horde in the street is armed with machine guns and RPGs. In that context thinking that the unvaxxed should die becomes a sidebar issue.

The virus will have evolutionary pressure to become more deadly as it lives in the vaxxed. This is bad news for us, similar to Mareck's syndrome among chickens. Keeping our immune system strong and staying active and fit will hopefully continue to be enough. Getting HCQ (and azithromycin) through America's Front Line Doctors would be good, has that been restored?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– Grumman 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

even the unvaxed are at risk by simply being near the vaxed.

No they aren't, the author made that up. Check the journal article they're citing as evidence for this claim - there is no mention of this being true.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– graucho 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

You're kidding, right? SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated. It's a computer generated model based on 8 base pairs out of ~30, 000. The whole fucking narrative is fake.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– ApexVeritas 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

There's been a shit ton of first hand accounts of people's health being negatively affected just by being near vaccinated people. There were a lot of posts about it in conspiracies.win a few months back.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– throwawayaccount2037 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Actually.. Pfizer mentioned it was true.

It's in their document. Even if you don't get the jab they note that there could be side-effects of people around those who did get the jab.

They briefly cover this on page 67 of their document: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy: • A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred

Given some accounts of this being reported by people who were not vaccinated but around people who were and incurred heavy bleeding, etc., and the fact that Pfizer warns of possible exposure due to inhalation or skin contact warrants further investigation.

Unfortunately, we will never have that proper investigation before the adverse side effects are manifested.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Grumman 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Pfizer mentioned it was true.

No they didn't. Read the title: this is the protocol for conducting the study. Asking the question does not mean the answer is "Yes."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– throwawayaccount2037 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

No they didn't. Read the title: this is the protocol for conducting the study. Asking the question does not mean the answer is "Yes."

This is the protocol for the three phase trial after they conducted preliminary pre-trial testing, where they outlined some of the issues they observed for selection.

One of those issues was spontaneous abortions, hence why they have an entire section dedicated to it in the guideline.

In fact, they only mention in the guideline certain scenarios that were discovered or reported during the pre-trials. Nevertheless their observation of some effects from inhalation or skin contact warranted mention in the guideline.

This was also something that was observed by people like Naomi Wolfe, who was banned from social media and censored for spreading the news that unvaccinated women who were around those who were vaccinated experienced heavy bleeding. This led the Left to demonize her as a crazy conspiracy theorists: https://archive.is/wip/3wLr0

However, the more research being done into it seems to fit in line with Pfizer's own guidelines and the anecdotes of these women.

Another article also covered it from a completely different health professional who also observed these cases in women who were unvaccinated as well: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2021/04/bizarre-phenomenon-unvaccinated-getting-sick-being-around-the-covid-vaxxed.html

That's not to mention that the Chinese and Bill Gates have already talked about "immunizing" vaccine-resistant individuals via shedding: https://greatgameindia.com/covid-19-vaccine-shedding/

Someone in the comment section asked a good question, a James Boy: How do we know that shedding isn't already part of the current vaccine batch?

We know the spike protein can travel through the bloodstream based on another study recently done, which explains why it can cause blood clots and neurological issues to the ACE2 receptors: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/

I'm not entirely sure why you're so averse to people coming to this conclusion based on statements made in Pfizer's own documents, testimony by thousands of other people, and additional reports that seem to be pointing to the same thing.

If you have some recent, independent data studies to point to that say otherwise, feel free to share them. But so far all of the mainstream media, Big Tech and Big Pharma talking points is "nuh uh, the vaccines are fine. Just trust us".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MGTAU 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

My personal experience is that I have zero issues being around tons of vax people and being unvax and never even having covid ever.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– throwawayaccount2037 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Actually... you're right. There was a Facebook group of women who had extreme bleeding (the group was banned by Facebook) and they didn't even get the jab. They just lived with people who did.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– krzyzowiec 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

But it will guarantee loads of patients for the medical doctors to treat. It's guaranteed income for the hospital and pharmaceutical systems.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Star_Commander 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

"No evidence of relation to the vaccine, sorry"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– FrostedCricketFlakes 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

You might have to learn to walk again, so it's not like it's permanent. At most, it's just a minor inconvenience.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Jimmyjetfuel 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

If You get a droopy face, that means it's working!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– KekistanPM 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

That just means it's working!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– graucho 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12jJilPQ7o/dogs-are-smarter-than-humans/c/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

A cute video, but those dogs are clearly trick-trained. No dog just holds treats in their mouth for no reason.

Those dogs are exactly as smart as humans: They're doing exactly as they are told, despite it not being beneficial to them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– graucho 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SaltySavage 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Lol! Perfectly put.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– deleted 24 points 4 years ago +24 / -0
▲ 22 ▼
– Galean 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

Which means no one will give a crap. The only time we've seen any skepticism allowed was when it affected women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 25 ▼
– deleted 25 points 4 years ago +25 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Wait, wait, wait! ...Has the men dying inconvenienced the women in some way?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– hazelnfilbert 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

This is exactly what happened to my dad's cooworker. 2 weeks post J+J, paralysis in one arm and legs. He still can barely walk and has no feeling in one arm and his torso. Can't feel hunger, urinate on his own, walk without assistance...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– krzyzowiec 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Fuck, wow. Literally a life changing experience. All to avoid a mild flu? As much as that person deserved it for jabbing himself, I can't help but feel terrible about what has happened to him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– hazelnfilbert 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I feel both pity and frustration. Their employer is pushing it, yes. But my dad also gave his friend information about the dangers/known risks of it and encouraged him to hold off and learn more. My dad was out for a week, comes back and his buddy got the jab. 😖

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy