Trudeau Government Unable to Define the Term "Woman"
(thepostmillennial.com)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Define Woman: Justin Trudeau.
Call to all men to ID as a woman to receive benefits otherwise unavailable to you as a man.
I'll help!
HOLDS UP PICTURE OF JUSTIN TRUDEAU
That's funny, based on my impression of Trudeau, I'd figure they'd have a harder time defining what a man is.
Some organization called "Canadian Women's Sex-Based Rights?" That's gotta be against the narrative now. You can't give rights to women or sex-based. It's a fluid spectrum or whatever right?
Either that, or it's an organization where Canadian women's rights are based on how much they sell sex. Which would be more consistent with the OnlyFans culture of today.
They also picture a bearded woman in the article and explicitly define woman in the first word of the headline, so I guess they really can define woman.
You know.. sooner or later 95% of us will be under woke-ism. Just look at north korea. After years of propaganda, almost all people worship dear leader or afraid to go against.
Itll happen in the US and the West. Dont think that it wont. Sky is red. Up is down. Boys have vaginas and girls have penises... etc etc.
Is that what we call that particular group now...?
I apply the pornography definition when it comes to women: "I'll know it when I see it".
The ol' "dousing rod."
Exactly. This is why it cracks me up when they talk about women in certain fields. They can’t even define it.
I would make it "adult female human," just to be precise.
Yes. Otherwise, cows, ewes, sows, hens, does, and mares would fit the definition.
Don't forget bitches
I would expand that to "adult female humanoid" if there were any non-human humanoids to include. If elves existed, we'd probably still call them "elf men" and "elf women" and not "werelves" and "woelves."
We talk real world, elf supremacist
im_twenty.jpg
Careful of Rule 16, Impy. . . .
The best slave is the one who thinks he's free.
Americans for the past 100 years.
I’ve been pretty casually trying to push and see if I could violate rule 2. Unlike Reddit this place isn’t a death sentence simply for stating you mind, it’s when you exasperate and bring about an issue that the rule was in place for. For example I am a clearly open supporter of structured violence, simply put men need to be violent and receive violence to grow as a person and to understand why discipline is necessary. This technically breaks rule 2, but since I am not advocating that Jews need to be put in a gas chamber, how to do it, and handing people lists to order on Amazon, it tends to slide.
If words are violence like faggot leftists say, then I've just violated it.
Good thing there's no such thing as "trans", because it was invented by a pedophile, for pedophiles to use as cover.