Target puts a disclaimer on dads.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
More and more I realize how good I had it as someone born in 80. Up to early 2000s things were pretty good and there was great entertainment and I enjoyed picking up new books and comic books
Also from the 80's and have to agree, I am so glad I got out of the school system before all this garbage went into overdrive.
Am also glad I got introduced to 4chan at some point as all the shit I saw there really changed how I thought about things and helped me actually think about shit vs just going along with things.
I was born in the early 90s and feel very similarly to you. It was only after I became an adult that things seemed to really go off the rails.
The early days of the Internet were fucking awesome.
I am not sure what it is supposed to mean. I'd naively read it as "embrace your inner dad, buy our garbage for yourself as though you were a dad".
More like, “everyone’s a dad, forget having a day celebrating actual Father’s Day.”
That's exactly what it is. "The term dad is meaningless, fathers are unimportant, men should not get any recognition for anything ever. Consume product."
consume
Probably it means "single mothers are such heroes, being both your mother and your father, so buy her some of our crap".
Its so that all the jogger americans who grew up without a dad don't feel left out.
Lean forward.
Spoken by powerful, independent women. Now just listen as they repeat the exact words millions of other women say.
DAD; DAD'DLE, verb intransitive - "to walk with tottering (shaking), like a child or an old man".
Meanwhile; F'ATHER, noun [Latin pater.] - "he who begets a child; in Latin genitor or generator".
Once again; rhetorical wizards at play by suggesting death over life.
Dad
Origin
mid 16th century: perhaps imitative of a young child's first syllables da, da .
Quit making shit up.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/daddy
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/dad
Now question why the parasites suggest "dad" in advertising of manhood; while suggesting "daddy" in pornography? Coincidence?
If it's about origin...nature does not use words to communicate itself. We suggest words to each other in ignorance of nature; which communicates from flow to form (perceiving inspiration); while believing the suggested words (brands; idols) of others represents form to form in ignorance of flow.
We represent form within flow aka life moving from inception towards death; which implies constant change aka energy. What does form within flow implies for energy? Self segregation of potentiality (flow) into potential (form). This is why we are divided within momentum (form) and united within motion (flow).
In short...no coinkydink within form.
You sure like to copy paste dictionary entries like they somehow give meaning to your ramblings for someone who thinks words are made up in our "ignorance" of your ethereal and ill defined god "nature"
So ill defined you can't even decide if your bullshit is supposed to come from nature or some dimwitted idea of "all"
It's a catch-22 for ignorance...believe that your definition is correct and the contradiction of your consented to beliefs is shown; believe in the definition I quoted and I'm gonna contradict that with a nature that doesn't use words to communicate itself.
No matter what you choose; ignorance will be unmasked; because you acted upon wants over needs. This is when I point out that consent to suggestions by believing them is what is causing the conflict of reason (true vs false); which is in ignorance of flow.
When you read and try to judge if what you read is true or false, you're stuck within the conflict of reason, caused by consenting to a suggestion. You're being deceived to perceive your entire existence as being within conflicts, and you lack the comprehension about your beliefs causing them for you.
ALL represents predefined information; the ONEs within lack comprehension about what it means. We cannot define meaning; only build ONEs comprehension towards ALL perceived, which demands choice of adherence to ALL; not submission to believe the suggestions of other ONEs (aka the choice of ignorance towards ALL).
I only use the old dictionary entries to show a) the contradiction to what others believe; b) the rhetorical revisionism since then, and c) to put it into the perspective of natural law according to my potential (comprehension).
From my perspective this simply represents adaptation to inspiration and it immensely helps me to grow my comprehension; since I teach/learn myself while doing so. From the natural law perspective; I represent inspiration (need) and information (want) for others, which puts the responsibility of choice on them.
RAM'BLING, participle present tense - "roving; wandering; moving or going irregularly". a) irregular would imply not in accordance to natural law; but choice of ignorance is defined by natural law as needed for balance within motion so there's no regular vs irregular conflict; unless one chooses to believe it; b) roving: wandering; moving denotes flow; which proclaimed by us implies form within flow.
Therefore I ramble (move) in adherence to natural law as form within flow.
Where within nature are you taught words? What are words describing? What inspired one to describe it through words?
Words represent the transmutation of sound by ONE out of ALL. Sound represents the communication between flow and form aka the friction; vibration; resonance of the velocity of motion meeting the resistance of momentum.
This is what our choice of adherence would resonate with; while our choice of ignorance causes dissonance from.
E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Gr. to burn, to shine]. That denotes heat; from friction; vibration; resonance of flow meeting form aka internal communication (flow/form) of energy. The invisible aspect of ethereal represents ONEs lack of comprehension towards ALL perceived.
You're alive; which means your inception and your death are "invisible" to you; because you're moving in-between them aka you're within the temporary momentum of ongoing motion...in balance aka in response as form to flow aka responsible for adaptation by choice of action.
God represents a consented to false authority in ignorance of the sole authority over self (free will of choice) that was used to consent to the suggested false authority.
Nature (to be born) represents to be set into; which implies form within flow aka ONE within ALL; which (only) when comprehend implies ALL being ONE in energy aka the ONEsess of ALL. Comprehending the former represents gaining self discernment aka the balance between physical perception and mental comprehension; which establishes the comprehension of the laws of nature, which are needed as the foundation to build ONEs assumptions within ALL onto.
Nature (form within flow aka ONE)
ALL (flow/form within energy).
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] - from responding to flow.
My God kicked your gods ass.
You are a fool, a false teacher who teaches a hollow religion of the worship of self.
May God have mercy on your soul.
You perceive conflict (reason); I point out what caused it (consent to suggested belief).
FOOL, noun [Heb.] - "one who is destitute of reason, or the common powers of understanding". That's another suggested inversion...the choice to adhere to perception is what builds comprehension; believing others; which causes the conflict of reason, is what represents the choice of ignorance that causes the lack of comprehension.
I do not offer information; i adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self aka teach/learn self; which represents inspiration to those who choose to adhere to it. You want information (temptation), which you then judge as true vs false (conflict of reason) and which is why you consent to believe those who suggest information (temptation) aka a false authority. And you consent to their suggestions by free will of choice; which represents your sole authority over self, which you ignore by doing so.
Religion (to bind anew) requires consent by free will of choice to believe a suggestion. I clearly state to utilize implication (if/then) over reason (true/false); inspiration (adaptation) over information (stagnation by belief) and need over want.
Ship aka ONE vessel within ALL motion aka form within flow. You cannot worship ONEself without adherence to ALL. Consenting to believe the suggestions of other ONEs within ALL represents the ignorance of ONEs self sustenance within ALL.
"free" will of form is defined through the "dom"inance within flow; hence freedom representing coexistence of both in balance. I adhere to ALL for the sustenance of ONEself; you adhere to another ONE; while ignoring adherence to ALL; which corrupts not just the sustenance of ONEself (you), but all the other ONEs around you aka the consequences of ignorance set into motion; spreading corruption.
Ignorance represents shirking responsibility over self onto others; which is why you caste blame.
Wrong caste dipshit.
Uhh, I'm pretty sure only daughters can embrace their inner dad. How can a son hug someone inside them when they can only be entered from behind?
Maybe they mean uncles with no kids of their own?
But not too father friendly